Jump to content

Stathman

Members
  • Posts

    117
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Stathman

  1. Do you have the pro version of the adapter or the standard?
  2. Stathman

    Fuji X-T4

    Besides the stepping issue, it's very good. I have a 135mm manual lens that I couldn't even focus properly for a still shot on the X-T3, but it's a joy to use on the X-H1 because of IBIS. X-T4 will be more popular than X-H1 so I am sure they will try harder to solve these issues.
  3. Stathman

    Fuji X-T4

    Which lenses did you use on X-H1? I can reproduce the issue using the 50mm F2.0 (X-H1 Body Firmware v2.01)
  4. Wow. They really got serious. Now I can see a reason for the past crappy releases. It seems that they skipped a generation.
  5. This is what you where talking about! https://www.fujirumors.com/viltrox-33mm-f-1-4-pre-sale-started-and-shipping-april-21/ Those lenses would be a great option combined with an X-H1. I think X-H1 is very underestimated. It has great ergonomics and overall is a keeper. Combined with the price you can find one these days, it's a bargain. Cheers!
  6. I hope it's the same source that told you about 6K 60p and anamorphic modes on X-T4!
  7. Stathman

    Fuji X-T4

    I was expecting X-H1 body-like also but it seems we have to wait some more for the X-H2. Good news is that X-T3 gets what was missing. IBIS first of all and better battery. I don't prefer flippy screens over tilt ones but this is subjective..
  8. Stathman

    Fuji X-T4

    I believe that everyone who used X-T3 and X-H1, all wished for a camera with X-T3's guts in an X-H1 body. It seems that this is exactly what we get, plus some extras. Keep the price at 1500$ and I couldn't be any happier.
  9. According to this list you will gain ~4.5ms of less rolling shutter if shooting 60p. ?
  10. Stathman

    Davinci Resolve 16

    @thephoenix, @KnightsFan Mac or Windows?
  11. Congrats and good luck to all participants!!!
  12. You should buy one or two more frying pans, you never know.. I can see a middle step before it focuses on target or my eyes are flipping? Anyway, congrats!!! ???
  13. Stathman

    Davinci Resolve 16

    @heart0less How do you export stills? Right click on monitor, grab still, go to gallery tab right click export? Never had an issue with this procedure. I don't use proxies though...
  14. No, I didn't notice any difference.
  15. I did! I would like them to add white balance and focal length info if possible. On this clip WB was set to auto but if it is set to Kelvin it shows just "K" and not the actual value. I sent them a request.
  16. Here you go! https://www.sendspace.com/file/kh0lgf
  17. Yes, of course you can use rcm. I was just following the previews posts and my point was about the correct way to apply the lut. You can use REC.2100 HLG as an input in rcm.
  18. Correct me if I'm wrong, i think the correct way to do it is to use the preferred "HLG to xxx Lut" as a 3d output lut so any further corrections happening before the lut is applied to the image.
  19. https://www.sendspace.com/file/iemw3r You can create it yourself though, its not that difficult. LUTCalc is a nice tool.
×
×
  • Create New...