stefanocps

it s not easy, there is XT3 competiting

Onr question about.codec.Are.files produced easy to work with better han those h265 from fuji for example that require very performint pc?also would like to know if i can get ready good footage may be with lut not being that good (yet) in grading?

here it is not easy, normally takes weeks, unnambered weeks I found a place that have a couple available Anyway rush or not, those are my doubt when thinking to bmpcc, which looks great for images but less for ease of usability

Hello i have the possibility to get a bpcc4 quick. I never look too much at this camera because of long waiting list and because it seemed a camera that would require too many accessories, so i was going to xt3 or gh5. Now with this chance i need to decide quick. I ask you what do i need to have, other than the camera, to be able to work in a kind of documentary style, run and gun and similar battery,card,rig..what is really needed? For better understanding: a proper videocamera would be my first choice for quick possibility to operate. But as you know, videocamera would give much less in term of quality image and creativity...but my approach, for my need, would be the one i would have with a proper videocamera (i mean sony a700, panasnic hcx1 and so on..) thanks

right i got confused..everytime i smelll blackmagic i quickly jmp to conlusions

buying bmpcc is nearly impossibile right now, so better go elsewhere

there is something i notice. In many of the videomakers forums, fuji looks like being mostly ignored, i don t see iscussions, excitment, ecc about this fuji, and i wonder why. They keep talking panasonic, sony, new nikon ecc..but very little xt3

My doubt is not referred to the final quality of the image, but to the moment i am using the camera for work.that means facilities, confortable, confident, quick of use, reliability, something that would let me forget about the tecnological tool in fabour of the creative tool

when i watch xt3 post i want to buy xt3, when i watch gh5 posts i want to buy gh5.. how to get out of this?

i 'd like to partecièate too!

i have kind of same impression, but i see professionals that work with xt3

for what you write i reckon you prefer gh5! isn't it?

https://fotodioxpro.com/products/md-fxrf-p

vintage ones yes, someone told me it does, of course those who have adapter. for my minolta rookor there is adaptor

for what i have read 18 55 is a kit lens and it is really good, perhaps one of the best kit kens ever. it has ois and could be very useful for most situation. Then i know lens adpter can be used, surely for vintage ones, perhpas for m43 ones too, but not sure

Anyway, at the end looks like that GH5 and XT3 are the best solution, roughly at the same price range. Both are great machine, one has some nice specs and some cons,, the other has got other nice specs and also some cons;looks like it is difficult to decide!?

Is is a matter of being compact yes, but also and first i would say it is a matter of budget. Body, lenses and recorder the price goes enough up to go beyond any possibilities of consideration. I would not mind considerate such a nice tool, or even the ls300 but the price go to far, almost the double than what i would need for a GH5 or XT3

thanks this is about technical question on how to do it But what about the idea that is laying down on the it?why people call cinematic something whic is far opposite to cinema?

Looking around to buy a nex camera, i come across several video that are presented as "cinematic style" Made with gh5,xt3,bmpcc or whatever their feature is a color that is strongly characterized. I like them and i think i should buy a camera that would allow me to do that. Then i watch a movie, at cinema or tv and the color is totally different. It is the opposite of what is defined cinematic style in slr videos. In this case colo is true color, natural, as well as light and everyhting else So what is the cinematic style?? What is your opinion about? I want to reach the latter style in my video, not the first one...

for what i read it must have an external monitor, an external power supply unit, then you have no autofocus...it can be used for planned situation but much more difficult for quick need and one man band,But the real issue(and also the biggest complication) is..how to get it?

hard choiche(gh5 xt3) though

right, but i don t understand, is the h265 that allow me that or is because the 10 bit recording is only in h265?

don't understand when h265 is really needed?

for what i have seen the 18 55 kit lens is really not to bad with its ois. Then i might add a gimbal later to use with my vintage lenses, but in general i use them totally in manual, that means on a tripod. So th stabilization part is no more a big point. Fuji has got aps c which is really interesting, while gh5 produce files that can be edited more easily than those in xt3. Also i like the much better battery life in gh5. Overall xt3 is more tempting to me than gh5. I have the idea that files it produces, without cc, cold be nicer than those produced without cc from gh5

to be in my confortable range of money to invest i think the choice is norrowed down between gh5 and fuji xt3