Emanuel

Show me that, no sincere idea where you've found it...

Osmo Pocket seems a way more interesting concept... This copycat seems to me much of an empty release. Leave GoPro alone! That's what I feel like to add. BTW, I liked fairly more the GoPro outcome from those comparative videos... In my country, we're used to say there are people who cannot see a poor with a cleaned shirt. OK, we all know Nick Woodman is not exactly a poor man but I guess you get the meaning... ; ) As photographer and self made entrepreneur he has all my respect and I am not GoPro user nor his client either!

4K is a bitch. Certain stuff without necessary care mentioned by Dennis @deezid for example here if/when shot on 4K becomes truly better from 1080p outcome. 35mm film projection is lower resolution, as for instance. Take a look on this thread: http://www.reduser.net/forum/showthread.php?59036-Resolution-of-35mm-film-and-70mm-IMAX-film&s=1226f26dbbd98e6978e23f1094de482d&p=768383&viewfull=1#post768383 That Sir David Mullen's figure by RED tests -- he said something such as IIRC but I recall it as 3.2K as matter of fact. BTW never achieved @ screening room, let's make it clear and such a point. There's still three different links there to address interesting papers to read on topic: http://www.motionfx.gr/files/35mm_resolution_english.pdf http://www.tmax100.com/photo/pdf/film.pdf https://www.healio.com/ophthalmology/optics/news/print/ocular-surgery-news/{8c0eb2a6-586c-4670-a8c4-ad1ad012aad1}/expert-considers-limits-of-visual-acuity-visibility-and-optical-performance-of-human-eye Without mention these both two entries: http://www.reduser.net/forum/showthread.php?59036-Resolution-of-35mm-film-and-70mm-IMAX-film&p=1839943&viewfull=1#post183994 Finally, once again: http://www.reduser.net/forum/showthread.php?59036-Resolution-of-35mm-film-and-70mm-IMAX-film&p=1840009&viewfull=1#post1840009

Frankly, too much nitpicking pixel peeping... Join the black bars and enjoy the part in-between and realistically closer to the senses no matter the customary blah blah ...before the classic has come from local store camera exchange. Looks like when sinners die to born Saints 1 minute later if so.

This whole forum without you @kaylee would be empty like hell! : -) No AF glass for such system yet, I'll receive my first one and report it, OK?

Sure, it is correct and perfectly acceptable, defend your own above anything, crucial part of this business indeed : -)

Where exactly that was shot?

World is a racist place anyway, this is not nice to happen though : ) Interesting reading that article BTW, thanks for pointing that here! : -)

Can you specify please? I love US East Coast... so genuinely cinematic, very symbolic imagética (sorry for the Portuguese word here from semiotics). Great shot as usual BTW, Glenn, but this is nothing new, isn't it? ; -)

Once he is not your son, Don, I believe he feels safe now! LOL : -)

Man, nitpicky is your middle name... LOL ; -)

Nice you struggle more your viewpoints on findings and needs of your own than prejudice ; ) BTW once you mention raw, CinemaDNG will always beat .braw, no matter where you are.

Wrong. That 2019 mention is not 1978, 1979... As such abusive and misleading inference might only end to distort then ; -)

C'mon, let's face it: misunderstandings happen! LOL ; -)

A - Before Deng Xiaoping. B - Chinese dream perhaps to follow Deng Xiaoping. LOL ; ) Neither any of those match rivalry misconceptions nor actual history. : -) EDIT -- @Kisaha and @Shirozina just beat me, they were not so deep though : -P

From his customary avatar signature, I'd tend to assume he has no interest nor need of 4K, I presume, if we can call 4K just like that, a need... ; ) Other than that would actually be a surprise instead : -) We need competent acquisition, resolution can end as mere show off, no doubts on it but its understatement no less.

@androidlad C'mon, let's spill the beans! Where did you find it? Source? : ) Here are more two colorful samples to prove both the high bitrate acquisition capability + raw properties and nicely highlights roll-off put and nothing harsh as videoish tradition and many others out there gave us for so long since electronic capture popped up -- what times we live today... Now add anamorphic glass... ...and you'll be able to reach this with hands for ; -)

Indeed. Exactly same experience here. Reliable suppliers : -)

Simple occasion! Private deal from a sister of a Portuguese private seller when he sold me a few MFT lenses moving to new Canon's FF mirrorless system. New introductions always mean bargains in the existent gear. The woman wanted a new Canon unit as well. I took the chance, she asked 200 euros and I offered 300 euros for a bundle to comprehend that one and a Panasonic's 1" FZ1000 she had in hands as well. Reason also why bashing new releases of a different manufacturer is pure meaningless, plain stupid and fully nonsense : -) @BTM_Pix That's a great find! I almost feel compelled to not resist to keep going my collection of outdated *cough cough* g̶a̶d̶g̶e̶t̶s̶ capture devices... LOL Really : -)

https://www.lg.com/us/laptops/lg-17Z990-RAAS8U1-ultra-slim-laptop?tag=gv18rm0119

BTW Take a look on that smooth a7RII AF... (2nd video) ; -)

And here are other interesting (2019) ones and a comparison table in the 1st two links: https://www.amazon.com/HooToo-Wireless-10400mAh-External-Performance/dp/B074LHG47K/ https://www.amazon.com/IOGEAR-GWFRSDU2-MediaShair-Wireless-Station/dp/B00XEW4L56/ https://www.ravpower.com/p/ravpower-filehub-ac750-wireless-travel-router.html Beyond this much portable solution: ...there's still such most powerful solution already known: https://www.amazon.com/Linksys-Wireless-Dual-Band-Anywhere-EA6900/dp/B00EXK14S0/ https://www.amazon.com/dp/B00ON7AX3U/

Any other takers? Suggestions? Here's one of the gadgets available out there: Audio is absent a good part of the video so my apologies for the content posted but you can get an idea from the subtitles anyway. LOL : ) Here's another one (in French): Both of them above are limited to 300Mbps Wifi so USB 3.0 speed access is pretty irrelevant and out of range over there. This one even less for a half of speed: Here's an interesting tip here: Which might lead us to overcome USB 2.0 limits through faster Wifi going along Dual Band 2.4GHz 5GHz: Or then following that secondary route: