Jump to content

Yannick Willox

Members
  • Posts

    178
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Yannick Willox

  1. 19 minutes ago, Video Hummus said:

    Hey guys, I was at a garage sale the other day and some old lady was selling her deceased husbands lenses. I took a quick peek and found a motherload of vintage Leica, Zeiss, Minolta and a bunch of cheaper Russian lenses. Bought all of them for $300.

    Just ship me your camera and I’ll attach the lens for free and ship it back! Just want to spread vintage lens love around since there are so many. ?

    Ok, i’ll send two camera’s !

    Can you advance the shipping costs ?

    Or this

     

  2. Yeah I had high hopes for my Ipad pro. But it is still clumsy to get in and out, your T5 trouble is just not worth it.

    Moreover, Apple's own Prores on Ipad seems centuries off, so now that I finally have my P4k, the Ipad pro is completely useless.

    Luckily there are some nice games on it.

    And facebook, if you are still into that.

    The Ipad pro : a social doorstop or gaming presse papier. Can someone remind me what's pro about it ? Ah yes, it has the speed, we just need to find a way to use it.

  3. 18 minutes ago, Emanuel said:

     

    The designer of this power bank clearly knows something about batteries. He has a complete list of parts, and could be willing to share/license this for almost nothing.

    personally i cannot do this kind of DIY, but maybe some users on this forum have the skills ?

    @BTM_Pix

    ?

    imo this powerbank should power the p4k for at least 2,5 h, plus a perfect handover to the internal battery for an extra 45 min. The cost should be less than 120 euro, even when commercialised.

  4. Posted this at blackmagic as well :

    I have stumbled upon this:

    https://muxtronics.nl/powerbank.html

    if only I could contact the person. Maybe if he receives 50-100 demands, he would take it in production. This powerbank seems like the ideal companion to the p4K : constant voltage, programmable (!), variants with more 18650 cells are possible. The standard form factor is really small, and fits the smallrig powerbank holder perfectly.

    I want to order one, have tried contacting, no response yet. I did not find a direct email ...

  5. 2 hours ago, BTM_Pix said:

    The Android version shouldn't be an issue as it should be compatible with 2.1 onwards.

    1. If you can answer a couple of questions then I'll be able to try and get to the bottom of it.
    2. What type of phone is it, specifically screen size ?
    3. Are you using it in Portrait or Landscape ?
    4. Which parts of the UI aren't scaling and can you post a screenshot ?
    5. Have you moved from v1.4 to v1.5 or from a previous version?
    6. Which combination of focus and zoom do you have enabled in the UI (if any) ?
    7. Are you using it with the Nucleus Nano?
    8. Does it become unresponsive when controlling a specific function from the app (i.e. changing aperture) or when it is receiving something from the camera (i.e. you've changed the aperture on the camera) ?
    9. Are you using an EF adapter when this happens and if so which one/lens ?
    10. Are you running anything else on BLE on the phone (headset etc) ?

    1. Yes I can

    2. Motorola E4 plus, 720x1280 pixels

    3. portrait cuts off the right part of the screen, about 15%

    4. nothing is scaling ? screenshot is difficult at the time. I removed the app, cleared some data, reinstalled. Now it behaves the same in portrait, but landscape is better ! The width fits, and now I can scroll vertically (this morning - not !).

    5. auto update is on, so probably from 1.4

    6. only focus

    7. no

    8.seems better now, big focus sweeps take a long time, and the app needs some time to be able to focus again.

    9. native lens (panaleica 12-60mm)

    10. no

    I noticed also, in previous versions as well, if I store a focal point and a second one, transition (eg 3 sec) is quite smooth if they are not too far from each other. If I do a transition from a really close focus to eg. infinity, it jumps in quite big steps (about 2,5 steps per second). Smoothing does not change anything. (same lens)

  6. I posted before, the pl 12-60 is passable at 12mm if there are no important vertical lines in the frame. My old 14-50 4/3 lens is better at 14mm than the new 12-60 at 14 mm. Even my  4/3 14-150 mm is better at 14 mm. Glad I kept my old glass. i am planning to get aMeike12mm for those wide shots.

    however, the 12-60 is parfocal, and the old lenses certainly not ...

  7. 2 hours ago, drm said:

    I have both of these lenses (along with many more). What are you looking for? Are you looking to see a comparison of the lens between the GH5 & P4K to see how much correction is being implemented in the GH5/GH5s?

    No, i just wanted to point out that, although I like the m4/3 system, using native lenses on p4k can have some big disadvantages. I have those lenses and a gx80, so I know the differences.

    So, what happens with the new and very expensive 10-25 mm ? It could be borderline unusable on the P4K ?

  8. On 9/28/2019 at 8:42 PM, Video Hummus said:

    I agree. It appears they are incorporating a few features in all the new S lenses. Manual focus clutch with a linear focus choice and parfocal abilities by using the AF system to “fake” an optically parfocal lens.

    I need to correct this. The new lenses ARE parfocal. The 12-60 on the P4K is still parfocal, without continuous AF.

  9. Just for information, some quick tests. The L-ES014050 is the old 4/3 PanaLeica kit lens for the Lumix L1. The other lens is the new PanaLeica 12-60 mm. To compare it was around 15mm, not exactly the same field of view, but difficult to judge, as the distortion is already way higher. At 12mm it goes crazy, still useable for wide shots if you don't have anything straight near the edges.

    Now I have read that the Oly 12-100 has even more severe distortion then the PanaLeica 12-60 ?

    Does anyone know how we can use something like a lens profile in Adobe Raw (Adobe Raw does not have them for Panasonic lenses, as they are corrected in-camera) ?

    H-ES12060_12mm.mxf H-ES12060_12mm_bis.mxf H-ES12060_15mm.mxf L-ES014050_14mm.mxf

  10. I am always wondering of the oly 12-100 does not have way too much distortion on the (uncorrected) P4k.

    my panaleica 12-60 is just OK at 12mm. My old 14-50 4/3 panaleica is already better at the wide end (as is my 14-150 mm). Glad I did not sell them !

    AF does not work on the 14-50 by the way.

  11. I just built a pc with Ryzen 3600 (not even X), and it plays those files easily. It overclocks to 4.1 GHz easy, which even gives 15% more headroom. But that is not necessary. I got a nvidea rtx2060 super 8gb graphics card, which can play 4k files with color grade without a sweat. Doing full res 4K playback with noise reduction on the fly gets on the limit with BRAW files, then you need a considerably faster gaphics card. But outputting to 2K is no problem at all, no proxies needed. I am still on a 2k monitor anyway.

    32gb ram, m2 ssd drive for video files. However, compressed files and braw files edit fine from my external T5 drive.

    i did the braw speed test, and this system can play 8k braw files without problem, up to 25 frames/s

    i was in doubt about geting a 3700x, which costs nearly double over here, but decided to get the ryzen 3600. Makes the decision to pop in a 16 core/32 thread in a year or two much easier.

  12. On 8/29/2019 at 5:09 PM, drm said:

    Hi Yannick,

    I do this all the time with my F8n, on multiple P4Ks & P6K. Just plug your BNC cable into the BNC out on the Zoom F8(n) and plug in to the P4K mic input. You will instantly see your timecode sync. Let me know if you have trouble and I can walk you through the steps.

    IMG_5194.jpg

    I finally got the cable and the P4K syncs perfectly now ! When I play a file on the F8, the timecode changes immediately to the TC in the audio file.

    That will save a couple of hours in post-production !

  13. 9 hours ago, scotchtape said:

    If you had read the thread you would have seen Sage mention that he prefers the NTG3 for indoors over the hyper cardiods, and then a bunch of other shotguns got mentioned.

    I did read the thread, but I did not know that the NTG3 is also an RF design. Good for Rode !

    If the off-axis response is indeed as well-behaved (lobing) as the spec sheet (with an idealised polar plot, which I do not like to see, it suggests they are hiding something) suggests, it should work very well indoors, as noted above.

×
×
  • Create New...