-
Posts
394 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Reputation Activity
-
Matt Kieley got a reaction from Thomas Hill in Why are bad cameras the best cameras?
Speaking of the G7, I used one for a while and shot a bunch of stuff with it. Here's a little c-mount lens/FilmConvert test from 2017:
I still love the look of this.
-
Matt Kieley got a reaction from PannySVHS in Why are bad cameras the best cameras?
Speaking of the G7, I used one for a while and shot a bunch of stuff with it. Here's a little c-mount lens/FilmConvert test from 2017:
I still love the look of this.
-
Matt Kieley got a reaction from kye in Why are bad cameras the best cameras?
Speaking of the G7, I used one for a while and shot a bunch of stuff with it. Here's a little c-mount lens/FilmConvert test from 2017:
I still love the look of this.
-
Matt Kieley got a reaction from webrunner5 in Why are bad cameras the best cameras?
Speaking of the G7, I used one for a while and shot a bunch of stuff with it. Here's a little c-mount lens/FilmConvert test from 2017:
I still love the look of this.
-
-
Matt Kieley got a reaction from PannySVHS in Why are bad cameras the best cameras?
I've been considering getting a GH1 as an experiment, to see what I can do with it now with more experience/better lighting. I'm surprised by the color/fidelity of the GH1. In certain situations, newer cameras are better. I recently shot BTS on a friend's short in very low lighting conditions, with the GH5. As so-so as the GH5 is at 3200iso, the GH1 would be so much worse (color shift/noise above 640iso) and no stabilization. But in a narrative film situation with more control, there might be less of a difference. After writing the above, I decided to make a reel of some old GH1 footage remastered and regraded:
And here's a couple other test videos I would have included had I not deleted the raw footage:
-
Matt Kieley got a reaction from solovetski in Why are bad cameras the best cameras?
I've been considering getting a GH1 as an experiment, to see what I can do with it now with more experience/better lighting. I'm surprised by the color/fidelity of the GH1. In certain situations, newer cameras are better. I recently shot BTS on a friend's short in very low lighting conditions, with the GH5. As so-so as the GH5 is at 3200iso, the GH1 would be so much worse (color shift/noise above 640iso) and no stabilization. But in a narrative film situation with more control, there might be less of a difference. After writing the above, I decided to make a reel of some old GH1 footage remastered and regraded:
And here's a couple other test videos I would have included had I not deleted the raw footage:
-
Matt Kieley got a reaction from IronFilm in Why are bad cameras the best cameras?
There are some limitations with the GH1 dynamic range, but the clips in the reel are mostly available natural light. One or two shots are lit with a shop light and diffusion gel. Imagine if I actually used lights and modifiers as I would now, it would look much better. And I was just using the 14-42mm Panasonic kit lens, a Canon FD 50mm 1.4, a Sakar 28m f/2.8 and Sankor 16c/Optivision XW5000 Anamorphic lenses.
The second video (Lighting test) is when I got more serious and bought lights, a modifier and "cine" lenses: 300w and 150w Arri fresnel knockoffs, a 5-In-1 reflector, and a Rokinon 16mm f/2 and 24mm f1.4
The bottom video is a test a friend (the one in the video) wanted to shoot for a film he wanted to direct (with me as DP) when I lived in North Hollywood in 2014. He wanted to test spherical and anamorphic. This video kind makes me want to get a Helios 44M again.
-
Matt Kieley got a reaction from IronFilm in Why are bad cameras the best cameras?
I've been considering getting a GH1 as an experiment, to see what I can do with it now with more experience/better lighting. I'm surprised by the color/fidelity of the GH1. In certain situations, newer cameras are better. I recently shot BTS on a friend's short in very low lighting conditions, with the GH5. As so-so as the GH5 is at 3200iso, the GH1 would be so much worse (color shift/noise above 640iso) and no stabilization. But in a narrative film situation with more control, there might be less of a difference. After writing the above, I decided to make a reel of some old GH1 footage remastered and regraded:
And here's a couple other test videos I would have included had I not deleted the raw footage:
-
Matt Kieley got a reaction from webrunner5 in Why are bad cameras the best cameras?
Thanks. It was my Optivision XW5000 anamorphic lens. Not sure which taking lens it was, either the Sakar 28mm f/2.8 or Bushnell 35mm f/2.8. I can't remember which taking lens I used for the tighter shot. I sometimes used a 75-150mm f/3.8 zoom (can't remember the brand). I think some of the exterior shots were the Canon FD 50mm f/1.4 (chrome ring).
-
Matt Kieley got a reaction from webrunner5 in Why are bad cameras the best cameras?
I've been considering getting a GH1 as an experiment, to see what I can do with it now with more experience/better lighting. I'm surprised by the color/fidelity of the GH1. In certain situations, newer cameras are better. I recently shot BTS on a friend's short in very low lighting conditions, with the GH5. As so-so as the GH5 is at 3200iso, the GH1 would be so much worse (color shift/noise above 640iso) and no stabilization. But in a narrative film situation with more control, there might be less of a difference. After writing the above, I decided to make a reel of some old GH1 footage remastered and regraded:
And here's a couple other test videos I would have included had I not deleted the raw footage:
-
Matt Kieley got a reaction from kye in Why are bad cameras the best cameras?
I've been considering getting a GH1 as an experiment, to see what I can do with it now with more experience/better lighting. I'm surprised by the color/fidelity of the GH1. In certain situations, newer cameras are better. I recently shot BTS on a friend's short in very low lighting conditions, with the GH5. As so-so as the GH5 is at 3200iso, the GH1 would be so much worse (color shift/noise above 640iso) and no stabilization. But in a narrative film situation with more control, there might be less of a difference. After writing the above, I decided to make a reel of some old GH1 footage remastered and regraded:
And here's a couple other test videos I would have included had I not deleted the raw footage:
-
Matt Kieley got a reaction from projectwoofer in Why are bad cameras the best cameras?
I've been considering getting a GH1 as an experiment, to see what I can do with it now with more experience/better lighting. I'm surprised by the color/fidelity of the GH1. In certain situations, newer cameras are better. I recently shot BTS on a friend's short in very low lighting conditions, with the GH5. As so-so as the GH5 is at 3200iso, the GH1 would be so much worse (color shift/noise above 640iso) and no stabilization. But in a narrative film situation with more control, there might be less of a difference. After writing the above, I decided to make a reel of some old GH1 footage remastered and regraded:
And here's a couple other test videos I would have included had I not deleted the raw footage:
-
Matt Kieley got a reaction from projectwoofer in Why are bad cameras the best cameras?
There are some limitations with the GH1 dynamic range, but the clips in the reel are mostly available natural light. One or two shots are lit with a shop light and diffusion gel. Imagine if I actually used lights and modifiers as I would now, it would look much better. And I was just using the 14-42mm Panasonic kit lens, a Canon FD 50mm 1.4, a Sakar 28m f/2.8 and Sankor 16c/Optivision XW5000 Anamorphic lenses.
The second video (Lighting test) is when I got more serious and bought lights, a modifier and "cine" lenses: 300w and 150w Arri fresnel knockoffs, a 5-In-1 reflector, and a Rokinon 16mm f/2 and 24mm f1.4
The bottom video is a test a friend (the one in the video) wanted to shoot for a film he wanted to direct (with me as DP) when I lived in North Hollywood in 2014. He wanted to test spherical and anamorphic. This video kind makes me want to get a Helios 44M again.
-
Matt Kieley got a reaction from PannySVHS in Does anyone shoot in B&W?
Shot some BTS footage of a friend's short film last weekend. Some of it looks good in B&W.
-
Matt Kieley got a reaction from Emanuel in Does anyone shoot in B&W?
Shot some BTS footage of a friend's short film last weekend. Some of it looks good in B&W.
-
Matt Kieley got a reaction from PannySVHS in Is the EOS-M *THE* Digital Super-8 Camera?
Update: I pried the fucking thing off with a screwdriver. Everything still works properly, but I added a few scuff and scratched to the aperture ring. But now I have to get to work, so I'll have to wait till tomorrow to shoot some actual test footage.
-
Matt Kieley got a reaction from Ricardo Constantino in Is the EOS-M *THE* Digital Super-8 Camera?
Update: I pried the fucking thing off with a screwdriver. Everything still works properly, but I added a few scuff and scratched to the aperture ring. But now I have to get to work, so I'll have to wait till tomorrow to shoot some actual test footage.
-
Matt Kieley got a reaction from kye in Is the EOS-M *THE* Digital Super-8 Camera?
Update: I pried the fucking thing off with a screwdriver. Everything still works properly, but I added a few scuff and scratched to the aperture ring. But now I have to get to work, so I'll have to wait till tomorrow to shoot some actual test footage.
-
Matt Kieley got a reaction from webrunner5 in Is the EOS-M *THE* Digital Super-8 Camera?
Update: I pried the fucking thing off with a screwdriver. Everything still works properly, but I added a few scuff and scratched to the aperture ring. But now I have to get to work, so I'll have to wait till tomorrow to shoot some actual test footage.
-
Matt Kieley got a reaction from kye in Is the EOS-M *THE* Digital Super-8 Camera?
I'm starting to test out raw shooting with this camera again. The mlvapp workflow is definitely faster with my Macbook Air M1 than with my old PC when I first tried out raw 5 years ago. I just got a good deal on an Angenieux 8-64mm f/1.9 (as well as a loupe and pistol grip for Super 8 style shooting) that I'm dying to try out.
-
Matt Kieley got a reaction from webrunner5 in Is the EOS-M *THE* Digital Super-8 Camera?
I'm starting to test out raw shooting with this camera again. The mlvapp workflow is definitely faster with my Macbook Air M1 than with my old PC when I first tried out raw 5 years ago. I just got a good deal on an Angenieux 8-64mm f/1.9 (as well as a loupe and pistol grip for Super 8 style shooting) that I'm dying to try out.
-
Matt Kieley got a reaction from mercer in Is the EOS-M *THE* Digital Super-8 Camera?
I'm starting to test out raw shooting with this camera again. The mlvapp workflow is definitely faster with my Macbook Air M1 than with my old PC when I first tried out raw 5 years ago. I just got a good deal on an Angenieux 8-64mm f/1.9 (as well as a loupe and pistol grip for Super 8 style shooting) that I'm dying to try out.
-
Matt Kieley got a reaction from PannySVHS in CinePi-2K Open Source Camera
Octopus Cinema Camera actually posted yesterday about a side project they're working on using their software with the Raspberry Pi camera.
https://www.instagram.com/p/CaaLmwyKNhO/
-
Matt Kieley got a reaction from billdoubleu in CinePi-2K Open Source Camera
Octopus Cinema Camera actually posted yesterday about a side project they're working on using their software with the Raspberry Pi camera.
https://www.instagram.com/p/CaaLmwyKNhO/