-
Posts
829 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Articles
Posts posted by Orangenz
-
-
30 minutes ago, Roberto Tolin Sommer said:
Another attempt with the GH3 and the 1.000mm catadripotic tele. Jupiter and four moons, Europa, Io, Ganimede and Callisto.
My photo of Jupiter 6 June. The labeled dots are moons. 1) Ganymede, 2) Europa, 3) Io, 4) Callisto. GH5 with 100-400 - I guess i need to underexpose a fair bit?
-
5 minutes ago, Roberto Tolin Sommer said:
Amazing to see the moon going the opposite, from right to left. In the northern hemisphere it goes from left to right.
And weird to look south to see the sun when visiting the North hehe
-
My try with the GH5
and with the GH4
About due to have another go with the updated firmware.
-
4 minutes ago, DBounce said:
Are the bts shots also done with the new camera?
GH5
-
7 minutes ago, Neumann Films said:
Me thinks you guys are looking for the wrong things here. It's mildly comical ?
I'm just going with the flow with the hope you find it entertaining. :D
It's something with the tripod isn't it?
What I can't work out is how you point the camera at the robot, with the sun apparently behind his head, without lighting, and yet his face is lit up like crazy with no noise.
-
-
-
40 minutes ago, jonpais said:
hmmm... emoticons....must be some newly improved face detection.
Faces have two eyes, expect a dual lens video camera! One shoots black and white low light, the other colour. Images combined in camera!
-
-
11 hours ago, jonpais said:
If you examine Mr. Neumann’s video carefully, you’ll notice that the color orange and the American flag figure prominently, so I’m wagering it’s some kind of surveillance camera.
All good videos should have these.
2 hours ago, IronFilm said:I only just realised that is the right number of asterisks for "LUMIX GH5S"
So like post number three from this thread?
-
1 hour ago, Neumann Films said:
Real suit!
Looking real good there Luke. You've obviously been working out with a great body.
-
5 hours ago, Neumann Films said:
Horrid compression here ..
Any tips for getting less compression here?
Click it three times and it opens up full size in another window. Pretty darn amazing.
Did you want the product placement?
-
2 hours ago, Juxx989 said:
Thought I would post some deals I see for us here... as this is subject that only has a 24 hour life span I hope the thread is deleted soon after
If anybody else finds anything interesting for the community please post it here!
Found a canon T6 with 18-55 + 75-300 for $250
Thinking about getting it just to have a magic latern machine
Best to use existing thread
-
9 hours ago, Vesku said:
Yes I was shooting videos, thousands and thousands
Sure...
-
On 05/11/2017 at 2:17 PM, jonpais said:
@Cinegain ? Wish I’d been warned first that this was a wolfcrow production...
On 05/11/2017 at 1:32 PM, Cinegain said:lol, dies guy xD
"So it's a stupid idea to shoot HLG, please ignore those people who say that you need to shoot HLG for more high dynamic range, they obviously have no idea what they're talking about. [..] Ignore it completely."
Uhhhh... bro! Like they'll just add a feature for shits 'n giggles. Found his earlier stuff analysis of stuff interesting, but to dismiss and discourage HLG is bit messed up.
No he has special issues and incorrect things in all his stuff. Best to stay far far away from "india's best colourist".
-
-
No V-Log, HDR or anamorphic.
But it has Cine-D, Cine-V, 150MBps 4K 60, 180fps full HD.
And both 4K and full HD video are using full sensor width, full resolution read out then downsize
-
5 hours ago, HockeyFan12 said:
I believe you, I just don't see how that would be a problem under normal circumstances.
Does it crop more than the other software solutions you listed? I feel like I'm missing something. I'll definitely hold off until reviews are in, though.
This is not advertised for normal circumstances, rather, extreme circumstances. I believe it crops more, yes. And yes, wait for the reviews of a release version, if it is ever released.
2 hours ago, HockeyFan12 said:Still curious why there's so much hate for this product.
A lot is from interaction with the company over many years with great periods of no communication or false release info or status. New people are coming on board and there is literally zero difference in status or videos from many years ago when first put forward and the old guard have given up.
1 hour ago, cantsin said:No software stabilization, no SteadXP, can remove these damages to the image. You need proper hardware stabilization - through a steadycam, gimbal or good in-camera optical stabilization - to avoid this.
^^ this
-
1 hour ago, HockeyFan12 said:
That makes sense. If the oscillation is happening at a frequency greater than
Film something and knock the side of the camera.
-
1 hour ago, HockeyFan12 said:
What are micro vibrations and why can't they be reduced in post?
Relatively large motions (low frequency) affect the entire image and thus can be processed out. Higher frequency oscillations show up the rolling shutter coming off a sensor and some processing can be done. The highest frequency oscillations corrupt each frame and little can be done to remove this. What camera do you have?
-
48 minutes ago, HockeyFan12 said:
Just out of curiosity, what is "sensor jarring" and what in the video above looks better to you from the other stabilization solutions? I'm pretty new to stabilization and was considering applying for a gig involving post stabilization, so I'm trying to brush up on the current state of the art.
Micro vibrations to the sensor cannot be taken out by anything in post. IBIS and gimbals have really decreased this a lot. Steadxp just routes external motion data through onto an audio track through the mic port. Unfortunately andrgl doesn't understand it, or the long history of this company that I have followed. I'm sure you've heard many people say to avoid using electronic stabilisation on cameras. Just don't bother
-
13 hours ago, HockeyFan12 said:
So cool. Absolutely incredible results.
It's really not. Terrible crop which raises artifacts. Only software solution in post and I bet they are using normal frame analysis as well. This cannot fix any sensor jarring. This is based on the assumption that motion sensor data that they gather separately and send through the mic input can improve on electronic IS on board cameras which themselves use motion sensor data actually on-board PLUS other types of post involving picture analysis. Both of which involve less picture degradation. Also this was never aimed at the cinema crowd, it was funded on the basis of small dslrs and action cams. If they are changing that then it shows another failure. Mercali, Warp, Hyperlapse Pro, NewBlue 5, and of course, Reelsteady are clearly superior. I really believe steadxp is a gimmick and borderline something else.
-
5 hours ago, Mat Mayer said:
I was hoping it would be a video camera, a G80 upgrade/baby GH5 with the video features for HDR 4K. Is it necessary to have the 10 bit HLG 400 bitrate features the GH5 has to count as HDR 4K video?
If so, will have to get a big GH5. If not, the G80 is very reasonably priced in the UK at the moment (£529). With my damaged and customized G7 it would probably cost less than £400, or £300 or less for one in good condition.
If you select Rec Quality MP4 HEVC ("TV or recorder that supports hybrid log gamma is required") on the GH5, then the available options become 4K 72M 30p and 4K 72M 24p.
This is different from selecting Hybrid Log Gamma as a photostyle and using the 400M all-i codec, but it still counts as "4K HDR recording"
-
All example shots of it over the years have had a huge crop. Technology (software and hardware) has left the idea behind in the dust. Also the delays have left most investors with an underwhelming view of the company. Still not released? I doubt it ever will.
“The Middle Path”: A Lumix GH5s Short
In: Cameras
Posted
no