All Activity

I have a rather nice Nikon Zf but you've probably already found one for 6 quid in Japan!

I have never understood why someone would shoot a 30 minute continuous take at 120fps. It's absolutely fucking bonkers. 120fps is for slow mo. If you slowed-down an hour long continuous take from 120fps to the cinema standard of 24p, it would last for 5 hours. Who the fuck is sitting through that?

I'd argue it is the MOST important because without the camera, you don't have a picture. It is the small differences between the latest sensors and codecs that's the unimportant thing. In cinematography, our job isn't to worry about the costumes or set pieces, that's the job of someone else. So lighting and camera are the most important for a DP. What has happened is the gap between the top-end i.e. ARRI and the cheap stuff has closed up. This has been going on ever since the start of the DSLR revolution so it's not a new thing but there's never been a smaller gap that exists now, for example between something like the Alexa 35 and a $1000 used Panasonic S1H. By the way although Magellan has beautiful content and really nice camera-work, the sharpness of it and the deep DOF isn't everybody's cup of tea. It does look a bit too soap opera in parts of that trailer, I think. It looks very different to an IMAX shot film. So there's big differences between formats and lenses still... The same cinema focal length for example on 16mm has always looked vastly different to same on IMAX or large format. Also there are big differences in grading style, camera movement style, and so on. I think most relevant for us is that you don't need to make a massive rig any more to get good results. It's horrible having the weight as a one-man DP. Probably why they used such a small camera on this.

And while it's not nearly as ridiculous as the EOS R5's overheating problems that were almost entirely caused by the Canon 🔨, when you bring out an S1R on any number of shoots for a long time, someone's bound to start going on about how it overheats. I still get that when I bring out my R5 for slider shots/suction cupping to windshields/etc. "Aren't you worried that's gonna overheat? I heard that camera overheats a lot." "They corrected most of that a while ago and I'm pretty sure it'll make it through this 45 second take, regardless."

Now that many of the overheating problems are fixed, I can't wait to see all the videos saying Panasonic has fixed the issues. Oh wait, that might not attract the views.

Yes, long story short. the right tool for the job. I am a wildlife enthusiast and despite being an amateur, I find myself facing "on a small scale" the challenges I see in blue-chip productions, and there I realize how truly fundamental the equipment is in these situations. A true watershed between getting the shot and not getting it. For a project on the marine fauna of the sand, I spent hours filming various types of mollusks burying themselves. I have a rebreather and therefore no time limit underwater. But the camera in an underwater housing does not have a V-mount battery (unless you have a RED with a 30K euro housing) and therefore you have battery limits. A clam took an hour and a half before burying itself, and I had to film the initial moment. It took me 3 hours and two dives before succeeding. Dives in which I filmed and every minute I stopped and started again. A couple of times that damn clam buried itself while I was stopping and restarting the recording. The same thing happened while waiting for a crab to eat a fish. I cursed because my GH5M2 does not have the pre-recording function (the GH6 has it and the GH7 does not). I thus discovered that the pre-recording function is one of the most useful functions for those who do wildlife. A practically mandatory choice if you shoot in RAW and fill memory cards in a few minutes.

One of the best channels on YouTube in this industry. Thorough, no hype and do actually make quality productions out in the field and not simply spout BS from behind a desk, holding a lav mic wearing clothing back to front.

The probability that Sony answers your question is near zero, but if enough people send emails, maybe they release a lame corporate response. Have you seen those TikTok videos the guy ask his fellow mechanics in their shop "which car brand you would never buy?" and all of them say Audi/BMW? Similar thing exists in camera repair community and they would say Sony.

Just got one in San Diego for $300'ish, so always keep looking, you never know what'll pop up.

Hang on, if we have that coffee next week I’m not obliged to buy a camera off you am I? You’re not turning Costa into some sort of camera Herbalife recruitment centre are you?

New blog post: https://www.eoshd.com/news/thousands-of-sony-cameras-are-mysteriously-failing-but-sony-isnt-telling/

I'll return to Lubezki's work. Feeling the same vibes. The stuff he does with Cuarón, and overall in general I guess, really nurture the deep dof. Here's a film he shot in my back yard. I can literally see the location from my office -- which I still get a kick out of being able to 'name-drop' As an indy documentarian, I gotta say, I can't really get completely behind this notion, but I do think I know what you're getting at and why useage-context with a camera is important. I just came off a project where the cinematographer was leaving an insane amount of shots and potential in the field. Why? He was trying to wield a bunch of large production shit on an full-fledged ARRI set up rather than just shooting good extensive coverage with a small simple rig. Yes, sometimes what he got looks great. But, trust me, what he missed (and missed often) had better potential. You can chalk some of it to him not being that spry anymore ... which to me would demand you go light and small to mitigate that, but he is definitely a boy-with-his-toys kind of guy rather than a remarkable creative. Wants to have the best most powerful super car, even if he can't drive it, y'know? Anyway, IQ superior? Yes. Practicality? Debatable. Which, coincidentally, practicality is the DP's argument for the GH7 and a 12mm lens on this Magellan movie. I kind of like the 'too-much-grain' treatment, but, yeah, it's a choice. Damn. I'm rambling. Too much wine tonight.

Sounds great! Will definitely be getting fans for the cameras, at least for the first few long shoots and first few hot/full sun outdoor shoots. Can't be too careful. Might upgrade to the 17-40/1.8 later on, but almost certainly starting out with the 18-50/2.8.

Yup, I'll be using mostly adapted lenses for both cameras. Thinking of picking up the EF 70-200/2.8 L IS II for the R8. Already have the 50/1.8 STM and 55-250 STM, which I can't wait to use on the R7 for reach. Thinking about the 17-55/2.8, too, but will probably just go for the Sigma 18-50/2.8 for the best AF performance. Will also be picking up more weather-sealed Meike EF/RF adapters with the swappable VND/UV filters, as I like the one I got for my R50V. Saves a lot of hassle carrying and swapping front-mounted VNDs. And yes, already have a Sabrent 512GB V60 UHS-II card for my R50V, and I'll be picking up more for these cameras. Regardless of positioning, Canon STILL forces the camera to shut off when the card door is opened. 🤦‍♂️

Well, this will 90% be used for video, and around 40% of that handheld. Might throw in some flash work (weddings, galas, etc.) requiring the shutter here and there, but I've mostly moved away from that. The rest of the photo stuff I shoot is at high ISO in very low light where flash isn't allowed, as I've been doing since nearly the beginning. Usually use my A9s for that, but I'd also toss the R8 in depending on what lenses I end up with for it. I do like the R50V for its price/performance ratio. That, and paired with the RF 10-18, it's umatched for FOV, size, and capture quality. Nice to have a good amount of controls on a small body from Canon, too!

For comparison its his ZR test At 0.1 High S/N ratio, DR is 6 stops. In his R6III test its only 3. Not only he is not curious at all why its so low, but doesn't even notice the drastic fall of it (from 8.26 to 3.04). As a reviewer I would dig into the data. I seriously feel he's not interested about what he's doing anymore. He's like "AF is good". What? How you tested that? Where is the evidence that its good? Canon website says its good, what else you know? And good for who? and why people should pay near $3k to have "good AF" when their current camera already has good AF? I assume R6III AF is "better" than R6II, but I need to see the evidence in practical situations. That's the job of someone who reviews gears for living.

R5 Mark III? Hope/assume that's a typo and it's for the R6 III. 😱

I'd be truly shocked if the main sources on all of the ____rumors sites weren't the marketing teams for the various camera manufacturers. These days, those sites function as a pretty major portion of their pre-release marketing as well as allowing them to do sentiment/market analysis based on how people react to the rumors when posted.

If this PhotoRumors.com table didn't come from Sony, someone went to a lot of trouble to create it. One possibility is that Sony is leaking this info to keep its FX9/FX6 customers from jumping ship to other brands/systems. Otherwise, I don't see how we get such detailed specs for an unknown and unannounced camera. Such a camera could exist exactly as described, so it is theoretically real and not based on Burano frame sizes/resolutions. The 8K 4:2:2 XAVC-HI (Intraframe) codec, which was featured in the Burano, is the standout feature. The lack of internal RAW is disappointing, but not surprising. Pricing: FX6 and A1 II are both selling for $7K USD. FX8, as described, should be at least $2K-3K more. It is competing directly with the C400 ($8,800) and body-only URSA Cine 12K LF ($7,700), so I would imagine that the FX8 will retail for around $9,000 with the current tariffs.

I really do think the camera is the least important aspect these days though. Lighting, set pieces, costumes, locations, etc. are so much more important. Magellan could have been shot on pretty much any camera from the last 10 years and looked just as good, because everything else about it looks good and it's clearly made with skill and talent. 28 Years Later was a huge disappointment for me as a film (28 Days Later is one of my favorite films of all time) but it's still a gorgeous looking film that was shot on iPhones. If it was shot on a ARRI Alexa 35 it wouldn't have changed what I disliked about the film. And watching it, I didn't think to myself "jeez, this would've looked so much better if they'd film it on a better camera." A LOT of gear went into making it look as good as it does, but the camera itself was pretty low on the list, I think.

I saw one part when he was saying that it was a little annoying that they did not get exact time remaining for recording. The same guy said that it was totally unacceptable a cine camera did not give exact time remaining on the card. OK, it is written cine, but it is still a 2200 USD camera, and h265 by its nature is variable bit rate. Simple example on a sitting interview with a static background and the bitrate goes a lot lower, while have dynamic shot with lots of movement or movement in the shots and the bitrate goes up drastically. The just couldn't find any thing to say positive at the camera except about Nikon color and his luts, that he sell!!!

Don't worry, until Nikon is selling cameras, he will be reviewing... I mean criticizing them.

Here in the US the GH5 has actually gone up quite a bit in price! It's about $600 currently on eBay and Facebook marketplace. If you're lucky you can snag it for a little less, but a few years ago it was going for about $500. I always liked the image out of the GH5s more, especially the colors. The GH5 wasn't terribly difficult to get right, just a few tweaks most of the time, but the GH5s right out of camera always looked really nice. We're pretty lucky to be able to still use these 10 year old cameras and still get incredible results.

And a lot of small improvements too

Maybe with the next camera, he will retire, thank God.