Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

A look at raw video on the Canon 600D

54 posts in this topic

Posted · Report post

Canon 600D raw video

 

Download the sample DNG frames from continuous raw video on the 600D

Though most of the development at Magic Lantern has been focussed on the powerful 5D Mark III, the latest firmware builds have also been ported to the 600D. How does it perform for raw video?

[url=http://www.eoshd.com/content/10421/a-look-at-raw-video-on-the-canon-600d]Read the full article here[/url]

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

No information about 60D? ML are genius, I hope they will do this for 60D.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

If 960x720 would work, that would be perfect for 2x anamorphic with 2,66:1 aspect ratio.

 

Can you try a shot at 960x480p with a 2x anamorphic? That would give a pretty extreme 4:1 aspect ratio at 1920x480, but probably look pretty good!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

I'm not sure if anyone notices, but I just did a test w/ these files (thanks, Andrew) upscaled to 1920 horiz-pix and the resolution clarity is effectively comparable to super 16mm film! Almost exactly, in fact. The same soft-sharpness. I'll do an upload of the image shortly. This is a FANTASTIC breakthrough!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

Phillip (lol) did some tests

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KcRmqYJp-i8

 

from another guy

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BGUfHP4QRLI

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

Very satisfied with this. An awesome look for low budget indies or to cut alongside higher resolution super35 footage. ML has inadvertently created a super 16 raw frame just from the Digic 4's SD card setbacks. And it's awesome!

8749951513_7a2b65371c_h.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

Not liking that test.

Grabbed the frames Andrew uploaded and upscaled to 1280x640. Really nice. Raw also gives you the ability to add some "clarity" giving you a bit more perceived detail in the shot.

Looks great to me.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

[URL=http://s407.photobucket.com/user/MOE-GUNZ-JACKSON/media/600D1.jpg.html]600D1.jpg[/URL]

[URL=http://s407.photobucket.com/user/MOE-GUNZ-JACKSON/media/600D2.jpg.html]600D2.jpg[/URL]

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

Too bad -- I was hoping for full 1,920 x 1,080, 24p raw on the 600D/T3i. Now that would have been an even bigger game changer. Oh, well.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

Too bad -- I was hoping for full 1,920 x 1,080, 24p raw on the 600D/T3i. Now that would have been an even bigger game changer. Oh, well.

 

A little greedy my dear sir XD

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

Too bad -- I was hoping for full 1,920 x 1,080, 24p raw on the 600D/T3i. Now that would have been an even bigger game changer. Oh, well.

 

Hang on. Why are you taking early pre-alpha dev code like it is a final conclusion?

 

A bit early to judge no?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

I think the only drawback is the SD card transfer limit. i´ve got a 6D. will magic lantern able to convert the raw file to a prores or DNG directly from the camera to sd card? ML is the real game changer in this all revolution :) 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

6D is reaching 40MB/s. Double 600D, but still half of what common 1000x CF cards achieve on the 5D Mark III (80MB/s+) so not good enough for 1080p raw.

 

Alex thinks it is card controller limit not card on 600D. So it may be stuck at the lower resolutions. Let's wait and see.

letusa_play likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

In the ML forums they said it may be a hardware issue. No matter what SD card you put in you'll still get about 22mbs speed. We have to wait and see.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

Yes, the SD is definitely capable of faster write speeds than 22MB/s.

 

Not a card bottle neck, looks like controller one.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

Could you post the link or the file you use to install i would like to run some test on my T3i Thanks

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

I have done some research of 700D, 650D, 600D & 60D for their internal buffer size according to their continuous shooting maximum capacity. Here is the spec of each camera:

 

700D: 5fps, max 30 jpg, 6 RAW

650D: 5fps, max 30 jpg, 6 RAW

600D: 3.7fps, max 34 jpg, 6 RAW

60D: 5.3fps, max 58 jpg, 16 RAW

 

We may now find that 60D should have a much bigger buffer size from the capacity of 16 RAW. As a RAW is about 22MB for 18MP image, the buffer size might be about minimum 112MB(22MB X 5.3fps) to 352MB (22MB X 16fps). I have tested with my 60D and use S-RAW(4.5MP), then I can reach about maximum 30fps before it pauses.

 

Now we know the value of 60D and the X0D series later. That’s comprehensible because 60D used to be the first swirl monitor design on EOS series which aims on video shooting. Bigger buffer and writing speed is more guarantee for the reliability of video recording. 50D is also able to shoot 16 RAW@6.3fps rate.

 

My prediction is ML for 60D may able to record DNG like other higher class EOS. I may change my plan of selling my 60D. 

The next thing that may excite me should be EOS-M taking DNG movie, if it is possible, 5D series might still need to worry quite a lot.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

I must admit I didn't really know about this site before all this RAW news, but I have to say it's been a delight to read. I love Andrew's style of writing and the general atmosphere on the site, a perfect balance of technical knowledge and artistic skill.

 

Good work Andrew!

Andrew Reid and fluxo like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

I bought a 600D (T3i) earlier this year because I wanted an affordable first camera for learning to shoot indie movies, with the intention to move up to a 5D eventually.

 

I've shot a few short movies with it, and the results look very nice on a 80 inch screen.  I shoot at 1080p, 24fps. Would shooting raw at 720p and then upscaling to 1080p yield a better looking picture than what I currently do which is to shoot 1080p with the H.254 codec?

 

Another question I have for the experts here is, given the reported hardware limitations in terms of memory controller bandwidth of the 600D, if it is impossible to shot RAW at 1080p, could it be possible to replace the codec for a better one such as ProRes 4444 or CineForm 444?

 

In the meantime, I'm starting to save for a 5D Mark III :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

6D is reaching 40MB/s. Double 600D, but still half of what common 1000x CF cards achieve on the 5D Mark III (80MB/s+) so not good enough for 1080p raw.

 

Alex thinks it is card controller limit not card on 600D. So it may be stuck at the lower resolutions. Let's wait and see.

 

I don't want to have to replace my 7D with a 5DmkIII, but that might be the case!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

I have done some research of 700D, 650D, 600D & 60D for their internal buffer size according to their continuous shooting maximum capacity. Here is the spec of each camera:

 

700D: 5fps, max 30 jpg, 6 RAW

650D: 5fps, max 30 jpg, 6 RAW

600D: 3.7fps, max 34 jpg, 6 RAW

60D: 5.3fps, max 58 jpg, 16 RAW

 

 

That is why I wonder why 600D was taken as second camera to test, not 60D. I also have 60D and I wanted to sell it a week ago, and to buy Panasonic, but now I wait inpatient. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

+1, Superka!
i totally understand that now we are at the early stage of this raw hacking but i'm just wondering why 60D is kinda off topic with this thing...we know ML tried to reach the 1080P/35fps with 60D first, right?

anyway, I need to wait and hope we can get stable enough 1080P24fps raw with 60D near future! crossing my fingers!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

I bought a 600D (T3i) earlier this year because I wanted an affordable first camera for learning to shoot indie movies, with the intention to move up to a 5D eventually.

 

I've shot a few short movies with it, and the results look very nice on a 80 inch screen.  I shoot at 1080p, 24fps. Would shooting raw at 720p and then upscaling to 1080p yield a better looking picture than what I currently do which is to shoot 1080p with the H.254 codec?

 

Another question I have for the experts here is, given the reported hardware limitations in terms of memory controller bandwidth of the 600D, if it is impossible to shot RAW at 1080p, could it be possible to replace the codec for a better one such as ProRes 4444 or CineForm 444?

 

In the meantime, I'm starting to save for a 5D Mark III :)

 

Possibly, I believe the Canons don't actually resolve 1080 lines in h264 anyway so it probably will be better.

 

+

 

I highly doubt that, from my understanding they got RAW by simply managing to get a stills burst mode at a lower resolution. That is a far cry from implementing a different codec on the camera.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

That is why I wonder why 600D was taken as second camera to test, not 60D. I also have 60D and I wanted to sell it a week ago, and to buy Panasonic, but now I wait inpatient. 

Maybe because its slower than the 60D, that way if they can get it working on the 600D it will most definitely work on 60D because they also use same processor?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites