Emanuel

Yet seeing the tool as demanding on the way you have to approach to deal with it. It is like a marriage. We can't handle a 2nd wife like we did in our 1st round or we risk to still fail no matter our goodwill to work around the task. Workarounds have their own specs from their own. We don't invent them, we need to adapt them. Filmmaking is invariably a workaround, the tool is primary and secondary at the same time; never the shooter though (E :-)

You did it all :-)

We should all ask so. Not all girls can be pretty. We wish. But happens. Somehow different of a lack of character for sure...

Thanks for posting though : ) BTW, have you checked your shutter?

There are IBIS and IBIS... But something which puzzles me is the fact when we focus on the cons rather than the pros. We all know there's no perfect world out there, only on forums' wishful thinking lists :X No one is also praising to see our neighbors to always pop up pointing the flaws of our children and be quiet about theirs, isn't it? A bit of equity at least should be mandatory before any forum comment. BTW, no personal agendas of any kind and attacking the deepest bias of our own too...

IBIS is not a miracle but a tool for shaky hands. We know some of users would like to have a toaster all included, seems unlikely to happen though ;-)

Mate, go figure if it was the GH5S... hehe Never mind, convinced now. No publicity is bad. First video to watch back to work Tuesday morning :-D

@mercer LOL Better to keep that screening on hold... Hell of a curse! :-D

Good night man or more likely to address you happy morning there instead, I believe ; ) And please be back to the old good chap we met and I still think we all want to hear that from you : ) I miss that, at least. This forum is not the same without both of you two in good vibes (I guess no need to explicitly mention the name of the other forum rebel as well, right? :-)

@mercer Don't state that too loud to Fuji though! :D

Glenn, ISO will distort the results when directly affects DR per se. Tired or not, he's right on that one : ) hey, I am tired too... it is 3:00 AM over here, Sunday night or Monday morning :)) Same ISO on both devices should be a different story, of course :-)

Yes, got you now : ) This is what happens when we (myself) lose scope. To be out of context leads to this lack of perspective from my side as your reader this time. You wrote you were tired, I misread that : )) Thanks for correcting my entry anyways :-) Both, though natures of a different kind obviously, they are not so unrelated as apparently people tend to think in one way or another...

Did not follow the YT video... Only the comments of you all now : ) Obviously DR is not the same raising the ISO bar. What to say then? Discredit, to say the least, right? The other side is the reader's side. Pretty valuable BTW ; ) And if you edit your post without giving notice to the other side, well, that's unfair game :D my dear fellow ;-)

Ah... on that one, yes indeed. Bit rate can perform a play part, obviously. That one is pretty inaccurate from the reviewer side. For some reason GH5S dual ISO is paramount. Just read the whole thread now :-)

Both methods apply :-)

So, "more than secondary, subjective scope is even less than that"... I dare to understand from there. Really? Jon, take a look on your previous input we already know on topic (I guess you didn't change your mind...) versus Andrew's now as for instance following this post of yours. Subjectivity means there's no superior judgment anywhere. Better than saying the other side is wrong, I guess. Far away to be silly instead. As much as no people should address personal attacks in these boards as well. People should have their chance to express their own opinions, isn't it? Actually, it is what that subjectivity is all about, let consensus flow for once here at least ; ) Let alone this holiday season, go figure. Makes me truly unhappy and should make somehow part of a rest of goodwill left inside any of us. The same when you are the target. Happy Easter to all! Oh yes, that XH-1 (I think my sins are forgiven now because I let the X-T2 in the shop shelves :D) along the GH5S make my days beyond the season (E :-)

http://www.fujifilm.com/support/digital_cameras/software/firmware/x/xh1/index.html

Seems ergonomics is actually as much as subjective me and others had referred about after all... ; ) The same for SOOC outcome too where Eterna does shine indeed; not even need to apply for Fuji's color science paradigm, I'd dare to add now for the nth time... not always too much though for a few incomprehensible voices of hate here :X No matter how long the usual suspects have claimed against, isn't it? ;-)

Thanks for posting :-)

Sigma 18-35mm f/1.8 (or the plain FF 24-35mm f/2.0 in a much tight range as 2nd thought if you want to get rid of vignetting in all extension, even though this won't be much of a problem along video crop format especially if you'll avoid the wide end going with the XL version; no issues whatsoever with the Ultra version) will give you the focal length you're looking for. It is the best bang for the buck you'll even find nowadays, no other glass offers you the same. Hope this helps, E :-)

I'm afraid they would even charge much more if they would call it Mini-Eva... LOL So, GH5S is not actually a bad denomination choice to state it quite frankly and pretty straightforward. I am personally done with smartass manoeuvres from business players trying their best to go and get deeper from my indie pocket. Nuff said, Panasonic is usually a decent brand. Even though, that premium fee is not the best signal under such policy. IMHO that's a business mistake. So, in this perspective because 2500 bucks for this outstanding machine it is still a bargain anyways, I am really not surprised with the clientele reaction on GH5S sales. With IBIS, focus hack results (AF mantra has been a sales distaster IMNSHO) or changing contrast AF with DFD technology for a most accurate autofocus proposal indeed and the same price of GH5, this camera would be a terrifying hit, count on it : ) In any case, it is the best cinema camera out there for the price, no doubts on it. If you can only buy one, buy this toy and you won't have buyer remorse at all but a purchase which will heedfully convert in your utmost investment to date. Dare yourself and you'll see the real meaning of this statement, not only virtual words somehow addressed in any tech forum ;-) Don's fully right... This cinematic device is the best tool available nowadays to shoot a feature with. At this price range and hybrid (I'd rather call GH5S 'handy' : D instead) class ride. E :-)

The most curious note IMHO is the fact we feel much difference between both realms than going with the GH5, actually. Eterna is a charm though.

Guys, please stop :X Let the thread go back to the right track, OK? (to be sincere, playground is more than enough, as well the leftover going along with extra downvotes polluting other threads too... thanks for your understanding : )

Filippo's piece of art is enough to testify how this camera is going further and actually truly far away to be a crash cam or anything similar. Let's give outsiders a proper break, put the feet on earth because sky rocket that outcome already is :-)

@webrunner5 It is a miracle, you've perfectly nailed it with your American English, but don't blame the Fuji device, buddy! People kill people, not the tools ; ) I don't think people see Fuji's as their savior in any way other than as matching their tiny agendas by their inner own. On the other hand, Fuji has no high-end to protect other than their medium p-h-o-t-o-g-r-a-p-h-y format. A feature takes ages to comply. We live in hurry times. People have no time to read, why should they have time to go beyond easy LUTs? :-D Ditto & Amen : ) Don't forget Panasonic brand is known by their innovation and prosumer approach, extending their high-end abilities to their minor offer if we can call it so :X