Dunjoye

From what I have seen so far, there isn't anything significantly new in terms of motion cadence and  Color science on the Gh5 that has the wow factor 

The C-log would be a welcomed improvement to the 5d mark iv imo. But it's not a deal breaker 

No disrespect to these user made log profiles. They are great but they just don't have the same kick as the C-log.

An improvement on the crop however would be a big bonus.

I think the log would be more appreciateon on the 1dx mark ii .

The 1dc with a dpaf improvement would be my deal choice, however I believe they are done with the camera. 

10 hours ago, Asmundma said:

Is the 5d4 really so bad in low ligtht? Its a new senor. Not sure 5d4 is worse then 1dc for stills? 30M vs 18M, probably better autofucus on 5d4. Build quality better on 1dc, but 5d4 should be good enough for most people.

Pixels isn't everything. If I was doing stills only, It wouldn't even be a deciding factor for me. plus I think the 1dc as a faster burst rate. The autofocus, Wifi monitoring is a big plus. 

Does anyone know if the 1dc outputs 1080 60fps via hdmi?

Thanks  guys, Yeah, I have decided to settle for the the 1DC. I will probably do same as treb999 and upgrade to the 1DXii later down the line. 

Thanks Andrew. I have been following this forum for years but never posted. Some great reviews over the years.

I am probably the only person that welcomes this addition on the the Canon Eos range.

Which leads me to the question.  Which is better to go for for 4k video  1DC VS 5D MARK IV.

Log is not a massive deal breaker for me but its a great addition. I do like the 1Dx mark ii Profile colors (out of my budget)which is identical to the 5DMK4 at 4k MJPEG. The 5DMK4 does shoot at 30fps 4K.

Which one is better to go for?

5DMK4 ; £2700

1DC:  £2500-3500 - depending on shutter count & condition 

Another question does the 1dc record 60fps 1080 out?

Apologies if this topic has been done before.