stefanocps

Yes quality of image for what i have seen i very very nice (though i don't know how much post production was on it, when coming to color) and it is what i am actracted at most. don't understand if prores is only via hdmi or if, in any case, the internal code is good for a smooth edit. The downside is what you said, it is not a quick camera, and this could stop me, because often use it in a kind of run and gun. Perhaps for this better black magic?i read it is the same sensor, so the quality should be the same? Do i have to buy battery also?does it have internal mic?

Hello, while i was searching for a XT4 to possibly replae my XT3 i came across some description of ezcam. Of course i knew it before, but i did not consider because its too basic setup, meaning that i would need a monitor at least and i don't know what else. Going deeper in to some articles i am realizang that it must be a very good quality camera. I have seen a sample video and it seems amazing. I am getting really interested at it, but i would like to have opinion from real users, first of all about the minimum setup needed. For my budget i think i would not go beyong the M4. Wait for your opinion, i was really excited after watching a video

i have 18 55 and 55 200 both with ois..when i think at ibis i think on walking with the camera and simulating the "trolley" movemnt..don t know if it is the correct word in english..it is a literal translation The autofocus, i say again could be a real game change

Forget to say... the biggest improvment i think i would need is the Autofocus, XT3 is not bad at all, but i think there are also much better one..then the ibis, but only if it is a real good one

I have always the need to be able to shot in run and gun mode. That means, for me, vvery good autofocus, and perhaps IBIS..but for this i can't tell for sure. I never had an IBIS, i had a panasonic GH3 before and i could not wait for the next camera to have IBIS..but i discover XT3, which did not have. I like he camera a lot and i did take it anyway..if i use gh3 without IBIS i could do the same with XT3, i thought. Actually i use it anyway. Ibis is still appealing but don't know how really is good for video. I read many opinion that for video ibis on xt4 is not that good, producing unnatural movement. I choose XT3 because of quality of image first, and because it have good specs talking about recording options. Also for autofocus, because when i bought it it as much improvemente compared to Gh3. That said i think that an evaluation could roughly be done because of the big differences in prices and because the 2 camera are not 2 different world. For example 400 euro woth for the xt4 ibis, is it so good or much better to get a gimbal if i really need ibis? That's what seems to me, those 400 euro are not a small amount, for me it is quite big amount. Is the xt4 a big upgrade?It can be nice to know what are your opinion about also, not completellyrelated to me,

400 euro to add seems a bit to much...250-300 i would do it probably

Hello, need your suggestions. I have a XT3, rarely used, so in very good conditions and i am thinking to sell it to buy an XT4. This will cost me 400 euro to add, as i can sell mine at 900 and buy a XT4 for 1300. The reason for the change will be in order 1) Ibis 2) Articulating screen (though i am getting used to the xt3 one) 3) longer battery (though i have 2 extra battery with my xt3). I also have a smallrig cage for the XT3 and i would give it with the camera. Do you think is a good idea? For what i know there are no other differences between the 2 camera and perhaps what is more important would be the IBIS. I use the camera for video 90%...but for what i have read the ibisi is not that good in video. Acutally what i would really like to improve is the autofocus, but i don't see in that price range better possibilities..even in other brand. Am i wrong? Please give me your opinin, if the upgrade worth 400 euro. Thank you

rode go seems more a reasonable, though the 2 version is gonna be higher in price while the first versione can be found second hand also. Am i wrong or the 2 is not out yet?

well i understand what you say, that said sometimes there are situation where a compromise is required. That means, trying to get the best you can with your possibility, and this is what i was aiming when writing this post. I am sure there are compromise solutions in addition to best and horrible ones 🙂

why the 3 is so unreliable?

well...if i could do 1 and 2 i would not be here asking these... 🙂

i have an idea I have got a tascam dr05, which has one of the 2 external mic broken, actually i completelly take it off the device I could use teh tascam as recorder connecting to it a cabled lavallier? the tascam is not that big, so the person could haeve it quite easily somewhere...

if i use a cabled one and a need to stay away from speaker..how do i record the sound?

ok but those are out of my budget.as i stated on first post was looking for some cheaper and acceptable alternatives, that's why i mention synco!

or do you have other suggestion?

ok, i am convinced that itis not worthy, while the other synco, ts seems better, according to Trankilstef

?

it is more expensive than rode this model..how it compares?

hello i am looking for a wireless mic to use with my fuji xt3. Don't want to pay lots of money like sennheiser or similar. I have seen the rode wireless go that seems good, and also i have seen the syncoo that is cheaper and even seems better according to some opinions. Would like to have suggestion on what to buy, is synco is really that good or other alternatives p.s. i have a rode videomic and a tascam dr40 which i use for recording...would bve nice to have the wireless microphone to match the sound of these...just in case i need to use all together Thanks

thanks @matthere, this software (or at the least the video you post) really seems to be suitable for what i am thinking. I know that probably AE would do the same things, but i think having a wider usage can be somehow more complex to use Am i right or wrong?

what i would like to do is start from footage i shoot, and transform it as it would be artificially created, and may be mix it with other part that are just artifical... The source from my footage should not be prepared for effects..i want to shot plain according to my taste and like if it would be the final footage. Only in pos processing it should be altered

well to say it clear, i fear it will be a long path learning AE enough to be able to work this way...because i think there is no point in making someone else working for me...there is sperimentation which is part of the process, i don't need just a piece to use somehow, it is a process i want to be able tomaster. Also consider that there is no muchincoming on this..sohiring someone has no meaning for me. Even worste is working with film, that would require also special equipments i suppose. I was wandering if there is some other software that can work smiliar, may nos so omnicomphrensive as AE, that coil be a bit easier for start with Yes..i know McLaren by the way!

i really like to go inside this technique. I read that this artist use also to process the painting on the film itself..which start to be a very hard task, though i don't know if this is the case. Could not go this way, but soemthing that allow to work in similar way would be great...But AE also it scares me..:)

Hello i 'd like to explore this way to produce video, sperimental animation. HAve a look at this for exmple..and please let me know how it is realized Thanks

when you say that you us nato rail toconnect to the camera cage, you mean the tripod connection? this? https://www.smallrig.com/smallrig-baseplate-with-dual-15mm-rod-clamp-1798.html