Jump to content

Anaconda_

Members
  • Posts

    1,507
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Anaconda_

  1. BM should look into making the HDMI an input too, so you can put one on top of the other to film those selfie shots people are so worried about.

    It would also double as a ProRes recorder for any other camera, putting Atomos out of business as well haha!

  2. 1 minute ago, Andrew Reid said:

    However the E2 doesn't shoot internal raw or ProRes, only H.264 if I'm not mistaken. So less interested in that one.

    I thought it was h264 or h265 depending on your settings at the time of recording. Still... not raw or ProRes.

  3. 2 minutes ago, sanveer said:

    Not that this will win some beauty awards, but it is nowhere as ugly as the initial renders. If you watch the pics on the Blackmagic site, it actually looks pretty nice.

    Must be the make-up and lighting. :grin:

    Blackmagic's website hosts the most airbrushed, processed set of images I've ever seen. I always chuckle when I go on there... Which is sure to be a lot more often between now and September.

  4. 1 minute ago, BTM_Pix said:

    You can pay in Euros at CVP by the way

    Yeah but with 20% tax - in NL we're at 21% so it messes with my reports and could open up some holes which I simply can't be bothered to deal with. I'd rather just wait a day or two for a store here to open preorders if need be.

  5. 14 minutes ago, Juxx989 said:

    It really (from the front) looks like that grip and buttons section could come off.

    And that top piece with the thread in it looks like a seperate piece like it could be unscrewed...

    I don't think any part of it is detachable aside from the lens. I assume that's just lines in design. The battery and storage more than likely goes inside the grip, so what's the use in taking it off?

     

  6. I never said it was the best thing to show up to a shoot with, only that it can work. 

    I know it's cheap, it looks cheap and feels cheap, but in my experience it does the job. I'd rather use it than not. I'm still unclear why a BMPC won't work on it. It's seems like you guys simply wouldnt want to use, which is fine, but then say so and don't present it as facts. 

     

  7. Alright, I obviously read it all wrong, my bad.

    2 hours ago, jonpais said:

    If you think saying the BMPC won't work with a $25 Cowboy plastic shoulder rig is hostility and not simply a statement of fact, sorry for that.

    I still don't think that's a statement of fact though. Can you explain why it wouldn't work? as I said before, I used that exact plastic rig with an FS5 yesterday, all day and it worked perfectly, so I'm struggling to see why a smaller, lighter camera won't work. 

  8. I have, both filming the exact same thing.

    As per B&H, the BM is larger, but it's far from comparing a GH5 to an FS5. 

    BMPC - 6.53 x 4.45 x 4.96" - 3.75 lb

    GH5 -   5.5 x 3.9 x 3.4" - 1.59 lb

    Maybe I'm reading it wrong, but there is a lot of hostility around something I thought could be an interesting comparison. I am reading and understanding comments, and trying to argue points that might have been overlooked like the fact that you have to have external audio on the BM... You also do on the GH if you want to use it.

    Thanks again everyone for contributing.

  9. Ah cool, reading the rest of the comments since my last has given me more information. Like I say, I have no interest in buying either camera, but at my first glance they seemed like they're for similar markets... As made abundantly clear now, they are not. That's why we ask questions huh?  

     

    @IronFilm I've seen at least 3 go kitted out for €900 here, which is what got me thinking.

    @cantsin I still don't get that. It works fine with an FS5 so why not the BMPC? I didn't realise about the battery, it didn't even cross my mind to look if you could take the battery out... What a crazy design.

    That said, hanging on to my ignorance, knowing I have never used either camera, I still find it hard to believe there's much in it once you learn the limitations of each camera. Since they're more or less the same size though, isn't it more like replacing a classic sports car with a Tesla? They're both great, but one runs on batteries and self drives (Gh5 with ibs) and the other is discontinued and needs a bit of tinkering after a days drive (BMPC with raw). 

    Thanks all, I feel enlightened and  comfortable with the camera I'd chose at the end of the day.

    2 hours ago, IronFilm said:

     

  10. Thanks Jon, but could I ask you to expand a little more?

    A run 'n gun camera can be whatever camera is nearest. Imagine not getting the shot because you were holding a BMPC instead of the GH5 that in your bag. Like I said, for events, sure BMPC isn't the best, but for more or less everything else, it seems to come out on top.

    I also can't see why a monopod or that rig won't work. In fact, I had an FS5 on that one just yesterday and it was perfect for the moment. While filming, the weight of the camera was still in my hands, but I could brace it against my body for stabilisation. Then when I'm not actively filming, my shoulder took the weight and my hand was just to stop it falling. Why would it be any different for any other camera?

    6 minutes ago, anonim said:

    I'd say - it is very hard goal to achieve :)

    Yes, perhaps you're right.

    Like any camera comparison, though, there's no clear answer. I feel like I'm being biased, and don't mean to be, I don't own either camera and don't plan on buying one or the other, it's purely hypothetical interest. In fact, I use a GX80 as an easy to grab b-cam, so if anything should favour the GH5 which shares many great features and adds a whole load more.

×
×
  • Create New...