sandro

Hi can you show samples at very high ISO?

So the rumor is that the sony a7s3 will have more MP then the non-S version? it doesn't make sense...

Thanks, just curious how much is the renting per day?

do we know already if the ztf adapter will work even for third party lenses like Tamrons for vr, aperture and focus?

seems like the details is there, that's the thing

for video from your experiences what is the maximum ISO you would use? I remember the xt2 had nice grain up to 12800.

I saw a comparison between a73 and z6 and noticed the sony wins hands down in low light performance. I wonder what sony does differently considering they're both full frame and have the same MP.

is there a good low light comparison with other cameras?

Is it a windows machine? if you have a i7 7xxx series you have hardware acceleration for playback, for 10 bit only with the 8xxx series.

If it has the same grainy look I'm ok with that... will have to wait for more comparisons!

I will, do you own the x-t2? What do you think it's the maximum ISO you can go and still get an usable image?

Do we have any comparison for high ISO in video mode? Maybe to other cameras and the XT2 (to see how much of a "downgrade" that is looking at pictures)?

Isn't 4k60p cropped also? I was just saying that I was expecting in 2018 to drop these freaking crop factors for >1.5k cameras that clearly shows they just can't handle the data. So did you check the ISO?

Funny fact: no one (for the price) still can't match the NX1 processing power. IBIS not there is bummer but God still cropping the sensor even for 1080p 120fps??? Did you see for pics the ISO performance is much worse than the x-t2?

fake "rumor" i guess

Yeah but the algorithm is different.

One word: LOL.

I wonder if those features (still) missing and crippling are because they're really not able to do it technically or is it the trend CanonSony started? = "since others won't innovate that much let's just do little to no upgrades as well so we can get all the money that we can with zero costs". Did we get ourselves a new Canon/a6xxx?

The NX1 was amazing until the Samsung marketing department came in and decided to make the image look like their TVs = oversharpening, supercolors and "wow effect" as if this product was the for mass to be sold in stores by people who knew nothing about cameras.

You really seem to forget the horrible ISO performance, really horrible, looking like a handycam above 1600. Lenses for low light? Sure get the premium S lenses, used, and you can just trash them after you decide to switch system. Need more low light? Sure buy the adapter for the price of a low end panasonic mirrorless, again that you will trash since it can't be used in the future. It was an amazing product no doubt, anyway let's not forget about its flaws for low light when others were way better already. And fixing those issue by giving away for money for a DEAD system is not something I would advise or feel good about it, honestly. However if the NX2 was real........

Great, lenses used?

Sorry, what else then?

So why don't they?

I wonder how many years it would take other companies to remove those technical limits, Sony can't avoid overheating, Fuju can't avoid cropping...

Actually we're saying the same thing, that's why I used Google as an example. Basically they could just do it just because they can and they could destroy every company out there just for fun (on performance and tech, of course). BUT if they did that in the past and left even while closing down factories... well my friend, they are actually interested in profit.