Emanuel

Apples to oranges. What 1080p? P4K? ; ) In a 2019 compact camera for almost one grand doesn't make sense to not include it. Without mention, it is specs-wise, not quality-wise, such mention. Last November, I bought a GX80 practically brand new without visible signs of wear for 150 euros. From then on, 4x Canon M units for less than that. It doesn't make sense to go 4x-6x the price for 4x resolution less for video. We are not half-dozen years ago. 4K is the standard for any home display to buy nowadays. You even struggle to find anything only 1080p if any... : -D

1080p makes that a combo underfeatured and overpriced : ) Precedes their reliability fame, though : -)

haha I see you're done, your coming clientele won't leave your ankles : -)

Bump ; -)

For one simple reason based on several premises: - poor DR; - too light codec bit rate to offer limited color depth; - no chroma subsampling will save the grace. Other than that, skilled hands will be able to make it an interesting tool though. Resolution will make a hybrid made in heaven. Surprising low light performance to close the deal beyond any initial prejudice. E : -)

C'mon, day for night or nuit américaine as known in French through Truffaut's movie is far to be 'the solution' there. Not so easy ; ) not so sensorless technique, let's also give the right credits as due ; -)

I found it perfectly well designed. Very filmic, B movie, the 80s score to match the whole feeling. Those true events inspired by the movie happened in 1981, so I guess everything had a reason to happen. On the contrary of the killers' characters motivation, the essence of the horror success there BTW. My earliest wondering was why the RED ONE MX there? Intriguing until you get the whole thing : ) And yes, there's place for good old digital technology in clever hands : -)

David, I firmly wrote low light photography. For some reason I called it "superb"! ; ) Absence of tools could never be described like that : D Thus, not necessarily low light sensor technology nor even lack of lighting as you wish. This means the set of skills to gather technology available to somehow include: - lights of course, - sensor qualities / range, i.e., its properties and potentiality; to match the necessary technique (let's not forget post either) to provide a certain goal required by the narrative in such case where a low light design is mandatory. You actually had no need for anything else. That is, nothing about no lights approach here. 10-years old sensor technology was enough for the result intended. That's what counts in the end. Without talent and know-how, pal, nothing happens for sure : ) I guess people on these boards tend to overestimate their geek soul rather than art and craft(s) techniques... and see anything fiercely committed with innovation. My point. E : -)

Indeed.

Odd the fact these guys have completely been ignored by a new vague of shooters... TAKE A LOOK

Does 2018 couple to a RED ONE camera make any sense in a movie practically shot on superb low light photography? Shot on RED ONE Camera (Mysterium-X if my eye serves to its signature) with Kowa Anamorphic Lenses.

I guess the removal thing will truly mark this edition from April 8 on.

I am glad they'd rather have to take the word Fusion in a more literal way ; -)

Well, perfectly natural your point but to strictly call it crash cam range is absolutely lame. Without mention how someone who loves art tends to see the most part of the pictures produced there, actually : ) That's invariably their outcome to frequently discard instead. Much more often. History tells that. Not enough number of adverbs to express my revolt on the way gear is categorized according to the(ir) price list. BMD as for instance has proved such nonsense. It is only a matter of numbers. Bucks. Not bit rate nor pixels. The box office numbers or its potentiality, not even the effective cost price of manufacturing. Let alone R&D. A capitalist thing. Nothing against. But call it the name it has. No other. Crash cam is a shame. Just my two cents, though (E : -)

We can't subscribe all of us the yellow, isn't it? There's land of fact and room for opinion on the other hand. Nothing wrong on it : -)

Your in your own. I just disagree : -)

Here's an interesting compilation related to Davinci Resolve 16 from and on reduser! : D http://www.reduser.net/forum/showthread.php?175540-Davinci-Resolve-16-Beta&p=1850280#post1850280 Scroll up the page because I couldn't resist to point to that exact post there... LOL : -)

Speaking of devil, where's RED this NAB'19? From reduser, I can't find the fuss of other editions... Too silent the ambient there, to say the least. http://www.reduser.net/forum/showthread.php?175526-quot-Unofficial-Official-quot-Red-at-NAB19-Events

Indeed. Let's be fair. Apples to oranges. Price-wise included.

This brand is what RED promised to be (E : -)

A couple of days to follow Adobe's announcement. Exciting times we live today! : -)

Rhetorical question there. Just a slight form of sarcasm : -)

Bluetooth so blue case, electric blue or not, makes all sense it is blue : -D

Women with internal brains are a fuck. Trouble to put them out. LOL : -)