Emanuel

I don't understand what you're saying... Really. Sounds I have access to all videos over here... I have access to the videos of people I am following. No idea if all of them but some good part of them for sure : ) Looks like not every countries have that ban if any then. Why that? Weird to say the least.

Why to restrict it along certain regions of the globe?! Sounds too much weird to understand it...

It works at my end... PT-based as of now ATM.

As follows from my posts what seems one thing based on pure legal hermeneutics at the first sight, it can happen to be something else in the end of the road as second and deeper approach exactly based on same hermeneutic principles. Both stand. Requires to see the equation as a whole.

I guess the problem here is beyond that use but the fact it's a machine not a human author behind. https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/LSB/LSB10922 Then the situation changes because there's a model from where the plagiarism (the representation of another person's language, thoughts, ideas, or expressions as one's own original work) may happen and not exactly for artistic grounds but other than pure business, which means someone else getting money from someone else's work. It's all about the concept, not the sample itself. So in short, it's not clear-cut, no simple answer. It depends on variables no less. There's a whole complexity to be evaluated, not a night and day premise.

Despite the fact both elements the character/landscape present there as reference may also be seen as tribute, on the edge. Hope this helps, - EAG :- )

They are just looking public eye IMO. Even though, the character/landscape may serve their lawyers to as we in Portuguese are used to say: "throw the clay to the wall" in order to see if it sticks ;- )

Of course, not. Not for this reason. Ideas are not copyrighted unless when expressed but in intellectual property subject to be considered as such which requires a material/physical medium, not a style, c'mon... This claim is mere nonsense.

In fact : ) Don't kid us : P who needs in terms of IQ anything else later on? ; ) A decade ago BTW, we did straight to the big screen (not YT, not streaming...) an entire feature film with, i.e. shot on glorious 8-bit:

I don't see anything wrong on this release TBH... Only lacks 4K 120fps. But, you have no time limit if you need. Promising dynamic range on FF small and lightweight form factor. 5.9K recording from HDMI + anamorphic 3536x2656/50p there, affordable price... Well, I even think I will be tempted myself to buy it, one of these days ; ) After all, it will match the inventory of fine glass for my 6K FF Blackmagic camera too!

One thing is the film production and the other ones, distribution and exhibition sectors... they are much separate waters. - EAG

Both? ; )

The point is always the need and question of operating with the POV with or without shallow DOF. The issues with that equals to those who are addicted to that look the same ;- )

PPS: Such position to end the scene as mere resource is typical of modern cinema instead; just to clarify it now, also as alternative to the classic use and not to advocate the narrative/dramatic strategy of its adoption.

PS: BTW typical of modern cinema (BUT only) when present... ; ) With minimal use, as matter of fact and both Bogdanovich and Fuller are expression of such concern indeed :- )

Yes, despite the fact no establishing shots about trains crossing the landscape from that allergy to give the POV to the cow... And he was not contemporary of MTV with the frigo replacing the livestock! LOL However, that position of the establishing shot to end the scene is typical of modern cinema and it is the way we at film school were used to end our exercises as part of our learning how to deal with the narrative potential and the need of its dramaturgical empowerment :- )

Now on notebook form factor side too! https://videocardz.com/newz/this-custom-laptop-has-450w-desktop-geforce-rtx-4090-gpu-weights-nearly-7kg

Sorry for suggesting this type of solutions, sound a bit nonsense when people spend well more than a grand of tiptop equipment, no matter the inherent mobile side this time, I guess. It's like those RGB versions of this type of gear, making us, computer stuff users look like all retarded... LOL It's purely insane and lack of any notion of good taste (I wonder how their homes are decorated BTW, sorry for sounding too harsh but I simply have no patience for lack of everything when I take a look on these gadgets' design, poor and fully uneducated to say the least : )

@eatstoomuchjam Nice to know more about you and your insights, much appreciated indeed : ) and thanks for your findings :- ) Still wondering about it, though then: https://www.amazon.in/Cooling-Adjustable-Universal-Streaming-Outdoor No idea why that silly light anyway : D

An angle not strictly (or/and exactly) part of the visible realm provided by the objet d'art but suggested from.

The point with shallow DOF is only both: a) three-dimensional approach as alternative of a pure reality construction; b) the game with the elements inside the frame coupled to the interconnection operated by the viewer, with that requiring the necessary angle to be built up from observer/participant's mind -- pure vibe based on the qualification of reception aesthetics; OK, thrice... People struggle to care about the Hitchcock's standpoint: What for cows' perspective is, after all? When Truffaut asked him why his movies with trains as location have no establishing shots outside the train. - EAG PS: Hope this helps for a better and educated scope on the subject matter ;- )

As much as Welles : ) Obviously deep DOF is much more challenging as much as 2:39:1 ratio once there are more elements to handle during the framing... Despite the saying of Fritz Lang that the format only serves to film snakes and funerals : D

Simply hilarious... So actual... : ) This usual (un)suspect is actually more often brilliant than not ;- )

https://www.instagram.com/whoismatt/reel/DAbRqzIOfiC/

8-bit 3:1:1 HDCAM 1080p BTW... ;- )