Marcio Kabke Pinheiro

For me it is the Komodo response. Canon never bothered with Blackmagic or Zcam. And with lower priced cameras.

Yep, got the leaked size / weight of the S5, compared to the GH5: GH5 - 138.5x98.1x87.4 mm (camera body only, excluding protrusion) - weight 724 with battery and sd card), 645g body only S5 - 132.6 x 97.1 x 81.9mm (excluding protrusions) - weight 714g (with battery and sd card), 630g body only

Holy shit, I thought that the scales were wrong, played with the file in Gimp but they are right. Made a VERY crude size comparison with the GH5 (got a size comparison between the S1 and GH5 in Camerasize, and used the S1 mount as size reference - sorry for the quality) and...looks like that it is even smaller than the GH5.

It resembles VERY MUCH a GH5. Reinforces my opinion that a GH6 might not exist...

Only me, or the S5 resembles VERY MUCH a GH5, especially on the top plate?

Panasonic interview in Imaging Resource: https://www.imaging-resource.com/news/2020/08/20/panasonic-interview-covid-development-full-frame-micro-four-thirds "Mr. Yamane: Yes, we believe L-mount is a highly optimum mount for video shooting. And so going forward, we'd like to make L-mount a standard of the video shooting industry. Within the alliance, we'd like to discuss how to strengthen our video performance, and make it a kind of a standard for the video shooting world. DE: You hope L-mount could maybe become like the PL-mount, so very popular. Mr. Yamane: Yes. Yeah, this is my personal hope, that L-mount could be the standard format for video shooting." About m43: "For telephoto or super-telephoto, maybe we should go with the Micro Four Thirds, which makes a more compact package with high-zoom. So we are studying the future development plan, including Micro Four Thirds." "Mr. Yamane: We introduced the S-series of full-frame cameras, and we target high picture quality with the S-series. However, there is some video footage which only Micro Four Thirds can realize, in terms of optimum depth of field, mobility, zoom ratio and so on. So Micro Four Thirds is also a precious asset for us to cover video shooting needs. The GH-series has been already used by lots of videographers, and it is used for high-end video shooting by one-man operations. So without fail, by using the GH, customers can make very attractive footage using the characteristics of Micro Four Thirds. We are now studying how we are going to evolve GH series going forward, [to make the most of its advantages]. DE: Hai. (Yes) Mr. Yamane: Thanks to Micro Four Thirds' smaller sensor size, it is good for high-speed response; high frame-rate video" For me, looks like that video would be all in L-Mount, and m43 would be for niche formats. (before calling me m43 hater - I ONLY have m43 cameras)

I guess that people that uses Cxx cameras value such more thing than recording specs. Form factor, abudance of hands-on controls, better thermal management (even without the R5 crippling)...

Unfortunately, maybe it is the case. In the stills foruns that I look, people are giving a damn about the issue and just wanting to know when they could buy it. Only chance is a class action suit - japanese people do not like that kind of thing.

My point is: there will be a GH6? Using GH5 compatible batteries is a good incentive for switching... I always thought that, if Panasonic would release a new MFT camera, would be the GH6. But with no "rumors" flowing, no MFT news since the 10-25 f/1.7...maybe there will not be one.

Or, since a FF camera could use the old GH5 batteries, that the S5 is the GH6.

Hope that Andrew do a very good test with the AF. Still skeptical about the DFD - but if the somehow manage to make it work, it would be amazing. One question about the DFD in L mount: it works with all L-mount lenses, or it is like in m4/3, that it only works with Panasonic lenses and not with Olympus ones?

Just saw the last blog post from @Andrew Reid - NOW I'm curious. 🙂

The plot thickens. Best case: there are more than one temperature probe; the API is reading the CPU temp and the EXIF data is internal temp. Hence, you have an failed documented API. Worst case: a class action lawsuit ready to win.

Towerjazz used a Nikon Z image in one of their reports, leading to believe that the Z6 or the Z7 have a Towerjazz sensor. If this is the case, could be a good alternative. But very interesting report about the security market size. Yeah, that is what could bring a new MFT sensor.

Just to correct (a little) my previous assumptions - I had only saw the pictures of the dissassembly, not the video. Now I saw the video, and there is a metal part between the smaller PCB board and the mainboard, where the thermal pads makes contact. If this metal part had a heatpipe to draw the heat away, the problem could be minimized. IF the problem is really heat...

Yeap, exactly my point. As I said, I have some electronics background, and a 2nd year student would never make that mistake. CPU and memory with a thermal pad to conduct the heat...to another board? And when you have a big heat spreader just behind the main board, but put the chips in the other side? It is on purpose, or they have the dumbest engineers in the world.

The "fun" part is that THIS heat pipe could be implemented in the R5 - I has never saw the picture above, never would thought that a heatpipe this small could work. A similar approach could work in the R5 - a thin metallic shield in contact with the chips with thermal pads, and this heatpipe conducting the heat to the bottom plate (it just have to avoid the connector for the board that sits above the mainboard). Than you make the bottom plate with two "floors" (like the heat spreader on the Sigma FP1), with a gap in the middle to help in ventilation and to prevent the bottom to be very hot to touch. Still in the engineering regard...the drawing of the internal heat spreader of the A7SIII looks VERY similar to the on in the R5. Maybe it is a common way to make cameras?

Yeah, everything in this case is VERY strange. I will go back to the pics of the camera internals (I was an electronic technician ages ago, but our @BTM_Pix could give a much more helpful opinion): or these pics are false, or I missed something, or Canon engineers made mistakes that a newbie electronic student would not do. First: the two thermal pads, besides not covering the CPU, are completely useless. According to the pics, above the mainboard there is another smaller board; hence the thermal pads did not conduct the heat to a spreader, but to ANOTHER BOARD? Second: looks like that a big metal spreader exists BEHIND the main board, with a single pad. Canon is trying to dissipate the heat this way? It would be the most inneficient method to do it. If they wanted that structure (the 9th picture in the article) to serve as a heatsink, the CPU and the memory chips should be mounted in the other side of the mainboard. It is utterly stupid. The hipotesis that the pictures could have something wrong is because of the first pic, that shows the back of the back panel of the camera. The gray part looks like magnesium, and there are some "squares" there that looks like to fit some chips on the board, but it is completely different from the smaller board that goes over the mainboard. The rest seems legit - but completely absurd engineering. To solve this, using that big metal part as a heat spreader, they should kind of flip the board layout, but mantaining the actual connectors in each side. This means a completely new desgined mainboard - and it is not the best solution, that metal structure is closer to the sensor, and the heat could bring noise to the sensor. Don't see to much room for a heatpipe to conduct the heat to the bottom of the camera (the best solution on my view). If this pictures are real, it is one of the must dumb designs ever.

"Não tem como" buy a Red camera in Brazil, with the import taxes and general vendors greed. A Komodo will probably cost more than a full equipped SUV here.

Priest: "If any of you has a reason why these two should not be married, speak now or forever hold your peace." Film maker: "WAIT THIS PEACE OF SHIT IS OVERHEATING!" Bride to groom: "See? I said to you to use a lighter fabric in your clothes"

Or could keep some relation with latest EOS developments and rename to OvenHD.

In this case, not. Looks like that they were targeted by Maze, a ransomware group, that already hacked LG and Xerox. Garmin was targeted by another group these days and reportedely paid some millions to recover their data. It's a professional job.

Thanks for the offer @BTM_Pix, but have all of them here with me, hehehe - just don't have the time / skill to do a proper test (Covid + tons of work + baby in the house). Would be for stills, for instance - just to know the better one to bring in (future) trips.

Test that I would like to see and never found: a comparison between the Panasonic cheap kit zooms. The 12-32 pancake, the 14-42 II (the smaller one, not the first version that came in the GH2 times, which is garbage) and the 12-60 (not the Panaleica). The sites that tested the 3 always used distinct methods / cameras.

SInce I'm considering a Fuji future, I was just asking you about it...but if you enable silent mode, you can't use any dials to change the settings, no? Ok, aperture is usually on the lens, but you can assing ISO to the front or back dial? And how you enagage it, could map a button to press?