Jump to content

Dunjoye

Members
  • Posts

    132
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Dunjoye

  1. 12 minutes ago, Django said:

    @Dunjoye not sure what you mean, I find the IQ super clean. Much less noise than on any previous gen Canon tbh. Obviously high-ISO introduces noise, but I find the noise on R6 to be very fine grain and quite filmic compared to the horrible banding present on older sensor models. You can also turn NR off which is good.

     

    Re: AF Lens noise

    I don't have much experience with RF lenses but they do seem louder than their L counterparts. I've noticed quite few RF have open barrel front moving elements so that could be part of it. Fast F1.2 and hybrid macro lenses like the RF35 are going to struggle to be silent as well.

    Optically, the RF lenses are quite amazing though. I've got my eyes on the RF 15-35mm 2.8L IS. I don't do much telephoto stuff and like to shoot close to my subjects.

    Maybe, it's just the videos have seen shot with it on Youtube. My EOS-R is clean to be fair, but from an Ex 1DC user, I always used this as a bench mark . 

  2. BMPCC 6K PRO @£1879 is very decent. 

    I have the pocket 4k, I was not interested in the 6K as an upgrade, but this 6Kpro addresss alot of issues (Screen Battery & Filters) and makes it a better run & gun alternative.  I think I might upgrade 

  3. 9 hours ago, Andrew Reid said:

    Micro HDMI input will make it a nice lightweight, if flimsy monitor. Battery life should be decent too.

    But the price is ludicrous.

    Good news is it's a phone and should depreciate rapidly, it would e worth half the cost this time next year. 

  4. 36 minutes ago, SteveV4D said:

    What is the real dedicated thing?  And for what job?  Panasonic don't feel constrained by the fact their cameras are mirrorless hybrids to add extra functionality.  Especially as it brings in more cash for them.  A lot of us do use mirrorless cameras for video work as we like a camera that can be kept small when needed and then rigged up for jobs that demand it.  A larger cinema camera doesn't have that flexibility.  

    Besides larger cinema cameras have their own attachments that add to the cost.  I remember looking at an URSA, that had a basic price, then a higher price if you included all the extra attachments to make the thing more usable.  So its not confined to Mirrorless.

     

    The real thing I meant an actual video camera. Yes, I know all cameras have theirs short comings, on hybrids even more. It's all subjective I suppose. I believe every hybrid camera within the last 5 years is very capable of doing majoirty of the job. There as been significant improvment within the last year with regards to image quality and practical UX.  It's time to jsut get out there and shoot. 

  5. All of these attachments and extras. Why not just get the real dedicated thing?

    Sometimes you have to respect some cameras short comings and figure out work arounds.

    Yes, its usually all subjective, but the term "Usable" gets thrown around here alot and I just see it as an excuse for people to get out there and shoot.

  6. 1 hour ago, SteveV4D said:

    The funny side of all this is to take a peak at the DpReview forum of Canon users supporting the R5.  The same users who not so long ago were saying we don't need 4K when Canon were giving us badly cropped 4K are now saying how great 8K is.  The same users who attacked Sony for chasing specs and delivering unreliable cameras that shut down due to overheating are trying to justify the overheating of the R5 and saying it doesnt matter.  Hypocrisy, thigh name are Canon users.  🤣🤣🤣

    What's even funnier, were people that were saying the heating issue was a lazy excuse for Canon not implementing raw & higher bit rate on their DSLR  years back are now the same people complaining about over heating on the R5 & R6. 

     

    I guess there is no pleasing some. 

  7. 6 hours ago, leslie said:

    should be a stock item from blackmagic design. I imagine it would be cheaper to buy from a retailer rather than someone who's listed one on ebay, best to check around for pricing. 

    Yeeea. its like £239 retail

  8. On 6/8/2020 at 11:55 PM, Andrew Reid said:

    DSCF0159.jpg

    DSCF0160.jpg

    Feels a bit more like it.

    But the battery compartment wobbles.

     

    Looks nice. 

    I was bidding on one of these via ebay to a UK seller brofre missing out. £138.   How long is the battery life on it now withthe grip. Is it worth it?

  9. 2 hours ago, Avenger 2.0 said:

    Would love that. However I'm not sure at the moment for video the R and RP are even worth it. 4k is great it you can live with the crop. 1080p is still soft as it was 10 years ago unless you also shoot 1080p in crop mode.

    1080p ALl-i is much better than the 5dmkii/iii It's not raw, but it's very usable.

  10. Hmm, Those specs are wild. I will be surprised if canon jump to 8k on a mirrorless at this time in their lifecycle. 

    4K-120 will be welcomed. The codec must be biscuit to run both 8K & 4K120fps imo. 

    Well I believe it when I see it. 

  11. 6 hours ago, ade towell said:

    The terrible RS is very disappointing, it made the Eos-r useless for my needs and was hoping the 1DX3 tech might make it's way to an Rf mirrorless. Not interested anymore

    Dont really see the issue with Rollin shutter tbh.  Easy work arounds. The 1dc had bad rolling shutter but was still used in high end producition 

×
×
  • Create New...