Emanuel

My dear, I did it and will watch once more for several times to come I am sure, including on a 4K projector BTW : ) Absolutely mandatory to have it @ big screen : -)

On YT since just three days ago... Quite sincerely, don't expect for NAB '20! LOL ; -)

I find f/1.8 pretty fast enough nowadays on the best sensor performance available today of MFT size per se, go figure... LOL : -)

Glenn's club standard ; ) Seems he's not alone on that one, well, I fully understand his call anyways : -) At least, you'll be sure then he won't let you down from the other side when St. Peter : P will ask you about that bald dude with the cat in in his back : D Better a pretty rare one than just another pet you can find in any store of the neighborhood ; -) @mercer

Absolutely astonishing.

And here's a grab from that clip (handheld shot! : -)

According to the technical info: <<The clips were recorded at 1488x1900 pixels and were resized to 4464x1900 using lanczos algorithm. Grading is done in MLVApp only. No LUT was used. Gear: Canon EOS M Viltrox Speedbooster EF 16-35mm 2.8 USM L II Variable ND filter Cullmann Nanomax 290 Monopod>> Here's another 5K anamorphic mode test from one of Danne's builds: Impressive definition from such hack UHD trick...

This location is an oasis...

Your framing/composition, that is, your directing work is WELL above the average, you're an artist, girl, I believe we are all proud of you : ) My hat! Your movie deserves much more than YT, go to arthouse film festival circuit, you're giving new pictures and sounds (with such finest sound design) to the world. Credits apply BTW, the crew is not irrelevant at all when we watch something of this caliber : -) I imagine you have now a lot of people either trying to date you : D or be somehow doing anything to be connected with you. You are far to be just another anonymous camper here or anywhere else (E ; -)

With a LUT from the usual suspect our good fellow @ZEEK who has also added this piece in the meantime:

No idea why this is so ignored: https://www.eoshd.com/comments/topic/28146-blackmagic-pocket-4k-media-power-thread-the-best-alternatives/?do=findComment&comment=264463

Well, it depends : ) All batteries will prone to die without regular suitable use and charge. As well, everyone are subject to further complaints, OEM's included. The price varies according to the capacity. For example, in this case, Patona doubles the VHBW price for identical power capacity. Perhaps because of their tiptop marketing, I guess. RAVPower has the best quality/price ratio out there going along their pack of two + USB dual charger. Even more affordable than the VHBW offer where only from three units on takes any advantage for bulk purchase. Without mention they can't be compared at all to the cheap white label product. I mean all of them above-mentioned. : -)

Here's another power solution as much mobile as possible. In conclusion, better than 1300mAh and less expensive than the Patona Premium route, my odds settle down to the usual suspect of nowadays, that is, the renown RAVPower brand with their identical 2000mAh pack offer for 30 pounds to include 2x batteries and the USB dual charger.

Keep going that discussion up there in that other thread... Once their dual USB chargers look like twin brothers, I would even dare to say it is quite possible they're manufactured in the same place...

Wasabi Power as first choice: VHBW as 2nd option route mainly in Europe where you won't easily find Wasabi:

@webrunner5 Now imagine all that red in the middle of such landscapes from where my roots literally came... where this 'used car salesman' : D *unforgettable* LOL still keeps a vineyard family business today : -) To those who love such real reddie good oldies, here's the following episode from this 900-years country of history: where you can figure the English accent as foreign language of this thread host now of yours, by native-Portuguese-English-speakers-n-ultimate-car-lovers in this virtual world we all live in : ) Cameras are like cars, the finest vineyard or Oporto wine... never become old fashioned : -)

LOL Little devil you, old pirate ; -) Not mine but one of these days I'll post a comparison test comprehending P4K with ML Canons 5D2 & M : -)

I never go higher than ISO 6400, ISO 3200 if possible, ISO 1600 as much as possible. I shot last night some event pretty low light (available street light) with the P4K within such limits.

Well, I don't think such high ISOs are even any useful or makes much sense IMO.

I love Canon outcome no matter what : ) Well, no less any BMD ; -)

Glad I never sold my 2009 unit. Still in mint condition as always... Solid as a tank. With ML that became a new motion picture capture device aliasing free: https://www.magiclantern.fm/forum/index.php?topic=23632.0

Here's another curious input on 360º shooting and YT channel generic shooting related though BTW:

Here's more footage from customary sources. WOW these guys monetize anything... Now, even licensed scores LOL : -) That said, I'd rather have better colour science. Let's keep it in mind it is still a prototype. Resolution seems interesting for extreme detail landscape wide shots for post abilities potentiality all included, though : ) As someone already said, it is sharp, at least : -D

Interesting YT channel for 360º gear reviews BTW : -)