Jump to content

Flynn

Members
  • Posts

    450
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Flynn

  1. I'll get to that soon! I think Rich has a bunch of clips using the FlareFactory and the Century 1.33, which is kind of what you're looking for! :)

    Thanks. Will check them out. Also, just consider it an idea for a future vid. If you get to it, great. That footage from the Helios is really inspiring. If you were to combine that with a 1.5x I bet it would give a 2x feeling. Anyway, keep the Chop Shop vids coming! Glad I found your channel.

  2. ANAMORPHIC CHOP SHOP - FLARE FILTER.
    http://www.tferradans.com/blog/?p=8061

    ANAMORPHIC CHOP SHOP - ANAMORFAKING THE HELIOS 44.
    http://www.tferradans.com/blog/?p=8142

    A few DIY for those who don't want to spend a ton of money but still love the look. :)

    The Helios looks fantastic Tito. I wish you'd take some quick video of it with a 1.5x and 2x to see what kind of look you can get with it and a real anamorphic. Anyway, thanks for the vid.

  3. You're not wrong! Although I think these are the best pistol grip gimbal shots I have seen. It's a neatly small device too and I imagine very quick to setup with the officially supported lenses.

    True. It looks like it will be very easy to use. Just wish the camera on the $649 model was more attractive. 

    I think you overlooked the part where the X5R shoots 4k and the BM Micro "only" 1080p.

    Yeah, I wasn't thinking about that.

  4. I also don't quite understand how this works. But I guess it will - still you are looking at 650 usd for the gimbal plus 1600 for the X5 if I get it right?

    Isn't the raw version of the x5 around 3 times more expensive? Wouldn't it be better to just buy a pistol grip gimbal for $500-600 and add the Blackmagic Micro Cinema Camera for $995. Then you have something on a gimbal that can shoot raw for $1,600 instead of $5,500.

  5. Otherwise, a used SLR Magic 10mm or 12mm is a good option if you really want to go wider. 

    It feels like you aren't getting this. He said he wants something that offers better stabilization.

    I think they believe the OP asked what their favorite lens is :)

    I think you're mistaken if you think anyone believes the 42.5 1.7 is their favorite lens. Just trying to offer some helpful suggestions, something you haven't done.

  6. All the above good suggestions: the Panasonic 12-35mm f/2.8 is crisp and lightweight, and the Sigma Art line offers great value. The Panasonic 42.5mm and Mitakon 25mm f/0.95 are not wide options; moreover, the Mitakon is unlikely to give as sharp results as the other recommendations above. But if you really want wide coverage and low light performance, I would also go with either the Sigma 18-35mm f/1.8 or the Tokina 11-16mm f/2.8 + Speed Booster XL 0.64. The newer Tokina 11-20mm is even better, but not sure if it is compatible with the Speed Booster. If you value stabilization above all else, only the Panasonic 12-35mm f/2.8 has OIS. 

    The 42.5 1.7 has stabilization. Also, I think it will allow him to experiment more with shallow depth of field than the 12-35 and that's often important to people starting out with m43. And it'll be better in lowlight. It's faster and much cheaper than the 12-35. But it won't give them the wide angle. I think the 20 1.7, the 42.5 1.7, and using the kit for wide angle would make for a good combination. I'd much rather have 1.7 than 2.8 on m43 and 42.5 1.7 makes for a good portrait lens. Those three lenses would be cheaper than the 12-35, especially if he gets the 20mm used. I'd also consider getting an adapter and going with some cheap vintage lenses.

    The Panasonic 20mm f1.7 is a long time favourite of mine.

    The Sigma 19, 30 and 60mm f2.8 are also good and cheap.

    Didn't you shoot your recent G7 vid with affordable vintage lenses? I think that might be the best way to go if you don't have to have stabilization.

  7. Doesn't the stabilization on the 12-35 kind of suck? When it comes to stabilization it's not much if any better than the kit is it? I'd recommend the 1.7 42.5mm. It'll allow you to get shallow depth of field, let you shoot in lower light, and the stabilization is no worse than what you've got. The only thing is it's a portrait lens and won't let you go wider. Or the new Mitakon 25mm .95 for $399- it's manual focus but you'll be able to shoot in very low light and easily get shallow depth of field. No stabilization though.

  8. John Brawley said Olympus told him that beginning with the EM5ii they intended for it to be the more video focused of their cameras and the EM1 more for serious photographers. If you look at the recent firmware updates, with EM5ii getting the flat profile, that seems to be the case. Maybe it'll change with the EM1ii, especially if it gets a new sensor, but right now, I'd go EM5ii.

  9. I do have a lot of fun shooting with my em5ii, but I'd like it even more with 4k. 

    Its always something. 

    One day soon though we'll have great 5-axis with 15 stops of DR and great low-light capabilities. 

    Not this year, but not far off either. 

    Did you see the story at 43 Rumors about the global shutter sensor Olympus is working on- supposed to have much better dynamic range and low light capabilities as well. 

    Here's the link. They wonder if it will be in the EMii. http://www.43rumors.com/is-this-the-new-e-m1ii-sensor-detailed-info-about-the-new-16mp-stacked-olympus-global-shutter-sensor/

×
×
  • Create New...