Emanuel

I don't find Phantom 4 any better than Mavic. I find Mavic better than the phantom 4, gopro, etc with their oversharpened settings.
I agree with Pavel.

Here's a curious Mavic Pro / GoPro Hero 5 / Phantom 4 / Phantom 3 camera comparative:
 




 

 


 

 

Indeed. It is not the first time this has been noticed.
Because of manual focus? Lens design flaw/issue (remember that's not rare or it is even common to occur with anamorphic lenses, mostly affordable ones) or QC case to comprehend only a part of the production as same as seems to have occurred with Nokia Lumix 1020?

In certain cases, yes, as it seems to clearly be the case here:
 
 

ISO1600 footage:
Would GoPro ever offer such noiseless night pictures of same or similar kind? ; )
 
Frankly, jury still rules out to yet have seen...
I'd honestly appreciate to see it !
;-)

From new buyers with their fresh videos (the first ones, as for instance, plainly shows where the footage can shine and where not mainly because of a limited codec with such low bitrate : )
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Two clips with Bloom's settings:
 
 
I find it even funny when people complain about sharpness. With this last one, for example, I am using a laptop display 1366 pixels wide. I need to go from 1080p file to 720p file if I want avoid aliasing.
To those who haven't seen yet the Cinema5D review, still from Lisbon DJI event:
 
 
And the next ones to those who have wondered about its narrative use.
 
Tagged as Mavic Pro aerial footage:
 
 
 
:-)

From new buyers with their fresh videos (the first ones, as for instance, plainly shows where the footage can shine and where not mainly because of a limited codec with such low bitrate : )
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Two clips with Bloom's settings:
 
 
I find it even funny when people complain about sharpness. With this last one, for example, I am using a laptop display 1366 pixels wide. I need to go from 1080p file to 720p file if I want avoid aliasing.
To those who haven't seen yet the Cinema5D review, still from Lisbon DJI event:
 
 
And the next ones to those who have wondered about its narrative use.
 
Tagged as Mavic Pro aerial footage:
 
 
 
:-)

Don't be... : )
https://www.peauproductions.com/collections/gopro-camera-lenses
Hero 5 will come :-)

Sad to come and pee on the parade... the introduction is pretty straight, though:
 

So I got like the cheapest lens I could, and now it’s the only one I like. “Character” or crap, I love it. Just a non-ai 50mm with a $10 wide angle adapter. I have a telephoto adapter too, which definitely still has character, but not always my favorite. I like this even more than the 50 by itself. Didn’t know if there were just terrible cheap lenses anywhere that could be worth fiddling with. usually the budget lenses are still somewhat high for me. Kinda curious about fungus filled lenses, I’ve seen those do cool things
 
Ps, i know that those Dog Optiks are nice n Schidtty, and I appreciate the hell out of them, but maybe mostly interested from the cheapskate side of things, so /:

Cute Baby Girl Liam    !!!

before i saw this video i was still of the opinion that karma still have certain advantage like using the GoPro cam itself on and off the drone/stabiliser.....then i saw this ...i truly worry for them.... 
two things hit em the hardest, A) the drone is all over the place, B) i didnt realise the karma drone is so heavy.

Oh my goodness, you will not build a narrative only with it, will you?

Oh dear, the karma:
 

If there is only a marginal image difference between the two then due to the size differences it might well come down to that old adage that the best camera in any situation is the one you've got with you.
The Mavic is very seductive to me because of that form factor. Even a 'small' drone like the Phantom ends up only being taken out when you specifically know you're going to do aerial stuff - and often only aerial stuff - as its not something you can pop in your bag on the off chance. Completely different proposition with the Mavic.
The Karma might long term prove to be the better platform as you can change the camera but the Mavic looks the better product today to me.

Not bad. Nevertheless, I like Mavic better than gopro.

So, after seeing that video it's an easy decision for me...The "camera IQ pixel peeping" thing has no point when "one" of the compared devices doesn't work as advertised. GoPro will probably adress some of these bugs through firmware updates but you can't turn a potato into a strawberry with software quirks... The bad thing though, that makes me kinda sad, is that there is still no company that can compete with DJI. Monopoly is never a "good" thing. When software updates will get messy in many ways (as it happened many many times before with Phantoms), which company will give us an alternative?

In Italy? Si, certo : ) But, to whom wants better IQ, why Phantom or Karma...? C'mon :-)

It is legit :-)
Here are other links with interesting and useful info on topic:
http://www.shainblumphoto.com/2016/09/30/dji-mavic-vs-phantom-4-dng/
http://visual-aerials.com/mavicpro.html

Seems legit: 
 

This time from my native country...
BTW, that Roman temple seen on DJI video presentation is also a Portuguese location [ LINK ]

Sure. No one will build up a film narrative 100% based on a 400mm focal length, as for instance... ; )
Your concern is fair enough, though :-)