Evgeniy85

There's a bit of post-processing involved in this video too but I do agree it does look great and miles better of other examples posted in this thread. There's a difference between a DP and a person who likes tech and pretty images.

Had Z8 for a spin and it's such a great camera. I wish more companies will go for internal RAW/ProRes recording because h265 doesn't cut it.

Looks pretty good to me. I'm still a fan of catalyst browse stabilization, although I hate the workflow.

Do you think that the mic quality is good enough on ZV-E1 to not use an external mic?

There are plenty of cameras in that price range to choose from. The main perk of this camera is the size and that comes with limitations.

@TomTheDP interesting. That's a very specific niche though, general audience is still watching mainstream films for the most part. The last microbudget film that was popular and made a lot of money was One Cut of The Dead as far as I remember.

10 bit is a must if you shoot in log, in normal profiles you won't see a difference.

Do people expect to film 2 hour interviews with it?

But who watches these films? I mean it's pretty easy to distribute your films these days. A bunch of stuff that I worked on is on Amazon prime and Apple but nobody watches those and I don't think that they made any money.

Please delete my previous post. I thoroughly enjoyed my time with Z9. If it wasn't for physical size, it would be my favorite mirrorless camera ever. I hope some of the video features will make it's way to the new generation of Nikon bodies. All I want is internal ProRes HQ.

http://<iframe width="560" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/sm0w-dWxvao" title="YouTube video player" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture" allowfullscreen></iframe>

Does it record gyroscope data for stabilization in post? It would be weird if they removed it.

H264?

h264?

Thanks. I thought it was considered single focus. I was hoping to use autofocus with it.

Hey guys, I bought slr magic anamorphot 1.33 adaptor and I'm confused about Near/Normal setting. According to description, I need to put it on NORMAL to achieve sharp images at infinity, but it seems that NEAR looks sharper than NORMAL. At NORMAL I can't achieve sharp focus at all. Could that because of the lens? Camera Nikon Z6 in crop mode tested with 28mm and 50mm at 5.6 Thanks.

Nikon Z line has separate settings for photo and video. Not sure about the others.

CST only transforms color space but it doesn't make the camera sensor match better. It's useful for matching luminance if you intend on using the same LUT on both cameras. For your situation, once you get 100% on luminance and WB, use hue vs. hue and hue vs. sat adjustments. People pay more attention to luminance than color differences.

Got myself A7SIII and tested it against A7III. I've noticed that when I record in Slog2 or Slog3, A7III appears brighter despite having the same settings. It's about 1/3 to 1/5 stop brighter than A7SIII. When I shoot with PP off, everything looks the same. Has anyone experienced this issue?