Jump to content

Xavier Plagaro Mussard

Members
  • Posts

    632
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Xavier Plagaro Mussard

  1. Hopefully it should help eliminating the walking bounce that many small gimbal have, have to wait for the actual footage to see it if actually works

    I am no expert in mechanics, but if it is spring loaded it can be tuned to eliminate the walking bounce, then probably it won't work with higher frequency bounces like in a car. 

  2.  

    Unfortunately the camera provides no thermal trend indicators, so you cannot monitor how close to the limit it's getting.

    That's the problem. Probably the first car didn't have a gas-meter. But you must know what temperature you are at and at what temperature the thing stops!

  3. You get full stabilised shots, so some "bouncing", probably due to poor walking technique, is more than acceptable. The OIS on lens or some stabilisation in post probably correct it 100%. I still haven't buyed anything but I am searching. Buying in Europe is a PITA.

    The H1+ would probably prefer a NX500 to a NX1!

  4. Because people would still put it in the oven and complain it overheats. Welcome to modern marketing (and politics by the way).  

    I can't understand your position. You propose that you either accept or not?? You must buy a camera that may or not record based on warming conditions which you can't control in any way. Then Sony should put a thermometer in every camera and tell you: "when it's at 50ºC you have 5 more minutes". 

    thermometer-05.jpg

  5. The word is DEFECTIVE!

    Imho, defective is not the word, it's a limit of the camera. What's unacceptable is that it is not written black on white on the specs. Specs should report the minimum time you can expect to record without overheating problems. I also wonder how this whole overheating thing will affect the sensor and if the IQ will remain the same or if it will worsen with repeated use. 

    That said, thanks to the OP for proposing a couple of partial solutions!

  6. Do you want to experiment with an anamorphic lens or do you want to be able to shoot everytime with an anamorphic lens?? To experiment can be cheap. To have a fully functioning (ability to manual focus) anamorphic setup is expensive! 

  7. Does anyone have an opinion on the Panasonic FZ1000 versus the RX10m2? In the UK at least the Panasonic is half the price. It has the same size sensor & the lens is an F2.8-4.0 25-400mm equivalent. It doesn't have the HFR but what other advantages does it have to justify the 2X price?

    Let's put it this way: your clients will never know! 

    If you need HFR and can pay the difference, why not?? For the rest of us, the FZ1000 is probably good enough. I have an LX100 and would love to get an FZ1000 to compliment it!

×
×
  • Create New...