User

In the meantime... I'm reminded of how some folks are making the most of a camera. Onward!

This is how one says very little about nothing. Congrats.

It's alright (not great) for what it is... a portrait of some folks living in a big city which had not been done before and I think that's why Netflix took it. No idea how much they paid or how the filmmaker was able to approach Netflix unless it was through an agent or well established producer... word is that one doesnt just call up Netflix. Maybe you could expand on this?

Fuck most people. I know someone who recently sold a doc to Netflix shot on a 5DM2. All these sods constantly tripping over themselves for the 'best' image while regurgitating the same tired shlock. Story and form trumps all. C100 or die!

Let us not confuse praying with mindfulness Grasshopper Now let's get back to the camera gak!

Meditation?

Ok. Go get high then?

Go mix another drink and... calm down. Please?

And not just old... but seasoned

C100MkII No muss, no fuss.

Alrighy then. Here ye. Here ye... Nobody has a gun to your head... vote with your dollar... and carry a big stick.

Really? It didn't take them long to figure out that used panties sold in vending machines could turn a button... and a buck. Say it with me... market segmentation... and quaaludes.

Vice doing what it does best. Anyone know where to procure the Ebola virus?

I added a PPro blur filter to these these 12fps images to see if I could knock back the motion blur of my subject dancing, but makes obviously makes the whole frame soft. Anyone have an interesting method to treat material that has a fair amount of motion blur so that they don't look like they've had an effect applied?

Alrighty. I just did some test and my memory just ain't what it use'ta could... too many carbon monoxide w/ benzene sandwiches. You guys were right on the money in that the only shutter speeds lower that the frame rate will cause the issue. Somehow I forget this. And somehow the camera was shooting at a shutter speed of 12fps at 23.976fps for these double images. Man. Thanks again folks.

2 of every 3 frames are doubled in both the original material and the transcoded ProRes material. Material is from the C100 shot progressive. * My edit: The C100 menu did not have a shutter speed that I could select that was below 1/24. I'm almost positive I chose 1/34 because a couple(?) of the others (1/24, 1/30, 1/40) caused flicker. I was shooting in a PAL region but the camera was set to NTSC. Can anyone explain why my comment is not viable? I think it has something to do (like Ben mentioned) with fitting slower refreshed shutter images (1/34) into a 23.976 frame rate... and since the 1/34 images are refreshing slower than the 1/48 images, every second image is 'doubled' so that it can keep up with the frame rate.

I mounted the original storage hard drive, and Media Info also indicates that the files are 23.976fps. I posted the attachment. The C100 menu did not have a shutter speed that I could select that was below 1/24. I'm almost positive I chose 1/34 because the others (1/24, 1/30, 1/40 were causing flicker. I was shooting in a PAL region but the camera was set to NTSC. I have other files from the same location that are shot at 23.976 1/48 and are just fine.

You bet amigo. The duplicate frame is there in the original AVCHD material played via Quicktime player. I'm scouring the net looking for the reason, I haven't found a succinct answer yet but I think it has something to do (like Ben mentioned) with fitting slower refreshed shutter images (1/34) into a 23.976 frame rate... and since the 1/34 images are refreshing slower than the 1/48 images, every second image is 'doubled' so that it can keep up with the frame rate. Yeah... that has to be it. Looking at these 1/34 shot clips, aside from some occasional motion blur, I wonder if anyone would notice that they were not shot at 1/48? I'm not sure that I would do this again but I really needed the extra light. Hats off folks... love this place.

Hi Adam, just imaging you have the file open in a NLE and you are going through the shot frame by frame. In every 3 frames, 2 are the same. These clips look fine but when a subject moves fast there is some small blur due to the slow shutter speed.

Hi Ben, I checked the original files and they were shot at 23.976 as can be seen in the attachment. I'm thinking @Andrew Reid could answer this in a flash. Andrew?

Actually Ben, come to think for it, I was using the C100 MkII and it doesn't do 48fps. Only 60fps.

Interesting Ben, I'm pretty sure I shooting at 23.976. Is this the only possible option?

I was shooting in a very dark place. I dropped the shutter speed from 1/48 sec to 1/38 (or 1/30 can't remember exactly). Now when I'm playing back the footage frame by frame, for every 3 frames, two are the same. Why?

Yep MTV Asia back in 2001. Hakaru was quite the star. I played the same song to Japanese expat friend and it made her heart ache and she weeped. Gosh. Also had a kitchen with a similar layout as the one featured in the clip so I made a copy featuring yours truly. Ugh But yeah... the English translations often come off as comedy... I also couldn't listen to some music if I understood the native language.

Yes but the Dandy's were finished after 3 albums... sugar coated pop. Anton, on the other hand, is a force of nature that makes global warming look like sissy stuff.