Nrubloc

No indication of what he ultimately paid, but he did mention previously the initial offer was for 2600 UK Pounds.

I guess to make it even less “offensive” instead of using the ‘developing world’ nomenclature, they moved on from that last year. It was then decided that it would be more appropriate to now use the phrase ‘emerging (market) economies’ instead for such locations, so there is less confusion about what is being described or discussed going forward. I know it’s a lot to keep up with all these changes, along with all the other things going on in the world at this time, but it is what it is.

I guess to make it even less “offensive” instead of using the ‘developing world’ nomenclature, they moved on from that last year. It was then decided that it would be more appropriate to now use the phrase ‘emerging (market) economies’ instead for such locations, so there is less confusion about what is being described or discussed going forward. I know it’s a lot to keep up with all these changes, along with all the other things going on in the world at this time, but it is what it is.

Nice... Thanks for the LUT free image example. Looks definitely manageable, especially in controlled lighting conditions. Look forward to seeing any video you put together using this color profile.

a7sII

Investing in a team is much harder and more risky but it is the right decision.

Let the healing begin.... Maybe people can soon start to learn who they are.

This model is already nearly a year old. I think I will wait for the new version instead.

Seems a few wrinkles have developed in the opportunity to view/show the film "Hateful Eight" in 70mm at a Cinerama Dome location in LA. It seems Disney wants Star Wars to be shown instead, during the holiday season....
Quentin Tarantino slams Disney over 'Star Wars' 'extortion' on 'Howard Stern'
 
 

Perhaps the A7sII will also gain S-Log3 and 10-bit output..... yes please.

Perhaps the A7sII will also gain S-Log3 and 10-bit output..... yes please.

Yes, it does appear to be the same lens referred to in the thread you mentioned. Keep in mind; the one used and mentioned by QuickHitRecord was modified to have a shorter focus throw instead of having to turn the barrel 5 complete revolutions to travel from infinity to close focus. Seems interesting and a rather convenient modification especially given the close focusing capability of this lens without the use of diopters.
Pricing seems to be all over the place as usual and I am sure a good deal could be found at some point. The ones I have seen under/around $100 tend to have little issues with the optics such a scratches or light fungus. So I think above that is realistic currently. Actually, there are a few online now ranging from $165-$499(overpriced for the latter IMO). As mentioned in the thread link above, some ask unrealistic prices and my feeling is that they are not really that rare at all.