Jump to content

Sony FS5 - why I bought one


Andrew Reid
 Share

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, Ak Ns said:

Dear Andrew, i still don't believe you brought this camera with mediocre specs, But i respect your choice. 

No XAVC-I

only 8bit 4:2:0 

100Mbit in 4K[Ultra HD]

No DCIP mode...?

In 1080p its 240fps cache record[Buffering] limited  50Mbit/s bitrate...

 

Why do you always support sony? even though their bad user interphase and very bad skin tones.

 

it has 10bit 422

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Administrators

I wonder what he would use instead at $5k for 4K internal, 4K raw output, 240fps, 13 stop dynamic range LOG recording, Super 35mm sensor and the added bonus of 10bit 4:2:2 internal recording?! Not to mention a built in electronically variable ND filter.

A Canon?!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Andrew Reid said:

I wonder what he would use instead at $5k for 4K internal, 4K raw output, 240fps, 13 stop dynamic range LOG recording, Super 35mm sensor and the added bonus of 10bit 4:2:2 internal recording?! Not to mention a built in electronically variable ND filter.

A Canon?!

To utilise 4k RAW u need to spend 3000$ more. 4k internal is 8bit 4:2:0...!!!? 240fps buffering!!

I am definitely not going to use canon. I use sony A7s and rx10ii. they both do a great job. they both come for 3000$. RX10ii has 240fps buffering, Log recording, 4k internal, Built in ND filter and A7s has very good full HD. With this combination i was able to many jobs. I don't know how worth it is having 4k 8bit 4:2:0 and s-log3 for 6000$.

 

May be i should use it once!

14 hours ago, BrorSvensson said:

it has 10bit 422

 

Sorry i wrote this when i am absolutely drunk. so missed few good things.

9 hours ago, Andrew Reid said:

I wonder what he would use instead at $5k for 4K internal, 4K raw output, 240fps, 13 stop dynamic range LOG recording, Super 35mm sensor and the added bonus of 10bit 4:2:2 internal recording?! Not to mention a built in electronically variable ND filter.

A Canon?!

I already use A7s and RX10ii  combination for most of the works. they both cost me up 3000$. 4k RAW will add me 3000$ more. only thing they both don't have is

10bit 422, that too in Full hd. if its in 4k hell ya its worth every penny. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...