GravitateMediaGroup

new facebook group 'MLV RAW on EOS M' dedicated to what the title of the group is, for anybody that is interested. Other ML discussion is welcome as well. I have been testing ML on the M for the past couple weeks, and I'm absolutly blown away. I've almost forgot I own a Pocket 4k.

youtube 96fps to 60fps testing

peaking water proof which brand mic?? canon duel AF built in ND filters (like canon has done the past few years) can we get the 10 inch screen from the ursa also?

was a cost mentioned? sorry if I missed it.

I have a raw shooting mk3 and I will disagree with you on this.

  i've stuck with rokinon because of their affordability and for the most part always have positive reviews, I've not regretted any and I have a mft 8mm fish, 14 t3.1, t35, t85, the 85mm looks REALLY nice IMO.    If you want a good deal on my 14mm I'm looking to sell it to get a sigma or slr magic   also, if what you have tried shooting handheld with a 24mm (on bmcc) isn't going to look very pleasant. as I said on the other message board, I've achieved very usable handheld with post stabilization...but that footage with with a 14mm lens and me walking like a ninja while having a nice firm grip to prevent bobble.

you guys want to team up and make a video (shot only on BMCC) about the trolls or canon fan boys (I respect canon, their fans on the other hand)   if Jeremy's footage ends up in the cutting room looking little rough, we know Hurtin can clean it up  :P

@hurtin   use the AE workflow if you are going to really try and recreate the issue.  

Word is BMD took a look at the DNSs and they are considering the camera defective.

The plot is about to thicken....

I guess that makes sense, because I have noticed with raw just the slightest color change or very very slight pinch of NR has very noticeable results,  so I guess a slight pinch of "high/low correction" will do the same.

@HurtinMinorKey   Lets not close the case yet, because some things are still up in the air.   Others do not have this issue using AE, and your results testing the DNGs in Resolve have been positive, and we know the footage isn't a complete waste (tying to help the guy get a few hours of his life back ; ) .  What is going on in AE that would create this other than "pushing too far" because lets say a person DIDN'T push in post but still see the noise?  Could a export setting or project setting cause this?  Possibly a debayer issue?  Maybe AE is doing something "auto" during export?     Basically, now that we're sure it isn't a hardware issue, it's obviously a workflow/software issue....but what? lol 

https://vimeo.com/70676250  

This edit isn't to focus on flaws, raw ability, image quality/detail, highlights or shadows.  Just a simple Glidecam test along with a few CobraCrane shots.  It's no MoVI but i'll settle for it being that it's about $14k cheaper.    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d395j6x4RJg

the rokinon 35mm is my most used lens

  Technically, wouldn't this be because IPB is pulling less detail than ALL-I.....that's the way I always look at this. so it's one or the other. 

yeah, that C500 footage was very hard to watch.  too much orange and gold. i'm not sure if this was with a grade or not.  and some of the shots having a blown out sky was of no justice to it. just my 2 cents. 

i've used my glidecam hd2000 and gh2 multiple times and it works fine. you just have to get the weight right, even if you have to make some modifications.

checking the magic lantern site may be the best place to start?

I just got a BMCC, do not buy a MKII or MKIII, just wait on the bmcc.  Also get the gh3 if it's in your budget, it's only a matter of time before it's true ability is unlocked.  But I've seen a few videos already that look just as good if not better than any hacked gh2 footage.

solved camera starts out the update process turned off lol UPDATE: never mind, it keeps putting 1.1 on, although, 1.1 is already installed.

any suggestions?

  I would say the new sony technology, which is about the same as the OM-D, is....pretty much the same, unless it is in fact....the same   I would say in the near future it will be "the norm" for most cameras. As for now Olympus better live it up as the pioneers. But the Panasonic TM700 and 900 had a pretty good built in IS.         ProDad Mercalli works pretty nice, the better the shot, the better it works.  If you are shooting an earthquake scene, don't waste your time. If you are shooting just a simple pan shot or can get a decently smooth walking shot it should do just the trick.  IMO it works better than warp stabilizer and faster.  

6d is gonna be in the same area as mkII and mkIII

digital bolex not listed?