sandro

I meant from the samples you linked?

What do I have to check to see this?

It is it was on YT with millions of views and they removed it.

I hope NR is not built in the HW...

Well 120p is where we should see the best improvements since the bitrate really suffers there. It's not the NR.

Does the bit rate increase apply to 120p?

Just live from chat support. They know nothing about it for the big guys are still keeping this hidden.

I wonder if you ask Samsung support now about this if they still have the courage to deny.

So it seems that bad quality at high ISO is not the bitrate but the NR inside the camera.

Anyone tried if there any improvement on 3200 ISO and beyond with higher bitrate?

Pro is 80Mbit but with that script it seems you can go till 320mbit.

We don't even know if the nx1 benchmarks does random or sequential reads. Or if it's threaded. It's complicated.

yup and even though size will raise a lot it doesn't matter since sd card are so cheap right now

ok thanks... anyway don't be offended but isn't time limit removal the last of our concerns right now? I can't find a reason to use such a powerful cinematic tool to record for such a long time I wonder why internal storage is so slow...what if we try to enable swapping on the sd card? with fastest cards it shouldn't be a problem I guess

hasn't someone tried to solve this corrupted file thing disabling power saving mode in the dev menu? maybe I've dreamed about it

there must be a point when even hevc shows fine details right?

I wonder what happens with ISO higher than 1600 with this bitrate.

That should be pretty easy to do.

I will check this out when on the computer and I will post my samples

I was testing out high iso raw stills in the dark and I noticed that I always get two different blue lines at high ISO at the bottom of the image always in the same position. The same lines I get when recording video from iso 3200 that I've been reporting and that some people don't see. Also my 18-200 is doing weird things since it misses focus for stationary objects too much (back or front focusing) and when used continuously it causes "freezes" in the EVF while I zoom in and out... sometimes it completely stops working and the camera won't shoot at all. So I'm sending both to warranty...my question is we all got that lenses are replaced all together since they don't repair them...what will happen with camera body though? Will it replaced as well even if they're discontinued or they will try to fix it or give me a refurbished one? Anyway does anyone have the problems I described with both the camera and lens?

At least you can use use copyrighted music on there since the major monetizes on videos. I couldn't upload my last videos on vimeo since they got deleted immediately.

we'll see how it compares side by side in low light with the nx1

the 16-50 price raised by a lot..Im using the nx1 for stills with af and I must say I miss the optical viewfinder both for the quality and the af missing a lot of shots

OK but compared to the NX1 is way ahead, I mean 12800 is decent, NX1's 3200 stars being unusable.

Are you sure the a6300 degrades from 6400? The sample from cinema 5d shows much more than that!