IronFilm

I'm going to get to work with a Venice tomorrow! :-D

Fingers crossed for a D5600 update with no crop 4K and focus peaking in 4K!

That is exactly the film I was thinking of! When Mercer wrote this:

It was a "paid" shoot, the rate was waaaay low (was less than half what I'm getting on the feature I'm starting on today!). In fact, I half suspect I was either the highest paid or second highest paid crew member on set every day (with the possible likely exception being the gaffer who was bringing a full transit truck to set each day for lighting). The "1st AD" was also the producer, as he'd struggled to find a 1st AD, so he did both!

I've done sound for a short film which was done with an EVA1 (the first in the country). Personally if I was in the market for a small-mid sized camera (not a stills one) then EVA1 would be my top choice if for whatever reason an FS7 wasn't an option (for instance if it is just a bit too big to fit into the "small-mid" sized category).

But if you don't need AF/AE then you can get Nikon F to mirrorless adapters for around twenty bucks each. Although of course when Nikon makes theirs it will need to have maximum compatibility of features.

Shockingly on the film I just wrapped on yesterday, we didn't have an AD (well, technically we had one..... but practically speaking? nah)

Dodged a bullet! Almost recorded leafblowers: Be bold and just ask:

The feature I'm working on now, has a script (which seems to be in a constant state of flux...). But no story boards. Exactly. Even a hundred grand would still be ultra low budget. If you're talking say sub $10K , then I would just call that as "No budget", as it is merely a rounding error.

By NZ's standards we have a few very minor "names" attached to it.

Anything that costs less than a nice new car is definitely ultra low budget. The DoP believes the production got it from Panavision for free for three weeks. I'm very skeptical, I personally reckon they are paying "something" but it is an extremely good deal such as say a one day rental.

Shoot off season, have full insurance, tell them only experienced professionals will touch it.

Like the Sony PMW-F3 ;-)

Heh, I just today got asked "WHAT ARE YOU DOING??" when I pulled out my iPhone to snap a few pics in a pet shop to send the pics of kitties to my gf on my FB messenger. But once I explained it to her though, she was all cool with it. Anyway, my point is you can get given sh*t for using ANY camera! Just ignore the haters.

Sure, as a percentage of videos on YouTube it wouldn't be anything at all. But as a gross number? It would be huge! Every single day of the year without fail there would be content destined eventually for YouTube that is being shot with an ARRI. Because if you spin some deals it can indeed be dirt cheap to shoot on an ARRI if you really wish to. I'm on the third week of an ultra low budget feature film which is being shot on an AMIRA. You can see it in the background of quite a few of my recent uploads, such as today's: This scene was shot so super simple, yes the 1st A.C. had a wireless follow focus and Teradeck for his monitor, but lighting was just a scrim and bounce held each by someone from the lighting team. (Plus careful judgement and timing with the clouds, to keep the look consistent for across the scene) I'm not even surprised. I've worked on Instagram shoots too.

If you don't already use belts, you should, they're life changing. Here I am demonstrating a thigh mount:

The DoP just mentioned that their V mount batteries last around twenty minutes on our AMIRA :-o And yet people complain about the battery life of the original BMPCC.... (although yeah, you can buy V mount batteries which last much longer on the AMIRA)

I damn love that fold out monitor on the AMIRA! Has been so useful for me in recent week's a small the camera operator has been quite generous in positioning it for me keep an eye on it for framing while booming. Am not a fan of dovetails on an ultra small crew, unless you have too, Sony VCT for me! AMIRA certainly has the friendliest audio of all the ARRI cameras.

Arguably the AMIRA is better suited to narrative than anything else you might shoot with it. Especially for small crews (& by that I mean anything that just has at most a 2nd AC, I'd still count that as a pretty small crew). As for an ARRI being overkill for YouTube? Nah, tonnes and tonnes of content for the web gets shot on an ARRI.

Nah, you can always find people who will work for free on short films and such. Doesnt mean they'd be any good... or reliable. Agreed, rather shoot any day of the week with an EVA1 than a stills camera. But an AMIRA is in a totally different size category to an EVA1

Unfortunately yes, this is often how patents get used. Often another company unintentionally infringes, then another company comes along and shuts them down. For instance I bet that is what happened with Tascam when they brought out their DR10 I have only came across it once, and that was a few weeks ago. On a professional shoot, as a last resort back up option just in case their rented C300mk2 failed on them (apparently their XC15 is their in house camera the agency uses when they can't afford to rent in a camera such as the C300mk2)

Hiding away my boom just below the ceiling for the wiiiiiiide shot.

I'm not even using a camera, using a microphone, and I'd like this too please! Exactly! ARRI ALEXA is designed with a crew in mind, while the AMIRA is configured differently in a number of smaller and bigger ways so that going solo (or with a very small crew) is at least an *option*.

If you're doing newsshooter doco style shooting (I.e. Zero or minimal lights, and mostly just locked off tripod shots) then sure AMIRA / F55 / etc are just perfectly fine to use solo, and many many people do so.