Jump to content

matthere

Members
  • Posts

    166
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by matthere

  1. 14 minutes ago, Jn- said:

    One other thing too is that the native MFT lenses are designed for fairly substantial software corrections in camera, especially at the widest end, this is an extra post job not required with say a GH5.  CA’s and vignetting are also corrected natively, but not with this camera.

    I understand the discussion around software corrections in the Panny and Oly cameras, I wonder if Resolve could add corrective algorithms seeing as Blackmagic's cameras use m43 lenses?

    I've not noticed any "substantial" problems myself but I tend to use manual wide lenses from SLRmagic and Laowa currently, the PanaLeica 10-25 f1.7 has my attention though ? 

  2.  The GH5 is a capable camera and certainly the camera to pick up for stuff on the go, but I think the P4K will have the edge in low light and with a steadycam or gimble giving it the potential for some movement in narrative work... I have one on preorder to fit alongside the GH5, the fact that lenses can be interchanged including speedboosters and full frame lenses makes the two cameras a nice pairing for me. For the price of an A7Riii you can have two cameras that will hopefully compliment each other quite well.. at least until these FF shenanigans settle down a bit ?

  3. Be careful what you wish for.. ? 

    I can see after sale purchasing of upgrades falling very close to the use of subscriptions.

    The nature of subscription based costs for features can't have gone unnoticed by manufacturers.. I wouldn't want to follow this path, and its the reason I bought the last adobe software (CS5.5/6) when I first heard of their model, and am now moving across to Resolve and other non subscription based platforms for creative work. A lot of adobe users are not happy about the upgrade path of the software they no longer own outright.

×
×
  • Create New...