stefanocps

hello i am looking for a wireless mic to use with my fuji xt3. Don't want to pay lots of money like sennheiser or similar. I have seen the rode wireless go that seems good, and also i have seen the syncoo that is cheaper and even seems better according to some opinions. Would like to have suggestion on what to buy, is synco is really that good or other alternatives p.s. i have a rode videomic and a tascam dr40 which i use for recording...would bve nice to have the wireless microphone to match the sound of these...just in case i need to use all together Thanks

thanks @matthere, this software (or at the least the video you post) really seems to be suitable for what i am thinking. I know that probably AE would do the same things, but i think having a wider usage can be somehow more complex to use Am i right or wrong?

what i would like to do is start from footage i shoot, and transform it as it would be artificially created, and may be mix it with other part that are just artifical... The source from my footage should not be prepared for effects..i want to shot plain according to my taste and like if it would be the final footage. Only in pos processing it should be altered

well to say it clear, i fear it will be a long path learning AE enough to be able to work this way...because i think there is no point in making someone else working for me...there is sperimentation which is part of the process, i don't need just a piece to use somehow, it is a process i want to be able tomaster. Also consider that there is no muchincoming on this..sohiring someone has no meaning for me. Even worste is working with film, that would require also special equipments i suppose. I was wandering if there is some other software that can work smiliar, may nos so omnicomphrensive as AE, that coil be a bit easier for start with Yes..i know McLaren by the way!

i really like to go inside this technique. I read that this artist use also to process the painting on the film itself..which start to be a very hard task, though i don't know if this is the case. Could not go this way, but soemthing that allow to work in similar way would be great...But AE also it scares me..:)

Hello i 'd like to explore this way to produce video, sperimental animation. HAve a look at this for exmple..and please let me know how it is realized Thanks

when you say that you us nato rail toconnect to the camera cage, you mean the tripod connection? this? https://www.smallrig.com/smallrig-baseplate-with-dual-15mm-rod-clamp-1798.html

i have tried to look, but cannot see it properly. so you don'use nato? i have uno cold shoe on front of the handle..so i might connect the monitor there

i don't understand how can i attach a monitor while i have the top handle I got today the cage with nato and monitor connector. On th etop of my rig i have put the nato..but can't put both the handle and the monitor...

that's th epoint..i was trying to understand what steadycam would work with xt3

ok thank you..that is what seemed to me, but i was noit sure..So you don't like to use cage a part if you need a monitor..and that is obvious. WHy you don't like cage? i find can be helpfull when doing some movement of the camera...i think coulkd be more stable, moving a camera with a cage form the handle than have it in the hand..what is your opinion about?

sorry i don t understand the meaning of this sentences "Ive always found cages get in the way a bit unless you need to build things onto the camera!"...(i am not english mother tongue..) can you explain different? thank you

hello, i am going to get a smallrig cage for my xt3, i find it second hand at bargain price, so i decided. The cage come plain, no addon. What are the must have? For sure the top handle. I see there are several type LInk to tophandle in smallrig.com From thje cheapest in rubber to those muche more expensive. I don0t uderstan the difference (may a part of the material)..which one to get? What ele shoul di get other than handle? thank you

if you have good video to link ..please! thanks

as i said i have this Digislider Pro Carbon Fibre DSLR Camera Stabilizer, for me was not too bad ad a device, don't know if a glidecam can be better...i am talinkg about the manageability when setting it up. Does anyone have suggestion or link on how to get a proper balance for a steady?

yes i agree much easier with gimbal--but as i said for the use i do of it too muche money..

you said it right, i also use almost everytime the tripod or a monopod. That is why oi dont want to invest in a gimbal. I know that a steady will require more effort than a gimbal, but i am stucked in a previuius step..the setup. After setup i know i come another hard part, the learning of using it... If i just could set it up properly, would be a good starting.i am thinking...may be the gh3 was too light for that steady?xt3 is heavier..could be setup better?

hello, i am thinking to buy an old steadycam. like glidecam hd2000 with my xt3. Because i don t use it so often and because of price, now they are cheap, and more easy to use( i mean no battery and less room), i am thinking can be better of a gimbal. I have already a Digislider Pro Carbon Fibre DSLR Camera Stabilizer (it is the same then the CAME one), but when i tried to set it up with my panasonic gh3 i could never succed to get a very good balance, though it seems a good device. I thought i might depend on the stabilizer, so i think if i get a glidecam or similar i might get it to work properly. What is your opinion about?

sometimes the movements are really an abuse in quantity...they all want to move the camera 🙂

you are right, in this scene, the shake is well appropriated to the subjet. i put this link as it was the first i found, but in this case the aesthetic is clear. I just wanted to show what is the kind of movement i am talking about. i agree, this could be handheld easily. other times i don t think it is. Other times i don't see any reason to make these slight movement of the camera but they are there...Now that you know what i am talking about you ll find several example of this

for example this check the first sequence after credit

it was just about aesthetic the main reason of my post. Being graduate at cinema studies ( in my univesity the sutdies are all about thery..not practices) i am interested , a part of all the techniques parts, also about all the question regarding language, ahestetic and so on. My main think about this kind of shooting i am talking about here is that most of the time, it does not really look like motivated. To me i seems more a kind of habit, a fashion style of thelast years that should give some more "live" feel to the action. Sometimes this shake is more noticeable than other..looks like a kind of "fear" of a steady shot on a tripod

ok can be that, how is made. I want to know more, about the lanuage. Why they use this and not the tripod?what the director want to achieve with this shaking. I think that even with that shoulder mount, the image could be more stable, so i say that that shake is wanted

hello in the last years i see this kind of shot in lots of movie Camera is shooting a subect or two, or a situation, not making typical movie, pan, or tilt, but has a kind of continue little shake. Seems like if it is handheld, but i don't think it is. To me it is on a tripod and continuosly slightly moved I would like to know more about this, who can help? thanks

i mean dof of course, not dop