Jump to content

Leaderboard

Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation on 08/10/2012 in all areas

  1. sanveer

    China in Attack Mode

    I would not have believed this, till i saw it. For everyone wondering what the whole fuss about over-priced, too soft, fast primes was, this may be the answer you were looking for. Apparently, Mitakon has been manufacturing the lenses for SLR Magic, and that is perhaps, where they got the precise know-how from. SLR Magic produces the 50mm f.95 (actually T.95), which is Much Sharper than the Voigtlander 25mm f.95. The only issues it had, during tests, was the strong purple fringing (chromatic aberration). Otherwise, it was almost as sharp as the Leica, at a fraction of the cost. While the SLR Magic retails for US$ 1100, for the 50mm f.95, the Mitakon 35mm f.95 retails for around 600 Euros (approx 736 US$). [url="http://www.sonyalpharumors.com/first-mitakon-35mm-f0-95-image-samples-not-bad/"]http://www.sonyalpharumors.com/first-mitakon-35mm-f0-95-image-samples-not-bad/[/url] [url="http://www.personal-view.com/talks/discussion/3951/35mm-f0.95-mitakon/p1"]http://www.personal-view.com/talks/discussion/3951/35mm-f0.95-mitakon/p1[/url] Maybe its time, that Lens Manufacturers Stop outsourcing to China, and, more importantly, start reducing their unjustified pricing.
    1 point
  2. I think that by suggesting that the OP write off all anamorphic lenses except for the Iscoramas, you're making it evident that you have been missing out on a lot great anamorphic action. There are anamorphic lenses with a lot more character out there. Even the ultra-low budget filmmakers (and I fall into this category) can create great images with these. [quote name='Jimbawb' timestamp='1344627091' post='15279'] The main question is 'would general audiences be happy to watch a film where the majority of the whole pciture is filled with black?' the answer is probably not.[/quote] Agreed. I would not want to sit through a 3.55:1 feature. It IS better suited for short films. [quote name='Jimbawb' timestamp='1344627091' post='15279'] So Mondo, if you have an HD camera that shoots 4:3 natively then this lens could be perfect! In fact if thats true, you must tell us all which camera that is!![/quote] The GH2 can be hacked and made to record in 4:3 natively. The drawback is that the last time I checked, it was only available at 30 frames per second. I am considering shooting a short film with a the Hypergonar because I like the look so much. I currently have it on a shoulder rig and with a +1 diopter I can focus between 3'9" and 4'3" (image attached). I focus with my legs; just walk in or out until I see pores. Difficult, but that just means that fewer people are going to try it -- and that makes it all the more appealing to me. Envious of the Alexa. One day I will get there.
    1 point
  3. [quote name='Jimbawb' timestamp='1344617323' post='15273'] [i]Hey Mondo, just a warning, don't go buying a lens like the one in the link above, it's a projector lens and ain't no good for shooting![/i] [/quote] I respectfully disagree with you! I have sucessfully used these lenses for 7 years now! this lens is stunning! it cost over $5000 , the lens was made reciently by Schneider in Germany to project 35mm Hollywood Blockbuster movies in multiplexes! Its industrial quality stunningly sharp modern glass , focuses down to 10 feet with no diopter and is only 14cm long. The images from this lens are Canon L Series quality!! super sharp superb glass! This is not some 1970's 16mm old glass rubbish made for home cinema! here is the Schneier only Tecnoir Cinema Rig [img]http://i42.photobucket.com/albums/e307/blackmore1/IMG_0011.jpg[/img]
    1 point
  4. [quote name='Jimbawb' timestamp='1344617323' post='15273'] Hey Mondo, just a warning, don't go buying a lens like the one in the link above, it's a projector lens and ain't no good for shooting![/quote] I respectfully disagree. I don't know about the lens above but my Hypergonar HiFi-2 is a 35mm film projection lens and though it is difficult to use (heavy, dual focusing, requires a diopter), I think that it creates a fantastic image; among the best that I have seen. I prefer it to Iscorama. No one uses these lenses to make their lives easier but I believe that the extra mile really goes a long way. Here are some samples of the same subject that I shot in succession with some of my lenses that you may find to be helpful in your search: [media]http://vimeo.com/42505123[/media] I have some other videos up with footage from later acquisitions, and there are hundreds of them out there by other people as well. I'd recommend looking at as much footage as you can before making a decision. Good luck!
    1 point
  5. Hey Mondo, just a warning, don't go buying a lens like the one in the link above, it's a projector lens and ain't no good for shooting! You're looking around $3 - 4,000 for an iscorama 36 (which seems to be what everyone is after) I'm looking to hire one not buy. So if you're bidding on anything under $2,000 it's probably not worth bidding for?! Hope that helps at all?
    1 point
  6. definitively does sound very promising what a crazy time we are living in, affordable high quality cameras just seem to keep coming one after the other. Also with the release of creative cloud we get the full range of needed software for cheap. I really feel lucky to have so much at my disposal to be creative looking forward to read more about this camera
    1 point
×
×
  • Create New...