Jump to content

Orangenz

Members
  • Posts

    829
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Orangenz

  1. 8 hours ago, Trek of Joy said:

    GH5s - as in s35? JVC has already done a s35 sensor with a m43 mount - that's assuming the helicopter pic is the new camera (and not just a button add-on to a GH5 to make hitting rec easier) since it sporting what looks like the 8-18mm lens.

    I can't take credit for that one as it was mentioned earlier in one of these threads. Buuuuut Panasonic could be looking at recouping costs of developing that sensor by placing it in a hybrid body. Though the $2500 price speculation seems unlikely if that were the case. With a larger sensor you get more DR and the much loved multi aspect possibilities.

    What if the GH5s had the Varicam LT sensor and came in at say ... $4999? A C1/200/FS5 killa?

    Fun to speculate.

    no

  2. 7 minutes ago, Neumann Films said:

    Me thinks you guys are looking for the wrong things here.  It's mildly comical ?

    I'm just going with the flow with the hope you find it entertaining. :D 

    It's something with the tripod isn't it?

    What I can't work out is how you point the camera at the robot, with the sun apparently behind his head, without lighting, and yet his face is lit up like crazy with no noise. 

  3. 3 hours ago, Jonesy Jones said:

    Then why would he photoshop it out?

    Anyway, if you look at Luke's video..... no red button.

    5a1e289904747_ScreenShot2017-11-28at10_22_26PM.png.fc9ff888974ce50ba9d73defd312d8b4.png

    And yet every GH5 has a red dot on the button which you can't see either... in that shot... Anyway, on something completely different, has anyone seen my black marker pen?

  4. 11 hours ago, jonpais said:

    If you examine Mr. Neumann’s video carefully, you’ll notice that the color orange and the American flag figure prominently, so I’m wagering it’s some kind of surveillance camera.

    All good videos should have these.

    2 hours ago, IronFilm said:

    I only just realised that is the right number of asterisks for "LUMIX GH5S"

     

    So like post number three from this thread? 

  5. 2 hours ago, Juxx989 said:

    Thought I would post some deals I see for us here... as this is subject that only has a 24 hour life span I hope the thread is deleted soon after 

    If anybody else finds anything interesting for the community please post it here!

     

    Found a canon T6 with 18-55 + 75-300 for $250 

    https://shop.usa.canon.com/shop/en/catalog/eos-rebel-t6-ef-s-18-55-with-ef-75-300mm-f-4-56-iii-refurbished?WT.mc_id=C126149

    Thinking about getting it just to have a magic latern machine

     

    Best to use existing thread 

     

  6. On 05/11/2017 at 2:17 PM, jonpais said:

    @Cinegain ? Wish I’d been warned first that this was a wolfcrow production... 

     

    On 05/11/2017 at 1:32 PM, Cinegain said:

    lol, dies guy xD

    "So it's a stupid idea to shoot HLG, please ignore those people who say that you need to shoot HLG for more high dynamic range, they obviously have no idea what they're talking about. [..] Ignore it completely."

    Uhhhh... bro! Like they'll just add a feature for shits 'n giggles. Found his earlier stuff analysis of stuff interesting, but to dismiss and discourage HLG is bit messed up.

    No he has special issues and incorrect things in all his stuff. Best to stay far far away from "india's best colourist". 

  7. 5 hours ago, HockeyFan12 said:

    I believe you, I just don't see how that would be a problem under normal circumstances.

    Does it crop more than the other software solutions you listed? I feel like I'm missing something. I'll definitely hold off until reviews are in, though.

    This is not advertised for normal circumstances, rather, extreme circumstances. I believe it crops more, yes. And yes, wait for the reviews of a release version, if it is ever released. 

    2 hours ago, HockeyFan12 said:

    Still curious why there's so much hate for this product.

    A lot is from interaction with the company over many years with great periods of no communication or false release info or status. New people are coming on board and there is literally zero difference in status or videos from many years ago when first put forward and the old guard have given up. 

    1 hour ago, cantsin said:

    No software stabilization, no SteadXP, can remove these damages to the image. You need proper hardware stabilization - through a steadycam, gimbal or good in-camera optical stabilization - to avoid this.

    ^^ this

  8. 1 hour ago, HockeyFan12 said:

    What are micro vibrations and why can't they be reduced in post?

    Relatively large motions (low frequency) affect the entire image and thus can be processed out. Higher frequency oscillations show up the rolling shutter coming off a sensor and some processing can be done. The highest frequency oscillations corrupt each frame and little can be done to remove this. What camera do you have? 

  9. 48 minutes ago, HockeyFan12 said:

    Just out of curiosity, what is "sensor jarring" and what in the video above looks better to you from the other stabilization solutions? I'm pretty new to stabilization and was considering applying for a gig involving post stabilization, so I'm trying to brush up on the current state of the art. 

    Micro vibrations to the sensor cannot be taken out by anything in post. IBIS and gimbals have really decreased this a lot. Steadxp just routes external motion data through onto an audio track through the mic port. Unfortunately andrgl doesn't understand it, or the long history of this company that I have followed. I'm sure you've heard many people say to avoid using electronic stabilisation on cameras. Just don't bother ;) 

  10. 13 hours ago, HockeyFan12 said:

    So cool. Absolutely incredible results.

    It's really not. Terrible crop which raises artifacts. Only software solution in post and I bet they are using normal frame analysis as well. This cannot fix any sensor jarring. This is based on the assumption that motion sensor data that they gather separately and send through the mic input can improve on electronic IS on board cameras which themselves use motion sensor data actually on-board PLUS other types of post involving picture analysis. Both of which involve less picture degradation. Also this was never aimed at the cinema crowd, it was funded on the basis of small dslrs and action cams. If they are changing that then it shows another failure. Mercali, Warp, Hyperlapse Pro, NewBlue 5, and of course, Reelsteady are clearly superior. I really believe steadxp is a gimmick and borderline something else. 

  11. 5 hours ago, Mat Mayer said:

    I was hoping it would be a video camera, a G80 upgrade/baby GH5 with the video features for HDR 4K. Is it necessary to have the 10 bit HLG 400 bitrate features the GH5 has to count as HDR 4K video?

    If so, will have to get a big GH5. If not, the G80 is very reasonably priced in the UK at the moment (£529). With my damaged and customized G7 it would probably cost less than £400, or £300 or less for one in good condition.

    If you select Rec Quality MP4 HEVC ("TV or recorder that supports hybrid log gamma is required") on the GH5, then the available options become 4K 72M 30p and 4K 72M 24p. 

    This is different from selecting Hybrid Log Gamma as a photostyle and using the 400M all-i codec, but it still counts as "4K HDR recording"

  12. All example shots of it over the years have had a huge crop. Technology (software and hardware) has left the idea behind in the dust. Also the delays have left most investors with an underwhelming view of the company. Still not released? I doubt it ever will. 

×
×
  • Create New...