Emanuel

What's your current personal camera nowadays?

Not yet Glenn, I have so many cameras over my desk, I can't decide to quit from any of them yet. But, I surely will ;-)

Not bad at all... :-)

A new one from Jurek (stoneinapound here):

Because there's a new distribution model nowadays based in your personal display, no matter the size of it (resolution matters... : D).

Indeed. They did a bigger leap, just not exactly forward in order to keep the regulars there as myself for example. Why not? Netflix is currently the most successful major out there...

@jcs John as former chap from there where we met for 1st time I guess, what's your currently opinion on cinema5d BTW? I'd love to hear it...

Even though, we can be the only ones to know we're going in the right path, at times. It happens too often.

Indeed. We fully stand all of this as y'all know. The most unique lens going with GH5 for sure. There's nothing not even close to this combo out there. This is the perfect cinematic S35 combo.

Well put, Andrew : ) Frank Glencairn is a reputable shooter for so many years... Fellow reduser as for instance. He deserves full support and all the trust. I'll surely be one of his backers. I fully recommend his efforts and initiative. https://vimeo.com/user1323085 @Frank Glencairn (hi Frank!), all sort of tablets based on same OS, as well, correct?

I fully agree anyways. Even about the first test between the bad (subject, as for instance) and good (also a couple of shots can show us there's way beyond under underexposed techniques included) without mention where production values for the second example can really be not embarrassed by the camera used by the shooter anymore: it's all about potentiality. Not exactly the course that has been done but where it can be done. That's precisely the point. When it's not the device anymore to limit your craft : ) Oh yes, good cinematography is midway to that path.

Dedicated to all those who are willing to find eoshd a digital world of online brotherhood as usual and always should be... from the vulgarity of the jungle where we all live. Inspired by Paul (that guy up there) and some other good fellows a century ago who made History without mention back today our (@jcs) John Schultz of course... ;-) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christmas_truce

That's why I've always appreciated steady shots, I guess ;-)

Gotcha. I stand. Andrew should elect more staff. My vote for you.

Yeah dude, I get the point it is useless starting to guess from online appearances instead ; ) That's the whole point IMO (rather than the usual full IMHO version BTW). But, when I read people pretending they're trying to make a point (to the others) when there's something else in the package, I see on that one, at least, you're right. Hence my 'funny post' remark ;-)

: D Funny post. BTW put me out of there... LOL ;-)

Reason why rule #1: never do online the stuff you are unable to perform in the rest of the world because digital is part within. So, ad hominem attacks should have no place on both sides of same coin. Nor confrontational vibe is welcome especially when you wouldn't repeat it if/when face to face. The world is not perfect either. Apology is part of our ecosystem though.

I understand your disappointment but maybe you had misunderstood me or you had lost my previous posting here, I guess mate. To my view, all this is nonsense. Jon is cool. Ed is cool. People only have different personalities, only that. What's new to see here? I agree with you anyway... people need to chill out in fact. Otherwise, perhaps you need to open more mod candidacies, I bet. The forum has grown up since those days you were a dvxuser poster. And as you reasonably posted before, harmony, balance is a good way to stand the thing. :-) Exactly. Well said, Axel. The problem stands when people tend to see their own side as the right one... Or the other side is fully wrong. *sigh* As Anthony wisely posted, "lynch mob is a microcosm of the world"... The whole world indeed ; ) unfortunately.

Right. What about people and the whole town staring their eyes on the eclipse instead...? Something which puzzles me every solar eclipse is the attempt people go to mimic the same reproduced on and on by many others. Not bad at all to see people faces going to and from darkness, actually.

LOL Right @Andrew Reid, give Ed the power and end of story. Well BTW, feel free to elect me so, as well. I am all peace and love, good contributor y'know, go figure, I don't mind to be mod too : ) Not fair for Jon's hard work though :-)

LOL 2K @ 2.39:1 DCI ratio = 2048×858 pixels 4K @ 2.39:1 DCI ratio = 4096×1716 pixels https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digital_Cinema_Initiatives Well, Jim & Jarred's camera company website has more interesting information on topic: http://www.red.com/learn/red-101/video-aspect-ratios "Note: many say 2.39:1, 2.40:1 (“two-four-oh”) or 2.35:1, but nowadays these typically all refer to the same 2.39:1 aspect ratio. 2.35:1 was an earlier SMTPE widescreen standard prior to 1970, and two-four-oh is just an incorrect rounding from 2.39:1 to 2.40:1 instead of to 2.4:1." BTW, here's something other related there: http://www.red.com/learn/red-101/anamorphic-lenses

Hot thread... Chill out guys and gals ; ) Let's keep it up a little bit at least, we are all friends over Andrew's home :-)

Great post, man... : ) My hat :-)