Emanuel

Little great events cam indeed... the best one IMO : ) My hat to these DJI guys : -)

Indeed. The same difference we'll find out between ISO 1000 and 1250...

Buddy, you know why you've always been one of my fav posters for years if not longer than a decade now, wherever you are ; ) a breeze welcome to any users community again, thanks to you too @Andrew Reid : -)

Thanks @Mattias Burling for your input but why not ETTR exactly going on P4K...? Puzzles me... : ) CS is working there, no doubts, but as Anthony posted, you blow up your results if not address any eventual trouble there with ETTR as much as the earlier models : -)

The fourth, first and second ones really deserve to be screened at the original resolution... great results : -)

I am used to get outstanding results blurring the oversharpened outcome when necessary : -)

Or the old Sony to be honest... ; -)

“GW1 is equipped with a Dual Conversion Gain (DCG) that converts the received light into an electric signal according to the illumination of the environment. This allows the sensor to optimize its full well capacity (FWC), utilizing the collected light more efficiently especially in bright environments” https://www.hindustantimes.com/tech/48mp-isn-t-enough-next-redmi-smartphone-to-feature-64mp-camera/story-pFbEtxqrre5QNprYgwBfFI.html https://www.techfoe.com/2019/07/redmi-to-soon-launch-smartphone-with.html https://www.indiatoday.in/technology/news/story/redmi-64mp-camera-smartphone-will-launch-soon-with-four-rear-cameras-xiaomi-confirms-1572804-2019-07-24

From actual EURGBP exchange rates, we live interesting camera pricing times nowadays especially to those outside Britain in EU as myself used to have British suppliers. Before brexit you're even still able to buy from UK with no fees extra charge. With Boris as PM, no-deal brexit becomes closer or not? https://moneymaven.io/mishtalk/economics/brexit-early-elections-coming-but-how-early-lot We're living decisive times in fact for many generations to come and not only in UK very likely, but also in general for everyone's lives, History is made today! : -)

That's exactly my understanding, Jonesy, as well. H.265 as H.264 successor, I see it as designed for delivery or suitable as you wish, even though, H.264 had been successfully used for video capture in most affordable devices as you Andrew accurately mention, so I follow and agree with your point too, no matter what : ) As Niels Bohr wisely told us, a vulgar truth is a premise whose contrary is a falsity when a deep truth is a premise whose opposite is also a deep truth ; ) ProRes which was previously designed for post processing, is the finest example as useful acquisition tool and popular professional video capture standard today : -)

Even though, a set of stronger and more efficient codecs designed for acquisition would not hurt at all... ; -)

I understand compression method is the best way to call it. People vulgarly call it codec as I did above : ) If you can have distinct bit rate ratios, you'll have more than one to literally define it or in a more lato sensu, a variation of them. Not really sure if we should call it in a single form, anyway. I don't see anything wrong to be hair-splitting with use of words or concepts. I think this is coming from my legal academic background at first sight : -D You our Odin @webrunner5? I don't think that Computer GPU codec vs video camera stuff applies as excuse to put Andrew to rest ; ) Even though as previously said, H.265 is merely designed for delivery, not acquisition : -)

Thanks for your like added, Don @webrunner5 : ) Still back to topic BTW, the problem is not exactly when there is a compromise, but when such necessary ingredients compromise quality a way further. Rather than preventing a solid post production usage range. Here's why raw or/and bit depth are priceless indeed. Without mention bit rate (E : -)

Right. Thanks to correct me : ) I mean, the compression scheme based there as much as raw is, when not uncompressed but finest compressed, as for example REDCODE file format is in the distinct variants. Big difference : -) The bit rate addressed to data savings goal would be pretty irrelevant if only not when the result is a compromise. As hinted above-posted, lower bit depth doesn't help either when a higher end is mandatory. E : -)

How's in your jurisdiction? Any personal stories of EOSHD users interesting to share with this community? Interesting episode in Brazil (sorry, only available in native Portuguese) where the bird can't be 30 meters (horizontally) nearby people for justifiable reasons : D http://g1.globo.com/bahia/bahia-meio-dia/videos/t/edicoes/v/homem-e-preso-por-importunacao-sexual-apos-filmar-mulheres-com-o-auxilio-de-um-drone/7663339/

Amazeballs knows his stuff, Mr. @BTM_Pix : -)

Vimeo for the matter : ) But the point could be some other though. Something people don't really care and I see too little anywhere. Some stuff holds further processing pressure to next generations to come included, some others don't. That's make such a difference! : ) I'd dare to say the difference imposed by high bitrate or, for example, raw vs H.265... Let's speak it openly and very frankly, H.265 is a delivery codec, not designed for acquisition. Let alone bit depth... E : -)

By Jove, how can you claim that based on a single version encoded on Vimeo? It is beyond me... Let alone previous ones! That's like a whore, you can't guess where she was before : X I'd only admit this comment: certain outcome or codecs handle much better processing than the further degradation this sample shows. That one I might accept it. E : -)

Well, 3 against 1, I'd tend to wonder what the hell of stuff you're consuming...? LOL ; ) But, the first fact is that you're unable to properly evaluate anything from encoded not native footage, c'mon... : ) There's something wrong with your display source. There's nothing wrong neither on the face of the man with blue shirt where you said, though. Without mention my disclaimer that such photography is not of my liking at all BTW : D E : -)

Hope 4K 60p this time! : -D

Man, buddy, this is worthy of product of the year! : -)

Mr. Pix ; ) don't you have yet any estimated input on these both availability date and price ones? BTW, do you know what LiDAR means in my native Portuguese? "To handle" is not literal but stands as closer meaning. Funny and proper denomination to say little about the choice : ) I am thinking to buy a 2nd 2018 Pocket unit ; ) only 'cause this your product now. You can ask your commission from Grant Petty! ; -) You've always been one of my favs over here and you well know it : ) I deserve my discounted price LOL You and good oldie Odin are my daily entertainers to say the least, so that one comes from my own pocket : D

When available in our hands as estimated date? : -)

No, I've never used the Z6, correct. Didn't feel actually any need to be sincere. Cameras don't harm anyone, so how could I have anything against this one? LOL : ) I think it might interest me to afford one unit, again, comprehending 4K 60p. I wouldn't mind to couple to a Atomos recorder if so, but you can't reach such frame rate even going that route. Street price always tends to be lower than MSRP still announced or mere target price under TBC, hence my remark : -)

Sure not, S1 is better featured ; ) And where S1's CS owes anything to Nikons?! AF is the only disadvantage I see but following your perspective, if "most pros have an external monitor" as you write, go figure if they will invariably need any AF going along such setup... LOL : ) Without mention, worse AF doesn't mean unusable AF either : P You say S1H street price won't be lower, let's wait and see ; -)