Al Dolega

GxAce's stuff is so good. One of the few YTers I will purposefully wait to watch on my desktop or TV.

I feel similar mostly. If the new team can successfully and stably move it to the new Canons that is one thing but nowadays, with ML at its current level of capability/compatibility I see it as great for those who are way short on funds but way long on free time, or are just tinkerers in general, but anyone whose priority is actual shooting instead of fiddling/tinkering is much better off just grabbing a used GH5, S5, S1 etc for well under $1K and getting to it.

Doesn't really work the same as an actual EVF, a loupe on a flip-out screen isn't solid enough to press the camera into your face for stability. Kinda works on a tilt screen. On a fixed screen or a flipscreen left flat against the body it's fine, and this is ok for cameras without a traditional EVF, but you don't get the tilt benefit.

Looks like E, X, L, RF. I would assume Z too?

https://www.canonrumors.com/canon-aps-c-shooters-rejoice-sigma-to-launch-the-rf-17-40mm-f-1-8-and-rf-12mm-f-1-4/ Remember those like 5 years where everyone had the 18-35mm f1.8? Seems like this would be the successor. Full frame is of course dominant now, so this wouldn't be as omnipresent as the 18-35, but could still be a very popular choice, at least if it comes to other mounts too.

Very promising, assuming that the power issue has more to do with the FP than the EVF itself. A bit disappointing about the crushed blacks though. I wonder if that could be tweaked in the firmware, maybe it's a 16-235 vs 0-255 issue.

Love the tilting EVF, everything else is pretty meh. The EVF is something the FX3/30 should have had from the beginning, not just ergonomically but simply as a value calculation- the FX3 always seemed priced way too high against the A7Siii considering it lost the EVF. It gained a fan, sure, but I don't think a fan out-costs an EVF by $500. And I bet they've sold nearly as many FX3s as A7Siiis, more probably if you include the FX30. So the high cost wasn't an economy-of-scale thing. Just Sony being greedy. Now the FX2 has the EVF again, so $2700 seems much more appropriate vs. the A7iv, considering the tariff thing. I hope they keep the EVF on this body style moving forward. Chin down, eye in EVF, right hand on grip, left hand cradling lens/bottom of body, elbows in against the torso is just such an efficient, stable shooting position. Basically the small-camera equivalent of shoulder-mounting a big camera. C100/200, FS5 are perfect examples of this. This body with a better sensor would be a big hit, hopefully that's what the FX3 replacement is.

*olive green

Maybe the Arri/Panasonic relationship is more than just the LogC thing, maybe they're sharing costs/tech at OnSemi.

I try to limit my social-media/vertical-video viewing, but even so I do end up still seeing a fair amount of slo-mo being used, especially obnoxious ramped slo-mo. So I can definitely see there being demand. I don't doubt you're not seeing it, though- the algorithm gives us all different things. There's also anamorphic shooters and those who just want to shoot in a square-er format, too. And even those never touching slo-mo benefit from the demand for slo-mo as it generally brings down the rolling shutter in regular-speed modes, too. Yup, bought my S1 a little less than two years after launch, with the 24-105 and V-Log upgrade, in minty condition for $2200. Kinda hoping that S1H prices drop under $1K sometime soon, not sure if the tariff stuff will delay that though.

Could just be a simple capacity thing, maybe Towerjazz or other non-Sony suppliers just can't pump out as many finished sensors? Maybe their yield rate from each wafer is lower than Sony's, so it makes more sense to do smaller formats as you lose less from each wafer when there's defects? Who knows. Maybe BlackMagic using FPGA processors instead of ASICs, which I believe is cheaper, is part of their low pricing? Also why their cameras are so power-hungry compared to a mirrorless or Sony Canon etc cinema cams processing similar amounts of info (actually, way less processing for BM cams, as they're not compressing down to h264/265 etc). Anyway, my prediction with pricing is that we're going to see prices rise across the board from here forward due to the tariff issues. Pannyboi just had the bad luck to be the first to launch a post-tariff camera so right now they look bad/dumb/greedy, I bet in a year everyone else will have caught right up.

And for the GH6/G9ii/GH7 sensor too, I believe.

There are dozens of us!

It's relevant to the pricing strategy Panasonic is using, which is what Andrew and others are critiquing and I was responding to. Of course from an end-user POV you would want to compare against relevant used or discounted-new offerings. I waited almost two years for the first S1 to depreciate enough that I could afford it- got a minty one with the 24-105 for $2200.

While I agree with most of the criticisms of Panasonic's marketing, as far as pricing goes I feel they may be getting treated a bit harshly. The S1 launched at $2500 in 2019; with inflation that's about $3150 in today's money. So not really much of a price increase, although of course overall wages have not kept up with inflation, rates on video jobs are always being squeezed, etc. Then there's the US tariff fiasco to take into account, that has to be affecting the pricing somewhat. I bet in a year's time when the counterpart models from the other brands are out that their pricing will be similar because they're dealing with the same fees and uncertainty. Not entirely fair to compare the pricing of one of the first cameras to come out post-tariff-ridiculousness with that of models from before. The S1ii is in at least one way very similar to its predecessor, which was also using a newish Sony sensor that had debuted the year before (IMX410 in the A7iii), but did an arguably better job with it than Sony did.