Jump to content
wolf33d

Sony RX100 V - official topic

Recommended Posts

EOSHD Pro Color for Sony cameras EOSHD Pro LOG for Sony CamerasEOSHD C-LOG and Film Profiles for All Canon DSLRs

It would be cool, but for me I rather have raw and the perks that come with it as opposed to jpeg compression. Either way, using still sequences for video is a typical feature that I would use once or twice for fun and never again.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
17 hours ago, Vladimir said:

damn, i believed till the end its shooting 24fps of raw and folowed the news( is it true that it shoots 6 secs of FineJpeg not 6 secs of RAW? I thought it gonna be my second and a last cam i need) Seems im gonna stick with bmmcc for that and gonna shooting videoblog without 180 degree flipping screen (actually now its without any of screen, gonna do it really-old-style with only measured distance )

They shot JPEG because no software can process the RAW files from RX100 V yet.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Luke Mason said:

They shot JPEG because no software can process the RAW files from RX100 V yet.

which is not a reason not to try such crucial option i belive) the camera itself still capable of shooting raw continious even if there is no software for decoding at the moment, right?)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Vladimir said:

which is not a reason not to try such crucial option i belive) the camera itself still capable of shooting raw continious even if there is no software for decoding at the moment, right?)

It is capable. But if they shot RAW, you wouldn't be seeing a video at all.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, Luke Mason said:

It is capable. But if they shot RAW, you wouldn't be seeing a video at all.

but if so - i would know duration of that shooting. Which is waay more important for now.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Vladimir said:

but if so - i would know duration of that shooting. Which is waay more important for now.

Buffer handles 150 RAW + JPEG images, so it means 6 seconds @25fps, over 6 seconds @24fps.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

what perks does HD raw (with 1/4 the data of the 4K image) have over 1/3rd compressed 4K from jpegs? the Jpegs have more data. There is more information in them, compression or no compression.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, tugela said:

what perks does HD raw (with 1/4 the data of the 4K image) have over 1/3rd compressed 4K from jpegs? the Jpegs have more data. There is more information in them, compression or no compression.

dunno. color information? 12bit vs 8bit? stuff like that i think

 

18 hours ago, Emanuel said:

Buffer handles 150 RAW + JPEG images, so it means 6 seconds @25fps, over 6 seconds @24fps.

is this information from official source? after some rough calculations i do believe more in imaging-resources which said it has 150 series for jpeg and 71 (3 secs, not exciting anymore) for raw. Im also thinkin about how fast raw cont. shooting will drain a battery)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Vladimir said:

is this information from official source? after some rough calculations i do believe more in imaging-resources which said it has 150 series for jpeg and 71 (3 secs, not exciting anymore) for raw. Im also thinkin about how fast raw cont. shooting will drain a battery)

Not official source, so far. It is spread all over the main reports on the release, though.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 hours ago, Vladimir said:

dunno. color information? 12bit vs 8bit? stuff like that i think

 

is this information from official source? after some rough calculations i do believe more in imaging-resources which said it has 150 series for jpeg and 71 (3 secs, not exciting anymore) for raw. Im also thinkin about how fast raw cont. shooting will drain a battery)

jpegs from the RX100 are 24 bit.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

just a quick question: would you guys consider a RX smartphone, which would be as thick as a RX100, but only feature a prime lens? I love this idea, but the Panasonic CM1 didn't really get a lot of attention

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, JurijTurnsek said:

just a quick question: would you guys consider a RX smartphone, which would be as thick as a RX100, but only feature a prime lens? I love this idea, but the Panasonic CM1 didn't really get a lot of attention

I had the CM1, it was a good phone with an awesome camera. Really nice concept. Only reason I switched was because Im in a 100% film fase with stills.

I did a review as well.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...