Jump to content

Superka

Members
  • Posts

    49
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Superka

  1. About the streaks on Panasonic GH6. My Sony a7c has the same. Fuji X-T3, 4 also does. Why Gerals never told about it on those cameras?
  2. For me the Photo-off-Video switch is the only really bad thing. When filming my kids I often want to take picture and that must be immidiatly. I don't care about IBIS
  3. Now I know Canon will continue developing DSLR, so no worries. They were talking about flagship DSLR only, which I don't care about.
  4. I think an open-letter video letter for Canon must be created, asking them not to do this. With DSLR I can frame shot with camera switched off (in sleep mode). This for me is great advantage, when taking landscape, cityscape shots. Mirrorless needs to be waked up each time. Andrew said Fuji are mirrorless, - yes, but Fuji have optical VF cameras!
  5. I absolutly AGREE with BMD about EOS Mount. Huge choise of Canon and others manufacture lenses .Lenses are good and for any budget! Those who wants to use Ef and ef-s lenses will be happy to use them without adapters. Still with EOS you can use NIKON, Russian lenses with adapters. ND filters construction on this cam may not be suitable for others flange distances - my guess. I thanks BMD for EF-mount!
  6. Hello! Our family footage with amazing music. If you see AD while playing video - copyrights holder monitizing video, not me.
  7. +1! I love shooting neighborhood with it. Though I bought it for video, it appeared to be really nice photocamera with lovely colors. The only thing I wish (from successor) is V-LOG.
  8. Does anybody still use LX100? I I still love it, though feel the lack of DR often.
  9. Hello Mattias! My genius tripod plate problem fix.
  10. Panasonic cannot compare to Sony, because of Panasonics poor autofocus.
  11. WOW! The Canon Utility converts to OpenEXR!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! YEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEESSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! I LOVE CANON!
  12. I don't see any real reason to look at GH5 at all, when there are SONY a6300/6500. Bigger sensor, less noise, S-LOGs included, autofocus, and much cheaper. just for 10bit 4:2:2 400Mbit/s? Not for me.
  13. canon has more DR and less noise, no metabones needed. I don't trust Paasonic skin tones at all. Canons 150mbit/s is perfectly good for me. Canon is so much better, that's really no contest.
  14. I've worked with film scans for some time, when creating CG for movies. I love film since that time, and shoot film (photos) mostly since 2008 year. Film is fantastic. The feature I love most - extremely large DR, unachiavable for digital, but what even more important the Characheristic curve of film expose is creating very soft highlights. I also love film images for its details, but without sharpening feeling. We call this plasticity, but I not sure it's the right English word. Film has no hard edges. But has lots of details. Well, I should mention film colors, of course. Film colors and its "plasticity" (plastique) creates very pleasant general feeling. O.K., Shane Hurlbu made the test. But that's a wrong test, he didn't manage the film right, and I am not agree with his conclusions. But I assume that lot of people will love digital picture more. But you should know "the point".
  15. Why don't you complain that SONY didn't make any improvements in still images in their FS7 camera? I think Canon did right when split their products to still and video lines. They did this right!
  16. About EOSHD opinion: I'm also 34 and I prefer Optical Viewfinder much more for photo. I don't understand why you always stress talk about EVF/LCD, it doesn't matter for video. DSLR can have good video too, as Nikon D810, only flip LCD is a must for video. Thank you for your interview, it was interesting! Did you see DPreview interview? http://***URL removed***/articles/7079726133/photokina-2014-canon-interview-mirrorless-in-the-very-near-future DPreview: One thing we know from our own testing is that Canon DSLR sensors can’t quite compete with some modern sensors from Sony in terms of dynamic range. How important to you is developing sensor technology? Canon: We are very focused on getting the best image quality. I’m not sure what measurements you’re looking at but when it comes to dynamic range for example we consider image quality as a whole, from low to high ISO sensitivities and on balance we consider our sensors to be the best. My ideal camera is one that can take a picture in any environment from complete darkness to the brightest sunshine. It looks like Canon is satisfied with their product completely!
  17. The camera of this type can influence the framing. More wide-angle composition would be used in any kind of movie: drama, action, nature documentary. And that's good!
  18. You should have add Autofocus feature, which may be good on 7Dm2. Autofocus does matter. PL lens compatible – No - did you expect it to be????? LOG curve mode – No - I think that can be possible with picture profiling.
  19. About mirrorless. I don't care why Canon and Nikon didn't produce good mirrorless. I don't need mirrorless (if only it would be a rangefinder), because I love OVF really. I would be happy if Canon will produce DSLR with OVF as the old film camera had - 0.98x field of view, 0.92x - magnification, like my small-tiny Olympus OM-10 has. Why not produce them again? You may ask them, too! :)
  20. That's better. I like that you now use smaller amount of the words like "outperform", "outdated". Too many comparisons still, inconsistent many of them, like A7s and 1Dx, c300 and FS7 (too many years between), 36Mp (do you need this for video?),12Mp ... lump everything together: old and new, different camera types (DSLR/mirrorless), different Megapixels (its clear that 12Mpx sensor will be more sensitive then those in Canon) . Who really cares that you use Sony A7s for everything? Looks like you want Canon to be Sony. It is clear that Canon produce sensors they can produce. Canon has nothing to do but to invent new technology (or buy it) to produce better sensors, or to use Sony sensors, too. What to expect - that's the question to ask. I really like the suggestion just to ask about their plans for video in DSLR/mirroroles, having mention their common drawbacks like line skipping and lack of Dynamic range - that what we all expect for better video. Besides, I would ask them why don't they produce true rangefinder camera like they did before. Why they all produce 3:2 aspect sensors, not 1:2,3, or square. Nikon produce film cameras (F6) but stopped the production of their fantastic film scanners, while people need them. Those who shoot film, as I do, would be interested. Why they don't produce BW sensors or sensors with another (more soft) colors, like Kodak did. That's true, I saw this many time in their interview.
×
×
  • Create New...