Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
Andrew Reid

Shooting 4K for 2K on the Panasonic GH4 plus pre-review short film

Recommended Posts



My full review of the Panasonic GH4 (final retail unit) is coming next week. Until then I am enjoying Philip Bloom's views on the camera here!

A big thanks to B&H Photo & Video in the US for shipping internationally a GH4 unit with no recording limits, I got it before it was even available in Europe. Delivery took just 2 days! Impressed!

Read the full article here

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
EOSHD Pro Color for Sony cameras EOSHD Pro LOG for Sony CamerasEOSHD C-LOG and Film Profiles for All Canon DSLRs
Guest Ebrahim Saadawi

Is it soft like the 1080p out of the Canons with the inbuilt codec, or worse?

Actually sharper. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Really like your new short 'The Machine,' Very nice experimental feel to it, which you're not new to utilizing. The editing and style is more important than the quality of the GH4 here, which is refreshing with all the recent GH4 tests. That being said, you do have some very good quality "cinematic" shots in there. I'm interested to see your tests with your new EF focal reducer purchase as well as more anamorphic tests. Ryan Glover did a nice test with Lomo glass that I haven't seen posted here:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The short looks lovely.

 

I have a question about something I seem to be seeing in almost all the GH4 footage, but I can't tell if it is a grading choice or what. The greens (particularly foliage greens) seem kind of garish and lacking in dynamic range - there is one green, and it is really bright. Is that an artifact of recovering the skin tones, or actually just part of the color response of the camera?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The 4K Ex-Tele thing in post is very useful as it's fully zoomable in post of course. For people wondering, the in-camera version of the Ex-tele mode works in the HD modes so if you turn it on then it acts as an extra reminder should you accidentally switch from 4k to HD. Hmmm if it starts to do 1:1 in 1080 ex-tele I wonder if that might appear better quality than the averaging thing it does normally...?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Do you still have the benefits of shooting 4K if you transcode to 2K before editing ?
I'm referring to lack of moire and aliasing, detail/resolution, ...

I'm asking because I'm considering the following workflow :

shoot in 4K > convert to 2K > edit and grade > export to 2K

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Andrew,

Some questions which could be helpful please:

1. Will it make a difference if you use GH4 with Metabones Nikon G to BMCC or the Normal Metabones Nikon G to M4/3? 
2. Whats the difference you get if you use full frame Nikon Lenses?
3. Can Nikon Lenses with Electronic Aperture be used (like the Nikon 70-200 f2.8 VR) and work with the GH4 + Meta bones adapter? would they work?

 

Sorry for all the questions but I want to to the maths well before committing to new hardware :)
Thanks
 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Do you still have the benefits of shooting 4K if you transcode to 2K before editing ?
I'm referring to lack of moire and aliasing, detail/resolution, ...

I'm asking because I'm considering the following workflow :

shoot in 4K > convert to 2K > edit and grade > export to 2K

Yeah, I'm wondering the same thing. I'm considering the same workflow hoping to keep more colour info in the file (less banding) than if I shot 1080p. Wonder if there is a user friendly transcoding App that converts 4K 4.2.0 material shot in camera to full 1080p 4.2.2 or 4.4.4 ready for editing?

Hope someone has an answer to this!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Really like your new short 'The Machine,' Very nice experimental feel to it, which you're not new to utilizing. The editing and style is more important than the quality of the GH4 here, which is refreshing with all the recent GH4 tests. That being said, you do have some very good quality "cinematic" shots in there. I'm interested to see your tests with your new EF focal reducer purchase as well as more anamorphic tests. Ryan Glover did a nice test with Lomo glass that I haven't seen posted here:

>

 

edit: Also what is this you mention about better raw look out of a 5d mk ii vs mk iii ? Going to have to try this out for myself...

 

The Mk II raw with anti-aliasing filter installed is very interesting. It doesn't quite have the ultra-clean feel of the 5D3 so feels more analogue. I am working on an updated Shooter's Guide for both the 5D3 and 5D2, plus have shot a ton of stuff which isn't yet published! There will be many more articles in the coming weeks on this and quite a few surprises :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah, I'm wondering the same thing. I'm considering the same workflow hoping to keep more colour info in the file (less banding) than if I shot 1080p. Wonder if there is a user friendly transcoding App that converts 4K 4.2.0 material shot in camera to full 1080p 4.2.2 or 4.4.4 ready for editing?

Hope someone has an answer to this!

 

Try this app -

 

http://www.eoshd.com/content/12594/exclusive-first-app-resample-panasonic-gh4-4k-8bit-10bit-444

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the very useful information Andrew, I just bought the Chinese focal reducer, can't wait to try it out with my Dog Schidt optics EF mount 55mm.  I bought via a Hong Kong seller, in my experience they are faster to ship.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Many thanks Andrew..... however - as embarrassing as this is to write in a virtual room full of amazing computer minds - I have to say that I have no idea how to run this application. I read the explanation and have to say it's about as easy to navigate as German grammar. Please give me drag n'drop and I'm happy.

 

I must admit I tried this App once before - hence my wording - "user friendly transcoding app"

However, much appreciated!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Andrew could you comment on the generic adaptor vs the Mitakon that is also available? How is the IQ? I can't seem to see the crop factor info on the generic one. Much appreciated.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Nice shorty and cute girl!
How is it with using copyrighted music like you did? I made a short years ago which I never dared to put on vimeo because I used some music of Messian ( french "compositeur classique")?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I've been confused with the crops factors on the camera cause it seems lots of people seem to be bouncing back and forth between FF or Super 35mm when talking about cropping. Does shooting in C4K/UHD change the cropping to S35? What does it end up being with and without a Speedbooster, in Super 35mm?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Screenshot-2014-05-12-23.58.58.jpg

 

Super35mm crop factor to full frame is usually around 1.5x

 

With standard Micro4/3 Speed Booster, C4K mode becomes 1.63x crop (.71 x 2.3 )

   BMCC Speed Booster makes it 1.47x crop (.64 x 2.3 )

 

In 1080p/stills mode, with the standard Micro4/3 booster - 1.42x crop

  and BMCC booster - 1.28x

 

edit: Sorry, misunderstood your question with regard to what crop factor is to Super35mm standard. Andrew just answered it though

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I've been confused with the crops factors on the camera cause it seems lots of people seem to be bouncing back and forth between FF or Super 35mm when talking about cropping. Does shooting in C4K/UHD change the cropping to S35? What does it end up being with and without a Speedbooster, in Super 35mm?

 

It ends up being a 0.9x crop with BMCC Speed Booster if you compare it to the typical Super 35mm sensor size. I.e. it goes larger than Super 35mm, but still a 1.4x crop over photographic full frame.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm of two minds about this, as least as it pertains to the review of the GH4. On the one hand, it's a beautiful piece, and really showcases the potential of the camera. On the other, you contrast it with some of the garbage being shot on the GH4 (

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Sign in to follow this  

×
×
  • Create New...