
userage
Members-
Content Count
27 -
Joined
-
Last visited
About userage

-
Rank
Member
-
Canon 1D C vs 5D Mark III Raw (and C300 / GH2 resolution comparison)
userage replied to Andrew Reid's topic in Cameras
Imagine RAW on the the GH2 ;) -
Huuow reacted to a post in a topic: Best zoom lens for weddings?
-
I don't think you should be shooting a wedding..
-
Sorry whats the question? Are you asking is the GH3 good for stills? In which case yes. Even the GH2 was. It depends on your needs though, but the GH3 looks like an awesome body.
-
Why would you want MJEG...
-
Maybe because its slower than the 60D, that way if they can get it working on the 600D it will most definitely work on 60D because they also use same processor?
-
Possibly, I believe the Canons don't actually resolve 1080 lines in h264 anyway so it probably will be better. + I highly doubt that, from my understanding they got RAW by simply managing to get a stills burst mode at a lower resolution. That is a far cry from implementing a different codec on the camera.
-
Metabones Speed Booster for Micro Four Thirds - First Look and GH3 images
userage replied to Andrew Reid's topic in Cameras
Wow I didn't even know about Lens Turbo.. At half the price who is going to get the Metabones? They should put an aperture adjustment lever for the MFT adapters though so we can use AF lenses. -
Metabones Speed Booster for Micro Four Thirds - First Look and GH3 images
userage replied to Andrew Reid's topic in Cameras
' The 50mm, 35mm and 90mm cost 300 euros altogether.' WHERE DID YOU GET THEM THAT CHEAP? D: -
I thought it was worth sharing, GH2 still resolving a bit more detail there but its more or less on par with the MK III RAW http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SFBc7i1Q_0w
-
Looking to buy a new camera, is there a chance this will come to the lower Canons? 550d/60d/7d ? Or shall I just go for a GH2/G6
-
Well I spoke too soon. http://nofilmschool.com/2013/05/1080p-raw-video-canon-5d-mark-iii-anamorphic/#more-53850 Now if only I could afford a 5D MK III.. Never realized just how far apart they have torn the firmware..
-
I think it could easily rival the C100/300, although ProRes would be better for most people. Plus I don't know if they can get 1920x1080 RAW, that might simply be too much for the buffer, I don't think everyone wants to shoot 2.35:1. Although the detail resolved is very good, they could do 1663x940 (which the buffer can handle) and simply scale it up to 1080 and I'm sure the detail would still be better than stock.
-
No significant improvement in Canon APS-C sensors since 2004
userage replied to Andrew Reid's topic in Cameras
No Pentax on that graph? They too wipe the floor with Canon :p