Leaderboard

[img]http://www.eoshd.com/comments/uploads/inline/1/500ad15a53a2c_in495munchbstscream1893.jpg[/img]

Specifically, all of this sh-t just looks cool... lol. Somewhere in there is a Gh2. [attachment=267:photo.JPG]

....... just for giggles..... here is an IMax single frame of Kodak Film next to a GH2 so you can see the size of one frame next to the GH2 Sensor [img]http://i42.photobucket.com/albums/e307/blackmore1/IMG_1508.jpg[/img] and here is IMax frame ontop of GH2 - it covers the entire lens mount and then some ! [img]http://i42.photobucket.com/albums/e307/blackmore1/IMG_1509.jpg[/img] here is GH2 - IMax single Frame, 70mm frames , 35mm frames and 16mm frames just for comparison [img]http://i42.photobucket.com/albums/e307/blackmore1/IMG_1514.jpg[/img] GH2 sensor is closest to 35mm frame in size . Having shot film for 15 years - last job I did on film was 2004 - it's been all digial since then - I can't say I miss it! Digital is more convenient to use! and alot cheaper ! I used to have to insure the negative as it went to the lab incase the courier distroyed it or lost it and the whole job was lost! $$$$$

Digital HAS beaten film. I am pretty sure 5K or Super Hi Vision would look more detailed than the best S35mm film scan on IMAX. Would you notice even more resolution from 65mm on IMAX? I haven't yet. For sure digital has better sensitivity to light with less noise. With the Sony F65 it also has a wider colour gamut and better dynamic range. Case closed!

Someone (not anybody mentioned above) did actually hack the Olympus USB firmware update protocol and made some progress towards a hack. But no new info has surfaced since last month and the guy who did it was pretty anonymous! One should not expect a hacker to rescue every camera. This one is more a case of letting the issues be known to Olympus so they can do a proper firmware update.