BTM_Pix

The FZ2500 is a lot of bang for the buck. Internal ND, 10 bit 4:2:2 HDMI output if you are going out to a switcher, 200Mbit/s All Intra internal 1080p recording if you're not, comprehensive remote monitoring and control functionality through wifi if you need it, unlimited recording time with SDXC cards (though it does file breaks after 3 hours ), 5 axis OIS etc etc I don't run mine for as extended periods but as far as I'm aware overheating isn't an issue for people that do. A quick reference in the cameralabs test for battery life and heat on a single battery for similar record times that you are looking for https://www.cameralabs.com/panasonic-lumix-fz2000-fz2500-review/

I can't be the only British user to have read the title and thought there was an exciting new addition to the pantheon of chocolate greats I have to say that, as with the Galaxy Caramel, the Galaxy Fold does indeed look very sweet indeed. I actually "oooohhed" when I first saw the unfolding trick. For my use, I'd like to see a tablet that folded out into a laptop rather than a phone which folded out into a tablet.

I think he may have got that wrong. It is global shutter but their site says cmos rather than CCD. http://www.fran8k.com/specs/

Yes. The Rock64, for example, is an SBC that has a USB3 port on it and has the same form factor as a Raspberry Pi so it can use all the same shields (in this case one of the cheap 3.5" touch screens) and can run Open Media Vault for file handling. Combined with the cfast/sata dual reader/writer that I mentioned above you can make a backup device with decent copy speed and an easy interface that will fit in your pocket for less than £100.

If you are looking for a 2.0 reader then I use one of these Roketek ones. The additonal trick it has is that it is also has a sata port that works simultaneously so you can connect bare SSDs to it to do backups. They are about £15 on Amazon.

The issue is the form factor as much as the price in the example that I gave of the Pocket 4K. You could enhance that product and arguably actually make it even smaller or at the very least a different shape to make it less problematic for a gimbal. The move for someone into a much larger form factor like an FS7/UMP entails everything else getting bigger in terms of tripod, power etc so it then becomes a different overall proposition. This also follows on with the lenses as well of course by retaining the MFT mount so it can use small native lenses but also of course adapt pretty much everything else on to it. I suppose the real test of this is if BM announced a more Z Cam E2 style version of the Pocket4K at NAB with the additions I'm looking at for £3-3.5K would it get a few orders? I think it might do. You never know, maybe they will !

Ah. Thanks

Yes it does but be aware that when you are using app control of a Fuji camera then the camera itself is limited to only being able to record at 720p resolution.

I'm hoping that a small company pops-up that takes the internals of stock cameras and re-houses them with custom integrated add ons to make 'new' products. There is definitely the scope for someone to take the guts of Pocket 4K for example and create something in a different but still compact form factor that sits in that £3-3.5K area that addresses what people are asking for with regard to internal electronic ND, better audio interface, power, an EVF etc The volume may not be there for manufacturers to make something like that but there may well be enough demand for a small company to make a living from it.

Oh hello...

If you have to do something custom and are concerned about doing the soldering (especially when trying to work out the connections) then these solderless terminal connectors are useful You would then buy a 4 pole to 4 pole 2.5mm cable, cut the cable in half, strip the wires and put them into the terminals to make the connections. https://www.amazon.co.uk/kwmobile-2-5mm-Balun-Converter-Adapter-Black/dp/B07NDGYSGB/ref=sr_1_3?ie=UTF8&qid=1550527647&sr=8-3&keywords=2.5mm+balun+converter As you get two terminal adapters in the pack and you've cut your 4 pole cable in half you will then be able to make up 2 of the correct cables. Once you've established what the connections are then you can have someone make up something more permanent. Or just gaffa tape the hell out of the lashed up ones

In my defence, it is late and I am old

Ooops!!! Well spotted ! Yes, cancel that order @thephoenix

Yes, if you get really, really lucky that might actually work as is. If it doesn't then you've got a handy cable to connect a Rode video mic to an iPad !

In a funny way, as we are coming up to the first anniversary of its announcement, it would be more understandable if they hadn't shipped any yet or had only just started shipping. I agree that it seems unusual that they actually started to get them out of the door not far off on schedule but are still not readily available almost six months later. I'm hoping this is just a perception thing and that they've actually shipped a gazillion as I've got an app to sell for it next week

Yeah, I think they could do something that plugs into the side in one go along the lines of this one for the OG Pocket to take the HDMI,USBC and Shutter release down in a straight line into an under camera grip (as opposed to breakouts like this) which has all of the clever stuff in.

Looking at the page for the run/stop cables for the Nucleus Nano ( https://tilta.com/shop/nucleus-nano-run-stop-cables/ ) the controller end (on the right in this picture) is a 4 pole jack With the Fuji release cable, it is a 3 pole You might get lucky by using a 2.5mm 3 pole to 3 pole cable from the camera and putting a 4 pole adapter on the end into the controller. Otherwise it will be a case of rolling your own by measuring what is coming off each pole when you do the run/stop from the controller and re-wiring the 3 pole connector going into the camera to match what the Fuji is expecting. The pinout for the Fuji is the same as for Canon, which you will find here http://www.doc-diy.net/photo/remote_pinout/index.php An alternative would be to buy the Panasonic version and make an adapter and, again, the pinout for the Panasonic is at the same link.

Philip Reeve is a good resource https://phillipreeve.net/blog/ It is more geared towards individual tests but there are quite a lot of comparison ones too such as this 35mm one https://phillipreeve.net/blog/35mm-comparison-voigtlander-zeiss-leica/ In a more aesthetic direction, Shutterdial might be an interesting resource for you to browse based on what sort of attributes you need though. Its not a completely EXIF based search engine for Flickr but it works quite well in terms of suggestive searching along with additional selection of focal length, aperture and shutter speed. Here, for example, I've searched for indoor Takumar shots taken at f2 http://www.shutterdial.com/#/search?s=takumar indoor&a=5 So you can browse the images then click on them to go through to it on Flickr to see the full EXIF.

A quick rough output of the app doing zoom/focus control of the cheap and less than stellar and not in any way par focal Panasonic 14-42mm lens on a Pocket 4K. Video shows servo zoom, snap focus between two memory points and transition between two memory points.

It is definitely useful to approach it that way if the goal is to provide it as a test for people looking to evaluate those particular lenses. You could split hairs and say that even in RAW the camera will still be in play in terms of influence but every single lens test/example on this thread is subject to that (and worse because a majority are not shot in RAW) so you'll still be ahead of the game there! More broadly though, I had interpreted, incorrectly I think, that what you were wanting to do was more in pursuit of how those lenses worked for your own personal taste/needs hence why I thought it would be appropriate to run a stepped variable parameter test under the colour profile(s) you would be using on your GH5 to give it a more representative context. Unless you've found a way to shoot RAW video on it That approach would also have had value if you were trying to create a cohesive matching set from a disparate bunch of lenses so, for example, you might find that you prefer overall performance of the Minolta 135mm over the Takumar 135mm but that it lacks a touch of contrast that would closer align it to the other Takumar focal lenses but with +1 contrast in the profile it can bring it into line etc etc You may well find some magic combinations that way. Or at least rule out the shit ones !

Thanks. The short answer is 'with a hell of a lot of graft' BM produce a camera control spec document so you have the foundation to work from with a couple of example protocol packets but its a long slog creating all of the tables and sitting a control mechanism on top of them that makes sense as a user interface and then dealing with changes made by the user on the camera itself and and and and... That's why I'm going to be charging £4943 per copy for it

My narrative? I'm looking at it from the perspective of describing what has actually happened in the process of trying to prepare for that and the well documented reasons for it, so it is commentary rather than narrative. To be honest, the idea that the current deadlocked situation has been brought about by a fifth column of Remainers within the government or parliament as a whole would actually be a better example of a narrative. And it is a narrative that is somewhat undermined by the fact that 81% of MPs voted to trigger Article 50 which ratified the referendum result by giving the EU official notice of the UK exiting and set in law that we would do so on March 29th 2019. Anyway, like the UK, I'm out. I thought you'd become an early casualty of it as we haven't heard from you for a while FlyBMI are better described as being the 'latest' rather than the 'earliest' but there is a bit of wood for the trees stuff going on with all of these announcements. There is no doubt it is a factor but whether it is the primary factor or just the straw that broke the camel's back is open to debate. Its probably the latter in this instance. With Nissan, moving production away from a UK plant who's output will be subject to an import tariff into the EU to a plant in their own country which, thanks to the new EU/Japan trade deal, won't be is a bit more clear cut.

It was indentified as spam as the orginal poster has a record of 2 posts both of which contain the same dubious link embedded in them. So unfortnuately your helpful reply to him/her/it will be falling on deaf ears. Or audio sensors if its a bot.

OK

Its not an interpretation though. The default position in law is that the UK will exit the EU on 29th March so it is definitely going to happen. Any arrangement to agree a trade deal with the EU that kicks in on the 30th of March is incidental to that so the result of the referendum will be actioned irrespective of who is in charge. May cannot get her deal through Parliament because she can't persuade her own party to support it. She lost that vote by the biggest margin ever seen in Parliament due to large blocks of her own party not backing it and then promptly won a vote of no confidence in the government the next day because those self same people voted to back her. Putting party before country has never been more evident than that. Considering that what 'sort' of Brexit was originally voted for in the referendum can't be agreed upon by those who wanted it and has seen a constant shifting of goalposts by those who agitated and campaigned for it, there is scant evidence that the most rabid Leavers would have fared any differently. The appetite for the two lead Tories of the Leave campaign, Boris Johnson and Michael Gove, to actually have any sort of leading role in delivering it once they won speaks volumes for what a poisoned chalice it is. There is also a shocking degree of inherent incompetence that has infested our politicians over the past 20 years that means the whole process has been pretty agnostic to the Leave/Remain leanings of those charged with implementing it. When the actual government minister for exiting the European Union (and rabid Brexiteer) haplessly and shamelessly admitted that he hadn't actually appreciated how important the Dover-Calais freight link was then you know you are in trouble. What was 'won' with Brexit was an idea or ideal but what was never there was any sort of detailed or cohesive plan to deliver that and what would happen when their ideal met some real hard facts. What we are seeing now that that reality presents itself is a blame game to try and shift responsibility on to Remainers in the government and the EU itself rather than accept that when you promise unicorns then you have to own that and actually deliver them.