sandro

I never tried zooming with a non Samsung lens since I don't have one but I don't see why it would do it...

That would explain it.

Still doesn't explain why on manual the shift is for 1 second only.

But shouldn't that increase stay the same? Instead with the Samsung lens I used it goes back to "normal" after a moment.

Does.it really prevent current hacking?

Is it possibile to see this NR difference between nx500 and nx1 somehow on the same scene?I didn't spot this difference.

yeah but that it's supposed to be without NR... I'm starting to wonder if Samsung used that aggressive NR for a good reason...

What ISO? But seriously if this is below 6400 the NX1 really sucks in low light... nothing NR off can solve...

So its the lenses.

how can it be if it happens even when everything is all manual? If doesn't have to adjust to anything.

I believe it's a design of these electronically controlled lenses. It's disappointing it happens with a S lens...

I don't think hdds configuration makes that much of difference. Yes you can get less jumps between different clips if positioned distant on the HDD because it needs to seek on the platters. SSD removes that problem. BUT I don't think you will humanly notice any difference. For these applications where the CPU is always the limit hdd speed is negligible considerand that most reach 100MB/s at least.

My 18-200 does the same, if I set the aperture to 6.3 while zooming out it sightly opens and then closes down to 6.3. Annoying and not acceptable for "video" lens.

http://***URL removed***/forums/thread/4001686 330Mbit hack. I don't see any difference for 3200 though... (NR wise)

@kidzrevil I'm confused, if I stay at 150-160Mbit do these problem occur also? I mean freezes and stuff.

How much is the focal length multiplier with DIS on? I wish the higher bitrate would also allow a better low light performance. At least a ISO3200 without those horrible lines.

DIS can't be used on non Samsung lenses right?

Does DIS work OK with higher bitrate or it doesn't affect it in any way?

I see, you could try with this tool https://www.attotech.com/disk-benchmark/ and check if you see a pattern. There must be a block size used while writing files that could explain the "slow" speeds.

SD card speed depends a lot on the controlled used by the reader/host. And of course the kind of test you're doing. @outerbeat when you record video the camera will use sequential writes not random 4K why are you interested in that?

Now I have another question. Is there a way to develop smartphone apps or web apps for the NX1? Or directly "apps" on the NX1? I want to develop one.

Not sure what to say at this point.

I'm not sure how he turned NR off on the nx500? I'm downloading the video file now... UPDATE: I've seen the video, well the noise is definitely there but it's there in a way that makes me think it's the sensor design that it's not good in low light. Agreed that it's 6400 but isn't the a6300 clear at that ISO? Even the Nikons at 6400 don't look that bad.

how do you use them with the nx1 without slog?

It is a shame to have a camera in 2015 with usable ISO at only 1600.