wolf33d

Does 4K@120fps means it will for sure shoot 2K @240fps ?

Why buy a GH5 when with have full frame A7SII A7RII and soon A6100 with 4K? With better image, better low light, better DoF, better stills picture. Only way I buy a GH5, give me: 10bit 4:2:2 240 fps FHD (even with a 5sec max buffer I am fine) Clean continuous 120fps in FHD 5 axis stab as effective as Olympus <1800$ And if you tell me DoF and Low light from A7SII is not important, then get yourself an RX10/100 with 4K, clean 240fps and stabilization for half a GH4 cost with lens. If they want to compete with Sony monsters, they need to push the specs a lot. Not to mention 4K is coming soon in DSLRs (Canikon)..

Look at the guy comments here: https://vimeo.com/139784830/comments

I mean just look at the first video here; https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/1091165875/steadxp-the-future-of-video-stabilization/posts/1349311 this is done with early prototype on a shit GoPro Hero 2 !!!! This type of dynamic footage have never been seen before, even on amazing GoPro video. This is huge. I am completely amazed by the negative reactions and pessimist people here on this thread. You guys are incredible.

this is my understanding of this interview: http://www.canonrumors.com/interview-with-canons-masaya-maeda/

lol Man , I never said I made some quotes of the article. What's the point anyway in posting a link and just quote from it. i developed my own ideas on the motion market there that's all ;)

Have you been through all the videos on the kickstarter page ? I have rarely seen a project with that much footage on the site actually. He has to send the footage cause the soft is not finalized. You can't compare this with warp stabilizer. It is miiiiiles away in term of stab quality (and way faster too) The mic jack is just for sync at the first 2 seconds of the shot then u can remove it. Also there is a technique to synchronize without using the mic at all (see FAQ on the website)...

http://admiringlight.com/blog/the-sliding-scale-of-camera-capabilities/ That applies 100% to video. Interesting to see how Canon was a killer, democratizing the industry for stills and then for video (5D2) by releasing affordable devices with pro features. Such a shame it is not the case anymore. What changed at Canon? All of this because of their Cine line I hate it, and hate all of you who are buying C100, C300, C500 that make money to Canon and make them cripple the 7Ds/5Ds bodies for us non professional ... Without this Cine line, we would get a 5D4 with 4K with great bitrate and Canon Log - DPAF and so on....... I still think 5D4 will have 4K unlike many of you (don't imagine how a body can come in 2016 without 4K, that would be non imaginable) when even iPhones get 4K. But it will probably a 5D3 like video, which means not clean, poor bitrate, no HFR, ... Anyway.

Indeed, if you use your camera normally, you only need few% crop.

So do you think ML will hack the 5D4 or they are completly dead?

Interesting. I bet on a 4K cam with EF mount, 30fps in 4K RAW on R3D files, for 4K$.

Yes you can. It is just recommended to shoot at 1/125s minimum for best result. Plus it has a motion blur capability in post that works well (see video). Absolutely not. Did you bother at least looking at the link? Actually on a consumer grade shit PC it does render at 8fps for FHD. Considering you are a filmaker with a decent station, you can expect 8fps in 4K. Not bad at all. Indeed. If you want native 8k it is not the solution either. It is the solution if you want amazingly smooth footage in a 30 grams package instead of your horrible 5 kilos gimbal, to transform 4K footage into FHD (which 90% of people do anyway). Relax. The title of this subject is 2nd degree. This is a first view of a prototype as you say not even on the market. Saying gimbals are dead means they soon will be. In the future we won't use gimbal (in 5 years from now) we will have cameras that will have this guys' system integrated and deliver 4K from 8K silky smooth. The tech of this product made from a young french guy is insane in my opinion. Why Olympus Sony Canon DJI and so on did not make this ? I mean, they have the cameras they should do it internally !! AND IMAGINE THIS ON GIMBALS !! there is already those sensor in a Phantom 3... DJI could do that and deliver a pefect image (this product works best for micro vibration and jittery/jellow images). Also with a gopro, I would certainly have a GoPro with this in 4K superview and deliver silky smooth 1080p than having an horrible twice expensive huge GoPro 3 axis gimbal that does not deliver half of this smoothness. Look at the results in hyperlapse too... This is insane. Just look at the other videos on the link. Anyway, with reluctant negative resistant-to-change people like you, we would still be at the age of stone I say congrats to these guys and even if the product is far from perfect and obviously not useable for 100% of the needs, it is great tech. I aplaude and look forward for the exciting future in camera tech.

For 120 euros integrated to a Gopro, this is a steal. Now just imagine this integrated in your camera, and processed in your camera directly so you get the perfect footage out of the camera. Low processing power required (they say they almost can do real time, because it doesnt have to analyse footage like warp stabilization). This coupled with future 8K camera for a clean silky smooth 4K output is the absolute future of film making. Welcome into the future my friends. Interesting review by Newshooter: http://www.newsshooter.com/2015/09/10/steadxp-kickstarter-launched-next-generation-image-stabilisation-unleashed/

Well. Watch this video and tell me if you can believe it... https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/1091165875/steadxp-the-future-of-video-stabilization?ref=discovery The concept is fantastic. The quality is fantastic. Obiously it needs 4K to work well and shoot a bit wide, but man look at the result !!!!! Wow.

Can someone explain me why one would buy this over URSA Mini 4.6K ? 4K Raw with the URSA at 60 fps isn't killing this ? Plus sony colours... in 8 bit.... ? I don't know.

Well the footage shown above is mind blowing for a phone. This is well above an RX100 mark I.

Indeed. It is 14 Bit Raw output for stills.... 14 bit raw for stills is so obvious for a 3000$ camera even internally so thought he was speaking about video... (admin on SAR)..

Is it just me or nobody NOTICED THE A7SII DOES 4K EXTERNAL RAW AT 14 BIT !?

Incredible the Adobe apps for iPad pro...

Announced this week at IBC. Good for NX1 users..

The idea is not to say you can do fine photos with A7RII. Of course it does... The idea is when you get what is supposed to be the top FF camera in the world at 3200$ in a good proportion aimed at Landcape shooters, then you don't want it to have bad hot pixel issue when doing a 30s picture that you will touch in lightroom (of course...). Anyway.. A7R II is great for many things. Lossy raw and hot pixel issue is not acceptable for a landscape shooter at this price point, IMHO.

Incredible photographs ? I do better than him with a 450$ nikon APSC and 200$ lens. https://500px.com/photo/116472669/false-creek-by-loup-fsr https://500px.com/photo/116327471/reflection-pool-by-loup-fsr https://500px.com/photo/116251089/star-over-assiniboine-by-loup-fsr

According to a german review online, it was sharper than his sigma 35mm ART. ...

http://www.sonyalpharumors.com/sr5-new-fs-e-mount-4k-camcorder-to-be-announced-soon/ Cool.

From Fred Miranda. Only +1 EV stop pushed, and the result is atrocious. He says 100% clean with old A7R. Anyone else saying this is not an issue?? Also LENR forces 12 bit raw..