6 replies to this topic

[EOSHD]

Thanks Johnnie for another enlightening test.

The image is sharp (sharpened in post) but soft out of the camera. Confusingly though we now have a different problem. Some intentional market segmentation causing this to be a worse camera for filmmakers than it needs to be. Moire everywhere! Terrible aliasing! No headphone jack!

Therefore I cannot recommend it for video and I urge Canon to put a halt to this kind of bullshit immediately. Just make each product as good as it can feasibly be for the money. I mean seriously how much does a headphone jack cost!?

I am going out tonight so no time to do a proper blog post on this but will look at it again later in the week.

[Zach]

It was between this or the GH3 for me and this video is making the decision pretty easy

I do not think the lack of a headphone jack is really such a huge deal since in camera audio on most cameras is pretty pitiful anyway. But the moire looks terrible!

[Johnnie]

Dear friends.

Please take in account that this is a pre production camera and the images coming out of it are described by Canon as "Beta quality".


Thanks!

Johnnie

[Germy1979]

Gawddamn Canon. There's moire in the damn brownies.

DONE.

[Zach]

There's moire in the damn brownies.

Maybe one of the funniest things I have ever read

[nahua]

If this camera is using the 5dmkII sensor, well then I can't believe the moire. Worse than even the t4i. I am seriously ditching Canon. I love my 5dmkIII, but it'll be for photos only from here on out. Thank you Panasonic, can't wait for my GH3!

[Xiong]

See, I wouldnt care if the 5DMK3 was more for film makers and this was for photos, but the 5DMK3 isnt a good improvement for video from the MK2 in my opinion.

Gawddamn Canon. There's moire in the damn brownies.

DONE.

Yeah that quote made me laugh.