Andrew Reid

Please show us your A6300 vs NX1 comparison and prove it.

Early adopters have put the Sony A6300 image quality and autofocus to the test - the results are incredible (see below). Could Sony have achieved something very special with their combination of 6K sensor readout and 425 phase detect points? Read the main post

Some good tests there. Have to say both the image and AF look stunning... And very little hint of rolling shutter on the street pans.

Hardly think Blackmagic Pocket Camera price or release date was too much affected by the screen they put in it. Stripping down the Micro, based around same sensor, probably pays for the redesign and faster processor for 60fps.

I love what Sigma are doing and am excited for the 50-100 F1.8 which I am sure will be mega sharp But a Speed Booster solution is definitely better value for money. The XL on Micro Four Thirds for instance is a 0.64x so an F2.8 lens will be F1.8. The E-mount Speed Booster will make F2.8 a F2.0 The Tokina zoom mentioned earlier or the Sigma 50-150mm F2.8 II EX DC APO for APS-C would be the ones to go for. I have the Sigma, it's great.

Nice to see you here Phil! Loved the film.

I think the most forgettable upgrades have been to the Rebel series actually... they make the 80D look like a quantum leap! 600D through 650D, 700D, was embarrassing. It looked like the only feature they added was lower manufacturing cost and at one point a grip material that turned white. Yet the sheep kept buying I assume.

Someone please tell my why a power zoom would adjust focus It doesn't have a focus rocker on it, only a power zoom rocker... Something that should be on the lens for free anyway, like with all the other power zoom lenses from Sony, Panasonic, Samsung, etc. Canon saw yet another money spinning opportunity to charge us for a zoom rocker. Pathetic.

My opinion: http://www.eoshd.com/2016/02/canon-80d-chicken-feed-at-the-mirrorless-banquet/

That's very speculative about the 4K 60fps. Hardly think Sony is protecting the FS7. As an FS5 owner and A7S II owner I can say the consumer line already comes dangerously close to the point of toppling the image quality of their pro cameras. The A6300 is far better than the NX500. No sensor crop. LOG. Likely better low light. 6K readout. Speed Booster. I think it will outperform the NX1 or be very similar, let's wait and see... Not long now.

Ha. Very true.

optical viewfinder is a brilliant idea Check out the Sigma ones. They did a few for different focal lengths on their DP and Quattro cameras. 14mm (21mm equiv.) and 30mm (50mm equiv.) are two I am aware of. And the utterly superb Zeiss finder from the RX1 (35mm equiv.) http://www.amazon.co.uk/Sony-V1K-Optical-Viewfinder-Camera/dp/B009O06XAS/ref=sr_1_2?ie=UTF8&qid=1455806726&sr=8-2&keywords=sony+rx1+viewfinder

Well the Dual Pixel AF isn't just useful for youtube, it's a great tech. Problem is the entire rest of the camera. Nikon will give you better for $500!

Unfortunately not quite D5300 / GH3 good. Canon's new APS-C sensor doesn't have the moire & aliasing control of the former or the resolution / sharpness of the latter. D5500 even better as it has the lovely flat profile and newer sensor, very very clean in the shadows. Canon continue to disappoint - the 80D is basically a non-event, when it could have been a game changer.

Don't get a high end Macbook for that price unless it has dedicated graphics. Iris Pro... no thanks! Has to be Nvidia or AMD for future proof Premiere / Resolve / video editing performance and at least 2GB video RAM. At least. The CPU and all the rest is nowhere near as important as the GPU for video editing.

Yeah the specs are once again very disappointing for video. But we'll see how it does off paper when it comes out. The power zoom on the new 18-135mm is interesting, if a little bulky and likely expensive for something which Sony and Panasonic lenses have had built in for quite a while now at no extra cost.

I have the GTX 970 4GB. It's a bargain. Works brilliantly in Premiere with my NX1 H.265 files. AMD lag behind I believe although I've no direct experience of an AMD card in Premiere.

Does it also remove the viewer's ability to select 1080p manually from the HD button, only giving one option "Auto"? Or just the 'default to HD' on our settings page? Which by the way, was one of the reasons many people upgraded to Plus back in the day.

Something that needs to be explained by Vimeo is why they give us less playback quality than YouTube yet we pay for the privilege of an account. Also their streaming speeds at least from my perspective in Europe have always been atrocious for anything above 720p.

Here's me thinking they were Danish or maybe German all this time... Founded in NYC. Blimey. The ice cream analogy with JVC is spot on. They never quite make the cream of the crop.

They are so desperate to start selling LS300s at CVP that they are giving you a free Olympus 12-40mm F2.8 PRO and £500 off any accessory of your choice. All for £2977 inc VAT (£2481 + VAT) http://cvp.com/index.php?t=product/jvc_gy-ls300e At B&H it is $1000 off at $3k One thing is for sure, doesn't look like sales have been too hot and people aren't hot for the JVC brand. In fact I'd tape it up to avoid being laughed at. I agree on paper the spec is great and the image in that YouTube review looks very very clean in 2K 4:2:2. Nice to have LOG but the prime zoom I'd rather do in post after shooting in 4K. How's the codec in 4K on this thing? What's the bitrate? The main concern I'd have over this camera are the ergonomics, speed of use, snappiness and logic of the menus and quality of the sensor. Will be surprised if it looks nicer than an A7R II in Super 35mm mode at high ISOs or a NX1 at low ISOs. But yeah, definitely a curious beast to try out. Just get it from somewhere with a good return policy. Why? Because it's a JVC

Exactly. This thread has been an interesting marketing lesson for Panasonic! It shows that if they put an over-sized sensor in there then the perception will be that they are dumping Micro Four Thirds standard, even if per my article (which nobody read) they are actually keeping it. Panasonic are in a perfect place to introduce two lens line-ups to one camera system. A dual 2x crop and 1.5x crop system. Small portable M43 lenses and larger coverage S35 glass. If not then we can just sit here and watch Micro Four Thirds die in a market place where you can buy a full frame camera for under $900 with lenses as small as the FE 55mm. Also the RX1R II's optics matched with sensor proves that full frame does not automatically mean massive lenses. The lens on that camera is smaller than most Micro Four Thirds primes. The fact is it is the 2x crop which hurts the GH4 most on the market where it competes with full frame and APS-C Sony cameras, also it is sold into a filmmaking would where 2x crop is a compete NON-STANDARD and Super 35mm is a match for APS-C. Sorry but that makes no sense, Panasonic.

That's a battery drain, a pain to pair every time you turn on the camera and also unreliable, occasionally jerky and mostly pixilated. No thanks However since the Inogeni acts as a capture device, you don't know how much of the workload this takes over from the Android phone or tablet. The Android device might need to do very little with the signal once it has been converted to USB 3 by the capture device, which I am sure has dedicated hardware in it for the job. The general purpose CPU on the tablet probably doesn't need to do much. Just my opinion. If you have any hard evidence why the opposite is true I'd like to hear it and broaden my understanding. I am surprised there's so much chatter about this and so few people willing to just TRY it. No harm in that is there? I am tempted to find one on Amazon and return it if it doesn't work, no harm in trying.

Why is it underrated? The noise? Only so far as what Sony and Metabones are already doing for Canon lens sales I know. Try reading the post. It has to beat the A6300 though, remember. Not to mention differentiate itself with a unique selling point in a crowded market.

Fine for monitoring. Remember idea here is not to compete with an Odyssey 7Q+... It's simply to make use of those lovely thin and portable AMOLED displays on our smartphones and tablets.