Jump to content

ryne275

Members
  • Content Count

    19
  • Joined

  • Last visited

About ryne275

  • Rank
    Member

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. 3840 x 1080 at 480fps is NOT possible. You'll see that on a phone before you will a full-frame mirrorless
  2. ryne275

    iPhone XR, XS

    The original Sony A7 is like $700//800 new. Not sure why you'd buy a phone camera over a full frame mirrorless. For video tho, sure, the iPhone destroys the original A7. But for photos? The A7 is your best bet
  3. How much would the original a7s come down in price if/when this is announced soon?
  4. Man, where the hell is the a7s III? Why is Sony talking so long with this one? 4K 60P is needed
  5. in terms of video , can nx500 compete with a7iii ?
  6. Wow, no 4K/60? Why? My $1K iPhone can do it
  7. wow crazy announcement especially considering price . but , where the hell is sony with a7s3??? they're so behind lol. none of their mirrorless can do 4k60
  8. how does gh5s compare to a6500 in terms of sharpness
  9. so is a7iii now as good as a7s in low light ?
  10. ryne275

    NX2 rumors

    doesn't the nx1/nx500 still provide a sharper image over gh5s?
  11. i don't understand...ya'll want a cine cam...but if that's REALLY what you want there are better options out there...hell, you can find a used red one mx for about the same price...3k 60fps, 4k raw, 120 in 2k... gh5s might have more bells & whistles but the red one is a cine cam and the other is a prosumer cam...plus the red won't give you that icky digital video look
  12. autofocus still not reliable enough in critical, run-n-gun situations...no wonder why casey neistat ditched it
×
×
  • Create New...