stefanocps

you say that if i buy this i need to buy a good one (metabones, not viltrox fpr example) otherwise it will spoil image right?

about adapter...what about a focal reducer, is it worthy or i can go good with a simply adapter?

Hello i just got my xt3 and i feel a bit confused for so many things inside to learn.While starting to study i would like to have some info on accessories i would need Cards: i have few cards, sandisk sdxc 1,, 10 and 3, 90mb speed(don't know exactly what the difference for the 2 standing) the other is sandisk sdxc 1 only 10, 30mb, then i have another sandisk sdxc 1 that only report a 3 So i suppose the first could be ok to use, the opther are not good enough Usb c cable, is it worthy to buy it? A film cover for the display also is better to have it? i have a bunch of minolta rokkor lens, what adapter would you suggest I use XT3 for VIDEO! thanks a lot

Ok.but he would not suggest the sigma apart for the shallower dof right?why?

sorry don't understand exactly You saying that with 18-55 it is not easy to get a shallow dof?

Wheter they are not exactly in the same price range what would you choose between the 2? I like to have a quick setup and quick use for most of the situation. In this side they seems both good, perhaps A7 little better because of stabilizer. Also is importantforme to have a good image straight out of the camera, as i am not that good in grading, so the more is good as it is the file, the best is. Another point is the workability of the file, as i have not so new pc. Last is the lens, the sony being FF i am afraid it will cost me much more to have those minimum couple of lenses needed for video. So resuming, good looking image, good af, stabilizer if possible and budget... Thanks for suggestions

with all the technology in the cameras now, i think the main point to develpo is the workability of files form pc. Seems like even lates pc struggle with most of the neweset camera's file. That is a bad point for me. FIles should be easily processed from most of the pcs, unless they are old

it is too long and difficult to undesrtand for me Does it say anything about xt3 vs gh5? thanks

hello i am thinking to make a step forward from the choice gh5/xt3 and try to make an effort , in therm of expense, for the next level, z6 o a7iii (i exclude s1 as too expensive) This way i will have a tool that will give me about all the option, good af, stabilzation, good quality and of course ff, and i don t have to loose af or stabilization if going for gh5/xt3. Now considering i would buy with kit lenses which one would you suggest between the 2 ff? thanks for helping

looked to me exagerated, but you know...the matter is to understand where is the real point of weakness

Reading around forum to understand which could be my camera (xt3 also is incliuded) i come across some really contarstant opininons regarding sony and panaAbout GH5, wheter is known to be not that good at low iso, i read sometimes that even at 400 iso the camera pproduce bad footage, almost unusable. Is that true? About Sony..well half of th epeople say is the bet, oter say is the worst...grat color scienze/horrible color science good overall lexperience/lots of trouble...and so on. What is your experience with that? thanka

I agree with the price too high os s1. That is only thing that stop me getting it. The others limitation... I don t see them when i watch s1 footage

that is what it seems to me Image look great straight out of the camera, much more than what it is in gh5 and (vene if less) xt3 That is for me a great value as am notr so good in grading , neither i wish to became...i like natural image, and what it comes out from s1 seems so good as it is...also z6 have this impression

Ok you talk about low light and sensor and those are obvious bemefit. I talk about image quality. Footage i see from s1 look wonderful. Don t have same sensation with xt3 and expecially with gh5 footage. What you think about?

While comparing gh5 and xt3 to choose which i prefer, i see now and then some S1 footage that look really amazing. Of course is another price range, but for what i see there is no competition with gh5 and xt3 and certainly deserve some more savings to go for it I don t see much talk about S1, any opinion?

lend me some money!

To be more specific: to be able to get to most from bm do i need to be good at grading? I have couple of mft lenses plus several minolta vintage so no lens prblem either for gh5 or bm.either i wouldnt mind xt3 with kit lens to start. So lens is not a real issue.issue could be what stop to have a flawlessy workflow without the need to rigging a lot or postproducing a lot

i thought it could be a solution, reselling the bm sill be very easy

it s not easy, there is XT3 competiting

Onr question about.codec.Are.files produced easy to work with better han those h265 from fuji for example that require very performint pc?also would like to know if i can get ready good footage may be with lut not being that good (yet) in grading?

here it is not easy, normally takes weeks, unnambered weeks I found a place that have a couple available Anyway rush or not, those are my doubt when thinking to bmpcc, which looks great for images but less for ease of usability

Hello i have the possibility to get a bpcc4 quick. I never look too much at this camera because of long waiting list and because it seemed a camera that would require too many accessories, so i was going to xt3 or gh5. Now with this chance i need to decide quick. I ask you what do i need to have, other than the camera, to be able to work in a kind of documentary style, run and gun and similar battery,card,rig..what is really needed? For better understanding: a proper videocamera would be my first choice for quick possibility to operate. But as you know, videocamera would give much less in term of quality image and creativity...but my approach, for my need, would be the one i would have with a proper videocamera (i mean sony a700, panasnic hcx1 and so on..) thanks

right i got confused..everytime i smelll blackmagic i quickly jmp to conlusions

buying bmpcc is nearly impossibile right now, so better go elsewhere

there is something i notice. In many of the videomakers forums, fuji looks like being mostly ignored, i don t see iscussions, excitment, ecc about this fuji, and i wonder why. They keep talking panasonic, sony, new nikon ecc..but very little xt3