stefanocps

what is WUSS? No bmpcc for me, first beacuse it is complicated to use with all the addons it needs and last bat not least i don t want wait endllessy before getting it!

i found it at 1200 euro but i need at least to double it to use it. Would have been nice option though is quite far from the possibility of "fast use" that i am looking for You can image i start my search thinkin i would have for a camcorder like panasonic HCX1 or Sony NX80, but little by little i realize that i would not live without the possibility of manipulating image and dof, all this creative part...

yes it was a quick dream..not really suitable for my needs and budget

in my country there are now 2 at 1300, in a second hand magazine. But i fear we need to add at least the same amount to be ready to use it, for lens and recorder. So that go beyond the budget

wow this FS700 seems amazing. I have a couple listed in second hand for 1300 euro. Can you tell me more about this videocamera? First thing i want to know is how it beahve in a not planned situation, is it fast enough the use of it?what about autofocus, stabilization and low light?Another thing crucial is what do i need to buy with it? Of course lenses, i would go for a zomm lens to have it all in one, what lens would you suggest'Also i see it would need an externalrecorder. Which one will be needed? I fear all together the amount will rise enough above 3000 euro.. Most probably for an eng style at my budget gh5/gh5s or xt3/xh1 are the way to go

so what you use most gh5 or ls300? ls300 is really interesting tools. The best in the market as IDEA. Can t tell much about real use, a part the af not so good (as you state) and lack of stabilization

i wasn't consider gh4, definitely old machine, but the statemente about the color depth

i don t consider at all bm, tooc omplicated to use, while i want to have a cam that can be used as most as possible as camcorder, in term of speed of use. And anyway i wouldn t get into the nightmare of a never ending wait for it

Just found this What you think? https://***URL removed***/forums/post/53141471 This could simplify some thing

I will edit definitely on 2k also.i want the 4k only because i can crop and this expand edit possibilies. So one of the 3 fuji or gh5...

xt20 or 30? Yes you touch an importan tpoint the editing possibility of h265,..that scares me, my pc is oggd, was ood, t is 4 years old and i fear it could be a nightmare working with xt3 files I wouldnt struggle with xt30 right? or may be i will have less hard time with XH1 also?what about gh5's files?

too sharp, a times seems so electronic image

yes may be t is not the color what i talk about, (though i think the red dominant is still there) but more is the sharpness. Also i had lots of problem with my gh3, the dial get spolled 2 times...Can't really tell, as i sadi may be it is only a prejudice. But i am with you., with the potentital GH5 looks still a great camera and it is still my possibile choice along wit XT3 i don t do either intensive grading, with gh3 i could o little because of my knoledge but also because of the machine itself. I always have wished to be able to do more grading though, and i don t know how the 8 vs 10 bit and 422 vs 420 could affect me (compared to the possibility gh3 offfered me)

may be xt3 is overall and worthy better option over xt30

i think xt3 witn 18 55 could really be the one for me, and if needed i could get later a gimbal. Still i could save money getting xh1 or xt30. How will it change in practice the difference 8/10 bit recording?What are the specs on hdmi recording with xt30? i know what you mean, gh5 also is a real otpion for me too. What stop me is 1) it is old technbology right now.2/3 years makes a lot of difference. And anothe r thinf g is that wether i know gh3 is another world from gh5 they have something in common, i thonk it is t he panasonic flavour. And i am kind of fedup with this flavour. For sure with a good cc the flavour change totally, i am talking about the filke played has it comes out from the machine. Most probably it is only a prejudice

yes this is not really a point for me. I think never recorded up to 29 minutes

what you using now, gh5? anyway it seems that the choice is gh5 or XT3(or xh1 for more lenses options with same budget)

that is why i try to go for a camera with a usable kit lens

with a big effort i coul go slightly over 2k euro

ok what facilities offer for manual focus then?is there a way to rack focus? or focus assist?

c100 is well above my budget, can t consider it. 4k is a must, not because i deliver at 4k but for the cropping possibility that expand a lot the possibility when editing

does it have stabilization?what about autofocus, is it reliable?

fz2000 looks like that acamcorder i had thought about, perhaps will have same unreliable focus as panasonic have, and little control on dof, not a great image then? don t know havent checke any test yet. GH5 is for sure a good point, also for price, and at that range only XT3 could compete I have thought about LS300 that it is a real interesting camera. But the question, as you posted as well, is how worthy is buyng an old technology today?

never said i am a professional I want to do nice worjk for film festival, few month one was accepted in one festival, and this push me to do better and invest in something better, as at the screeneing festival the quality of my footage was weak compared to all the other

i got 2 general lumix lenses 14-42 and 45 175. Plus i have a bunch of vintage lenses, from MInolta Rokkor, and few from olympus and canon, but these could be used in other camera also, sint' it? So i really have 2 lumix lenses, and not the best. For what i have read for example Both Fuji and Nikon have a kit lenses that are supposed to be much better than those Lumix Kit lenses i own