stefanocps

but if works as bad as gopro in indoor situation will not help..or you think is better than gopro?

well..this is quite nosense....the range wher ei want to move within don't go that further, because stating from m43 the object will become much biger so the alternative s a 1" sensor, that give the possibility to have a compact size and more control on image.. so there is no need to go that around...i think i have focused a range didnt'i? You said about the osmo..why?

i still think that even a 1" would be a great improvement to the gopro sensor, though

a dji osmo would be better in low light?

i forgot to mention,very important..in the point and shot scenario i want to be able to record myself, so i need to point the camera to me!

I have a Fuji XT3 and i am happy with its results. Now the thing is that gopro was a present as i like to have a camera to use in a very quick mode, and i can carry in my pocket. This is the main difference, and that's why i compare zv1 to gopro. Gopro is in my pocket, switch on and record..just like, i think, i could do with a zv1(i say that for example) So i want to be able to use it mainly in this mode, and when it is the occasion as a B camera,(but it is not mandatory)..as long as it give me acceptable result i woul use it as B camera. Gopro give me horrible results I still have my Panasoni GH3 that can also be used for the B camera pourposes The GX85, is not so bigger than ZV1 but i m sure it will not go so easily in my pocket and that make a big difference. In a point and shot, scenario,as, as you say, with a very good knoledge the 2 can compare, but still, i am almost sure that zv1 will be faster and more accurate results( starting from AF which is panasonic weakness). Of course if i use it as B camera everything change...but i want a POINT and SHot Camera that ocasionally can be used as B camera with acceptable results...not the opposite Basically i would like to have a "Digital Diary", to have it with me whenever and start to film at anytime. With some chance to be used as B camera... P.S. I still have 1 week left to send back to amazon the gopro and have full refund to invest in another camera...and i feel i need to rush to make up my mind

well don't take it litterally, similar in term of siz eit means a very compact machine. Of course gopro is as small as no compact camera can be...but there is also a in general a good difference between a compact camera like zv1 and interchangeable lens ones. Also for what i understand a compact one can have a long range lens (which is something i would like to have) in the same size, while an interchangeable camera get bulkier to get a long range lens (and probably more expensive?) Compact camera can have 1" sensor which i believe can be better than the gopro sensor..let me tell you, my samsung m51 shot inside better than gopro, for what i have seen Anyway, as long as the camera can have a good range lens, and be enough compact in size , with lens or not..yes both they will do Main thing is that should be fast to use!

i am afraid the bad performance in low light will remain I realize Gopro as a sense only if you use it in a sport activity..in the water and when you need good stabilization No more than this i am afraid

I want something quick to use, so no interchangeable lens first of all, I would use it in a various enviroment, sometimes as a B camera for kind like interview, something as a run and gun in the road... I think best thing would be at least 1" sensor..i think there is no much better options in the market, there are some rare mft or evenmore rare aps c... But NO INTERCHANGEABLE LENS! so could be a range going to a videocam like ax700 (though is no so compact) to sony rx100..and all what is around ...but better in the price range of zv1 if possibile

But ZV E10 has interchangeable lens, it is another kind of machine!

Hello, after trying to use gopro 9 indoor, for some b shot, i have realized that gopro cannot be used indoor at all. So i want to send back to amazon the gopro and buy something similar, in term of size, and fast use. So my first idea go to zv1, but i want to make sure that there are not better alternative around, better if at less price. Willing to buy 2nd hand!

yeh, i'll never think to buy a minicomputer for 750 euro..!

but you see, 256gb ramand 8gb ram..it will need upgrade for sure, storage is nothing and ram i doubt is enough Anyway a m1 like this here used is it found at notless than 750 euro..which is enough more than 750 dollars!

i meant PROCES HAVE GONE DOWN

well i am sure, there is lot of people of do that with windows And to tell more, i never liked apple philosoph, and i jhave beel always away from it. Also i need windows as i work with windows for customer, assistance, support ecc..so i always need to stay update with microsoft products In the end your mac mini for that price must have the minimum spec, and it is hard to believe that it will work so flawless with a 4k edit in premiere. What specs do you have? ram, disk ecc? Also , perhaps in Usa prices are gone done faster than here, where hw and prices are always couples of years late!

with the money i should pay for the m1 i can but my pc (which have already bought) plus any graphic card. Thanks for suggestion but it does have nothing to do with my question! 🙂

with the fast nvme now,odes it still have a sense to separate os/app from project files/cache ? ihave 1 tb nvme and i thought could be enough for all together in term of speed

i don't have playback problems in premiere, and anyway i always proxies.. I have problem with playback h264 file in windows, with vlc, mediaplayer or other, but i can play smooth with the old app mpc. I don't have problem in playing back in windows h264 files though This was my enquire, why h264 are not smooth and h265 are? What you mean for multiple drive setup?

what about the amd?like rx580?

this is good suggestion I was thinking about a 1660 also, probably 1070 will come out something cheaper How do 1660 compare to those you mentioned?

i was not looking for a fast videocard, but for one better than my gtx760 at a price that can be worthy doing the upgrade It never happened to me to have pc render all the night, and i think i'll keep working with proxies even with a better videocard as the rest of the pc is not a monster. My project are usually at 2k, with files shot at 4k, and on average are within 15 minutes lenght, or less I use some fx, not that much, some cc..So i can still work now, but if for a reasonable money i can get a better performance then it'is fine, otherwise i mighht wait till the price of vga become normal

i do edit very few time for money. I do my projects, for creativity, and personal and artistic pourpouses, but mostly not for money, and expecially never with time in a hurry. I spent around 350 euro for the pc, buying second hand parts..don t see logical spending the double for the card alone I have been working in the past year with my laptop with i7 7700 and ght 1050. Of course i need to works with proxies, and render time are not fast, but i never felt being limited in this way, though i know i woul dlike to have somehting better But you know, it is not always possible to have things in the way you wish at the most, and compromise are needed Graphic card is one of this. I never think to spend 600, 700 euro for a graphic card..not now at least! My post here is just for this, to find the best combination that consider saving and effectiveness

well..they seems the same big price of all the other

Hello, i put up a new pc for my video editing in premiere. Well, i am on a budget and i gathered all 2nd hand parts to make I have ryzen 7 3700, 32gb ram,an asus tuf b550 mb and a nvme. I'am still using my old graphic, gtx 760, and i think it would be nice to have something better But as you know prices for vga are crazy, i don't want to pay for vga more than for the whole pc! I am searching for used gtx1660 or 1070..but still expensive, more than my pc! In premiere i made some little edit and it seems not too bad, work with proxies But there is a strange thing, if i play with a player clip from my xt3...h265 400mbs are fine, they play smooth If i play h264 they are choppy..they are not playable. I tried different players and it is like that for all, but the old app mpc, that is quite fine I don't know if this depends on the vga, though h265 are fine.. What do you think? And in case, what vga shall i go for not paying ridicolous money?or may it is not that worthy and it might be better to keep my 760, waiting for when prices reduce?? Thanks

mmm when? a brand new cpu might cost more