Emanuel

Bale forgot to grab a jacket for his head, those reviewers up there instead got them all ; -) Another interesting comparison from TVS PRO: These guys have much interesting comparative tests there, I invite everyone to take a look on their YT channel. They are even known for their upgraded factory settings such as their Theo version: https://www.tvspecialists.com/introducing-theo-z65-lite/ Here's an useful thread on topic: https://www.avsforum.com/forum/24-digital-hi-end-projectors-3-000-usd-msrp/3086184-theo-z65-upgraded-optoma-uhz65-owners-thread.html

Here's also a couple of useful info on topic: https://www.projectorreviews.com/the-art-of-home-theater-projectors/fauxk-vs-4k-projectors-look-true-4k-4k-uhd-1080p-pixel-shifters/ https://www.projectorcentral.com/4k-projectors-defined.htm

To each its own. I feel exactly that about all those complicated menus. A pain in the ass. That simply cuts off all my pleasure to shoot with. Blackmagic has brought me the feeling of a real film camera back. I love their approach to put the shooter in the focus of their camera design, not just another user in the digital age or ENG field. They have made digital cinema cameras instead. I come back from 35mm and 16mm realm. This really counts to me : ) IQ wise I practically am able to reproduce anything I want. Secondary today IMO : -)

No other lens mount system gives you that for such affordable peanuts price ; -)

So get used to P6K... Its user interface has no parallel with anything else at all : ) I am user of both systems, apples to oranges : -) Blackmagic's tool gives you back the pleasure to shoot on film again throughout the digital age.

discussion here

It's a zero issue, trust me, you can mark my words and the usual suspects save their hate against RED... LOL : P I speak by myself attached to my T5 1TB ; ) And FYI or all of those who may eventually have no notice yet of his presence here, Mihail @cpc the developer himself is among us in this community : -)

Directly to camera samples on second 700:

Here's the 1st bunch of field payload tests popping up as predicted last week: And more tests with the stock camera where the 2.7K resolution seems perfectly balanced offering less crisp outcome comparing with the previous models IMHO: The less saturation the better to my eyes as well:

The case is so sensitive that the thread I had opened a couple of hours ago on reduser should have beaten the record because vanished from the air right away... LOL ; -) http://www.reduser.net/forum/showthread.php?179183-RED-patents&p=1875811#post1875811

Waynes, apart my non-native English, I'll try to apply for the best of my plain English : D Apple's lawyers work in this case is perfectly shitty if we discount the agreement settled. Let alone when compared with RED's legal team strictly under their own IP protection task force. That's where the whole problem resides IMO. A competent legal work would break and kill those RED RAW patents as clear as I hope these words may sound to you now ! ; -)

Done: http://www.reduser.net/forum/showthread.php?179183-RED-patents&p=1875811#post1875811 http://www.reduser.net/forum/showthread.php?179139-Apple-RED&p=1875812&viewfull=1#post1875812 Interesting post some other above BTW: http://www.reduser.net/forum/showthread.php?179139-Apple-RED&p=1875807&viewfull=1#post1875807 : -)

Exactly the point and what I meant in my text. 'Through' means to apply from there. A service available from any country's IP office in order to extent it worldwide. Of course, that's why I've been questioning about their legal team in these pages... Sorry folks for my lack of modesty, but as professional either as producer or legal expert, I take my job up to limit. I am always unsatisfied with the outcome of my effort. I think pretty mediocre what I see from theirs. Lame. They should start to hire some better staff indeed. As far as I know and I've realized, this has been one of the secret ingredients by RED since ever : -)

Or Graham Bell family would have a bit of trouble to charge Xiaomi for any new model each two weeks.

You're right Waynes : ) There is some other issue involving 24fps which is a standard* adopted for almost a whole previous century along and a standard wide known and used by the industry for decades, which impedes to recognise the innovation attribute any patent claims to be. Thus, some restrictions must apply. The exclusion is there and coverage or patent range only partially extent at least. I am pretty sure a better legal work in different jurisdictions would kill such claim, IMHO as post graduate precisely to comprehend this legal field as well : -) * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High_frame_rate#History_of_frame_rates_in_cinema

Exactly, even though I guess they had applied for worldwide protection from US IP office, the fact is some other authority can have some other perspective on their patent validity if any, range and coverage. Compressed RAW is almost as wide as vanilla ice cream, as someone has already noticed and sarcasm aside, so: This is the most perfect example why this is still far to be definitive. I guess they should invest more in their legal department instead... Only one particular case AFAIK, old story from the previous thread discussion. No big deal. The point is when whose understanding is restrictively B&W, truly a pity, ending with the whole matter upside down : -D

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Motion_Picture_Patents_Company#Creation Ironically, that's how Hollywood was born... Where Indie spirit rose up! : P Useless battle at a certain point or degree, sooner or later, to just one side IMHO (gang, don't be party poopers! LOL : -)