Emanuel

Without mention the more it works the more they sell their glass. Looks like a most value than cameras BTW: https://1kcreatives.com/camera-sales-statistics-market-share/ https://www.cined.com/three-million-cameras-sold-canon-and-nikon-shine-with-financial-results/ When imaging sector sells a way less than a half, printing market segment is still their core business though: https://global.canon/en/ir/library/results.html Canon stands as a colossal giant :- )

R5C ! (Sorry, couldn't resist LOL ; )

https://www.bhphotovideo.com/explora/computers/news/apple-m2-pro-max-chips-macbook-mac-mini https://www.apple.com/newsroom/2023/01/apple-unveils-m2-pro-and-m2-max-next-generation-chips-for-next-level-workflows/ https://www.apple.com/newsroom/2023/01/apple-introduces-new-mac-mini-with-m2-and-m2-pro-more-powerful-capable-and-versatile-than-ever/ https://www.apple.com/newsroom/2023/01/apple-unveils-macbook-pro-featuring-m2-pro-and-m2-max/ WOW :- )

Guys, I love this thread but there is here one directly related on topic instead:

Indeed : ) Pity the slow frame rates this time. Promising in any way whatsoever.

Any real test out there?

PDAF is a risky step for Panasonic, only manual focus shooters will buy the old stuff from now on and GH6 as well the other L mount offers are too recent and marvelous tools to be outdated on sales side. I believe reason why they have resisted. Too long IMO, but better late than never anyway : D

VR whether 360 or 180 just means a whole new realm for traditional media and content too with lots of goodies to bring and explore we can't ignore at all as tools they can assume to be and by misfortune people invariably here tend to forget and/or pass by. - EAG :- )

Man, thanks for your posts on these three option routes (before along with GoPro 11 / FX30) I sincere praise as best ones out there : ) Much appreciated for your tests (now on VR180 potential side WOW) I also guess match your shooting style. This RAW sample then says a lot from it how brings some real upgrade, not only specs on the paper : ) PS: I am just a bit stuck on EF lenses because of the revolutionary new Panny AF offer now to pair IBIS and all the usual goodies coming from them, we'll need to couple both I'm afraid LOL ;- )

For sure : P

I believe God had mercy of us.

People are eager this announcement for too long already, I guess. Seems a winner and irresistible too... to my eyes. - EAG :- ) PS: Many people have wondered myself straight on private. Hope my link to here to this EOSHD thread and the videos you've posted may clear up current and further doubts ; )

*DIS (EIS whatever) While walking, no miracles, gimbal instead.

Yes, EIS & OIS...

R5C

Impressive to say the least : ) You've used anamorphics right? ; ) Do you upsample it once when desqueezed from anamorphic acquistion to the timeline or export?

What ISO values? BTW does 4K 120fps offer audio recording included @200 Mbps too?

Thanks : ) also to you and everyone too! - EAG

Here you have a fair comparison and where one and the other one can sing, respectively:

Do you remember the ISOs used on the slowmo shots (4K 120fps right?) for the minutes 00:03, 00:07, 00:30, 02:00, 02:26, 03:28, 03:46 (with artifacts more visible in the dark areas after 00:36, 02:08, 02:30, 03:32, 03:57)?

In any case, it is natural the shooter had often used a very high set of ISO values which will naturally increase noise artifacts more visible in the dark areas such as those blacks and blues. Not apples to oranges. That's the only way to compare tools.

On 00:14 I don't notice anything but on the rest, yes, you're right although that looks like to me the introduction of compression artifacts, not necessarily coming from the native files : ) You're watching processed pictures, not the original acquisition. Anything adultered is nothing about the ones SOOC. You can only have an accurate idea when you face that stuff the camera directly produced, shot by the device without any further processing or you can fairly infer that's noise introduced later on.

Maybe compression or your display? I don't see anything wrong on mine even @ 1080p resolution other than the beauty of the footage, well shot and a bit pleasant grainy : ) What exactly have you found? Can you post some grabs as samples about what bothers you actually?

Posted a reply to your quote on this dedicated thread open to discuss how to go steady and alike stuff: